HOME | DD

seeJANEsin — .0120.

Published: 2006-07-29 06:05:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 609; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 79
Redirect to original
Description none
Related content
Comments: 22

xxxPoseidoNxxx [2006-07-31 08:03:32 +0000 UTC]

oh brillant

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

livelyarsenic [2006-07-31 06:51:39 +0000 UTC]

the colors make it such a precious gem !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mineylloyd [2006-07-30 10:24:10 +0000 UTC]

great idea...very well done...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

guiltjohnson [2006-07-29 10:24:22 +0000 UTC]

Another beauty, and controversial too, it seems.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Unstabl3-art [2006-07-29 10:10:59 +0000 UTC]

love the mix of colors **

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pixelbudah [2006-07-29 09:31:03 +0000 UTC]

this is wonderfull amazing great

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

UntitledAnonymous [2006-07-29 09:16:07 +0000 UTC]

The positive opinions here definitely outweigh the negative (albeit slightly confused) one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rysphoto [2006-07-29 07:27:20 +0000 UTC]

simple, colorful, symetrical but not, i like it a lot nice work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cool4dude [2006-07-29 07:24:37 +0000 UTC]

I personally found the fact that the road sign was "obstructing view of the tree" to be one of the cooler features of this picture. Especially because it's a do not enter sign. It seems to poke at meaning without being blantant. Other than that them colors is purdy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WinGzx18 [2006-07-29 06:48:13 +0000 UTC]

wow very nice. this would make an awesome wallpaper, put it in the center, and have a light blue sides to it would work really nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lowapproach [2006-07-29 06:41:16 +0000 UTC]

Sky is overworked creating lines toward the top, Road sign obstructing the tree view, a pole is obstructing the other tree view while the middle tree is oversharpened and unbalanced, not sure with this dimensions that this is a vertical pano. Scrap Material.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

UntitledAnonymous In reply to lowapproach [2006-07-29 07:13:13 +0000 UTC]

Scrap material? How so? Because you're nitpicking at a ridiculous degree? No offense, but shut up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lowapproach In reply to UntitledAnonymous [2006-07-29 08:29:48 +0000 UTC]

I'm entitled to any Critque I want to furnish, since it stated that this user has specified no particular prefrence in regards to the Critique instensity in the comment recieved on this deviation, Scrap is by no means "Trash" so no offense, keep your Mouth Shut.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

UntitledAnonymous In reply to lowapproach [2006-07-29 08:50:25 +0000 UTC]

Right, but perhaps next time you should probably not try to make yourself sound so knowledgeable about composition. You just come off as a pretentious asshole. First of all, the lines are from resizing. Anyone with even basic knowledge of photoshop knows this. Also, it's a photo in the suburbs, it's not rural. So your whole "obstruction" arguement really holds no water.. at all. And what about dimensions? Are you talking about resolution? Do you even know what a panoramic is? Any more than one photo stitched together to create a larger photo is a panoramic. This, is a panoramic. Also, something you may eventually learn in photography. You can't always help how nature creates things. Your over-zealousness on analyzing things way too much seems to overlook this. It's a tree.. not a perfectly symmetrical cone. Now go get rid of that over-inflated ego of yours and re-evaluate the word "criticsm".

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

lowapproach In reply to UntitledAnonymous [2006-07-29 08:56:11 +0000 UTC]

Do you feel better LoL
Overprocessed Junk

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

UntitledAnonymous In reply to lowapproach [2006-07-29 09:04:45 +0000 UTC]

Now was that so hard? It was pretty evident that you just wanted to bash it as soon as you opened your mouth. Atleast it's interesting. You should take note

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

seeJANEsin In reply to UntitledAnonymous [2006-07-29 08:54:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shiny-Purple-Socks [2006-07-29 06:32:59 +0000 UTC]

That's a lovely, generous amount of sky...wide angle lense or several stitched photos?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

seeJANEsin In reply to Shiny-Purple-Socks [2006-07-29 07:19:29 +0000 UTC]

it was made with 3 different photos.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Shiny-Purple-Socks In reply to seeJANEsin [2006-07-29 08:06:57 +0000 UTC]

It's seamless, very well done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NelyanaPhonexia [2006-07-29 06:13:59 +0000 UTC]

gorgeous! I love the colors. They just make me happy. I like the length of it and the overall composition.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Temperemental [2006-07-29 06:08:43 +0000 UTC]

peaceful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0