Comments: 51
railfanner47 [2018-11-02 22:54:43 +0000 UTC]
Slap this on a poster for the GNR, and it just looks natural!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sgtjack2016 [2018-01-02 16:23:37 +0000 UTC]
Doe anyone else think that Emily's smoke box looks like hair?
👍: 2 ⏩: 4
lmsfan11 In reply to sgtjack2016 [2018-06-18 03:52:55 +0000 UTC]
in genral the strirling'sdo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to sgtjack2016 [2018-01-02 22:08:57 +0000 UTC]
It's never crossed my mind to be honest but now that you've mentioned it....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Animeillustrator96 [2017-10-31 23:53:00 +0000 UTC]
Emily has to be my favorite engine...just because of her design! It's nice to look at her, to watch her big wheel spin. <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Animeillustrator96 [2017-11-01 08:26:43 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I wouldn't like Emily half as much if she were a different prototype The Stirling Singles are easily the most beautiful 4-2-2s in my opinion but there is something about inside cylinder types as well, think it's the rate of their slow driver rotation combined with the way they just seem to glide along the rails in an almost eerie manner thanks to a lack of visible moving parts.
12:24
www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5reFp…
15:11
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH7OTY…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Waltsland1912 [2017-10-26 07:47:45 +0000 UTC]
the foreman is like: oh damn! here's Emily! you scum bow before her rigth now!
workmen: we don't get paid enough for this
emily: thats rigth, queen of the railway, what a nice title!XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Waltsland1912 [2017-10-29 10:09:49 +0000 UTC]
'They're bowing because i'm such a splendid engine' she thought importantly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Waltsland1912 [2017-11-04 10:07:40 +0000 UTC]
No to be frank, she has no place in his envisionment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Waltsland1912 In reply to SleeperAgent1 [2017-11-07 13:02:47 +0000 UTC]
really!? i was expecting becouse an engine like Iron Duke and Emily have similar calibere let's say
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Waltsland1912 [2017-11-07 14:13:15 +0000 UTC]
Dropping any fanciful notions of her working on the NWR you could perhaps of put her in a NRM story like with the Iron Duke and Rocket replicas but No.1 hasn't been steamed for quite some years.
The other option would be a flash back as with Albert but as the Stirling Singles were withdrawn before Gordon was built a cross over link would be a little tenuous, perhaps an anniversary event could serve as an excuse for the GNR engines to be united/reunited.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Waltsland1912 In reply to SleeperAgent1 [2017-11-07 16:45:18 +0000 UTC]
my theory was that she was inniatially builted as a replica for the British Empire Exibhition in 1909 but she only completed in 1911 due to the lack of founds, later she was bougth by S&M for express serviçes running from Grovan's Gate to Barrow, with the formation of the NWR in 1915, she was passed down to the GNR but only for a few months, as WWI ended, Emily was given to NWR but in 1928 was bougth by the LNER and given to the NRM, and later in 2003 she finally returned to Sodor were she's become a permanent resident. what you think of my theory?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Waltsland1912 [2017-11-12 10:46:08 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure what to say to that as your version is such a different take on events.
Even if the S&MR were better off finically and they even managed to complete their tunnel and get a bridge across the channel a Stirling Single wouldn't be massively suitable for such stoping trains as they were racers and also probably would be too heavy for their track unless it were upgraded.
The replica notion isn't entirely implausible as the Caledonian's 123 Single was a very unlikely one off but with the 1909 exhibition there were still a number of Stirling Singles left which could of been polished up, but by then of course they were in their decline.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Waltsland1912 In reply to SleeperAgent1 [2017-11-12 12:02:06 +0000 UTC]
I'm still learning british railway history and i trying to know every single fact. Btw have you seen my drawings?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Waltsland1912 [2017-11-12 13:01:36 +0000 UTC]
I wasn't trying to be critical, the amount of things this Limey still doesn't know about Britain's railways could fill several libraries
I've had another look since you opened a new account just now and many are to my liking but I have a general rule about not favouring uploads with watermarks as it spoils them.
Oh btw I did make a start on studying the Stirling Singles on behalf of someone and to ultimately serve a future modelling project if it's of interest, just scroll down past the Ada, Jane and Mable stuff.
sodorislandforums.com/thread/6…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Waltsland1912 In reply to SleeperAgent1 [2017-11-16 10:58:42 +0000 UTC]
No not all, i know you're being critical, oh wow thats soo cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Waltsland1912 [2017-11-17 20:05:52 +0000 UTC]
Well thought you might like to see some of Ivatt's domed updates of Stirling's design Not sure if you know but Patrick Stirling had a brother James who was the CME of the SER. It's hard to find many pics online but his handsome F class had a passing resemblance to the Singles, except of course they were slightly smaller 4-4-0s. Anywho one of those slightly more modern designs might be a good alternative to Emily, been meaning to photoshop one actually.
farm2.staticflickr.com/1510/23…
www.southeasternandchathamrail…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Waltsland1912 In reply to SleeperAgent1 [2017-11-23 12:47:48 +0000 UTC]
wow...thats actually looks similar to the Royal Portuguese Engine! remember that 2-2-2 by Beyer & Peacock Coº?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Waltsland1912 [2017-11-25 11:38:33 +0000 UTC]
Aye I recall, fine looking engine. The updated version didn't look as elegant nor did the umber livery do much for them in my opinion,
www.southeasternandchathamrail…
(Album No.2)
but the design itself was beautiful and they did last longer than the GNR Singles so could be worthy of the NWR at a push.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Waltsland1912 In reply to SleeperAgent1 [2017-12-13 14:47:28 +0000 UTC]
really? soo in that case the NWR could had bouth one of them and then later turn her into a proper GNR Single?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Waltsland1912 [2017-12-13 19:59:08 +0000 UTC]
Eh? The James Stirling's engines on the SER were independent from the Patrick Stirlings on the GNR. It's true he did apprentice under him which explains some of the overlapping appearance similarities, but even if it were feasible why would one rebuild a 4-4-0 into a 4-2-2?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Waltsland1912 [2017-10-26 07:45:53 +0000 UTC]
ahhhh i love it!!!!XD well done my friend!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BorisFedorov [2017-10-22 19:30:01 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, she is of a Mid Victorian design. Know you are a bit of a technical Awdry purest so I'll just leave it with my first comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gingercat65 [2017-10-22 16:14:39 +0000 UTC]
Amazing work
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to Gingercat65 [2017-10-22 21:38:04 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Luca, had wanted to use this one for a while.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Charpatian [2017-10-22 13:56:29 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful! ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
despicme95 In reply to SleeperAgent1 [2017-11-21 21:23:19 +0000 UTC]
Please tell me more about the picture and the reason for it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SleeperAgent1 In reply to despicme95 [2017-11-21 23:28:33 +0000 UTC]
It's just a publicity photo taken in 1925. The two engines were first placed along side each other in 1922 and the Single was also rolled out when the H4 (K3) class was introduced, the large Atlantic class as well I believe (all taken at Top Shed close to Kings Cross where the preserved engine was housed for several years).
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The-ARC-Minister [2017-10-22 13:42:43 +0000 UTC]
Are they bowing... or laying down the rails?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1