Comments: 21
stuntedsanity In reply to KatCardy [2011-03-25 19:41:23 +0000 UTC]
All fair comments - you kinda hit the nail on the head with the tail as it was something of an afterthought. The composition of the figure needed something to balance it a little 'cos it's all on the left so I popped the tail in there at the end to compensate.
The shading too is a little bit of a rush job (mild understatement) and does have the distinct whiff of 'oh god Top Gear is about to start!' to it. Originally (when I realised I wasn't ever gonna have time to colour it) I was just gonna put the lineart up but it didn't look properly finished so I added a tiny speck of colour.
Thanks very much for critique ('tis appreciated) and I'm glad you like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jvel4073 [2011-08-10 22:59:06 +0000 UTC]
Very Creative.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ogrebear [2011-07-04 21:35:15 +0000 UTC]
Good looking beastman.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WesleyRiot [2011-05-02 14:35:18 +0000 UTC]
i havent had a proper look at your shit in a long time, so to me i've just noticed a sudden increase in your skillz, both in anatomy drawing and line quality. respec'
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
stuntedsanity In reply to WesleyRiot [2011-05-07 16:55:56 +0000 UTC]
Thanks - very kind of you to say so.
I take my time but I get there in the end.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
stuntedsanity In reply to gliovampire [2011-04-01 21:31:41 +0000 UTC]
Thanks - he's not as bad as he seems though. He just has to be more careful around breezes (one gust of wind and he's in danger of being arrested - that is not a funtional piece of clothing he's wearing...)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
norab1984 [2011-03-14 21:12:37 +0000 UTC]
good.. but there is something not quite right with the neck... or the name
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
stuntedsanity In reply to norab1984 [2011-03-15 20:19:19 +0000 UTC]
The name is rubbish (as is my habit - if you think of a better one let me know) and the neck is quite deliberately far too long. Though the anatomy is a little wobbly too there.
Thank you kindly!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
norab1984 In reply to stuntedsanity [2011-03-16 22:18:19 +0000 UTC]
well how about tresocular or trioculi or tresoculi or triocularus??
i'm pretty sure tri and clops have different word origins but anyway it sounds like a very clumsy name... but i can see where you got the name from (cyclops and tria for 3)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bkr911 [2011-03-14 20:18:00 +0000 UTC]
very cool
👍: 0 ⏩: 1