Comments: 17
sORRYbUTnO [2009-09-20 03:10:38 +0000 UTC]
omg when you leave it alone it looks like a sandstorm!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
COShoshA [2009-09-05 02:16:24 +0000 UTC]
QUE SARPADO!! *O*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ssjskipp In reply to wonderwhy-ER [2009-09-04 16:12:16 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I misunderstood -- yes, I can easily do that. xD! I store initial positions, so that's very possible.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
wonderwhy-ER In reply to ssjskipp [2009-09-04 20:20:48 +0000 UTC]
Hmm I mean in smaller version and still flying near cursor. Like here [link] with text.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ssjskipp In reply to wonderwhy-ER [2009-09-05 05:17:56 +0000 UTC]
You mean like, only the area around the mouse? Or scale the image itself smaller?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ssjskipp In reply to wonderwhy-ER [2009-09-08 19:41:06 +0000 UTC]
Hey, is it what you were thinking now? Hold the mouse down to use it as the center, and the pixels will go to their correct positions relative.
Also, that number is the # of pixels it's working with. Press space to generate new ones.
Also, just a request, but would you mind if I used a copy of your memory/fps graph/counter?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ssjskipp In reply to wonderwhy-ER [2009-09-04 15:51:46 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I'll play with it a little, see if I can make a LMB hold converge to mouse, release explode out with stored energy. Then shift reset to spacebar or something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ssjskipp In reply to wonderwhy-ER [2009-09-04 15:56:58 +0000 UTC]
It's close enough for me -- any project where I need flash to handle both .as files and .fla is just terrible. There's hardly any code completion, no bracket/parenthesis highlighting, and for me, it tends to slow down when the whole screen is text (no idea why). However, working on frames is a breeze. I never really code directly onto a movieclip's frame. I did stumble across (I don't know if it was from you, or some other source) an undocumented function that enables you to apply a function/actionscript to a movieclip's frame. (more info here [link] )
But yes, some sort of flash extension, or perhaps CS5 will enable something like in-flash support for a FD-esque IDE, would be ideal. They really need to overhaul flash and re-design it from the core to enable both programmer and animator functionality... I keep finding many problems with CS4, and it really seems like they keep building off of Macromedia's age-old program.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wonderwhy-ER In reply to ssjskipp [2009-09-04 16:32:35 +0000 UTC]
Yeah seems to me too. What they need really to do is to open up CS5 for developers more so that people like you or me could add our own panels more easier and change behavior of existing to some extent. I wanted to add code completions my self but did not found good documentation on JSF and did not found at all on how to do some things(adding custom hints to Action panels hint dictionary or in any other way messing with code hinting). I find such oneness more important then Adobe built actions panel upgrade. I don't believe they will do all I want anyways even if I start screaming about those features in all possible places so having possibility to add them my self seems to me as a better approach.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0