Comments: 12
TenaciousDave [2011-09-03 22:24:23 +0000 UTC]
is it like
pansexual in the sense that you'd do everything that moves
or everything that's human
or everything that's in your vision
pick one
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
attila-the-honeypie In reply to TenaciousDave [2012-05-24 02:04:23 +0000 UTC]
It's not about who you'd do, it's who you'd love. And it would be restricted to human beings of legal age. It's just not restricted by any matter of gender.
Attila
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Somtimes In reply to TenaciousDave [2011-09-03 22:26:01 +0000 UTC]
I'd do anything that proved itself not a total jackass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TenaciousDave In reply to Somtimes [2011-09-03 22:27:58 +0000 UTC]
Would you do a puppy that cuddled up against your leg or something
Or a dude who pretended to be a jackass but really wasn't and you knew
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Somtimes In reply to TenaciousDave [2011-09-03 22:30:26 +0000 UTC]
Nope. That's beastiality.
And no. I can tell when their pretending.
Would you do someone who was a complete jerk? Would you do a female who wasn't really a female? Would you do a little puppy? Would you kindly fuck off?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TenaciousDave In reply to Somtimes [2011-09-03 22:56:14 +0000 UTC]
Yes.
For money.
For lots of money.
For you, no charge.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TazeeTazee In reply to TenaciousDave [2011-09-28 23:21:18 +0000 UTC]
this is the difference between being steryotyped as a pansexual whore and actually being a pansexual whore. sometimes, i applaud your ability to not completely flip a bitch at tenaciousdave. he really is an ass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0