Comments: 60
RvBOMally In reply to ??? [2018-05-30 17:33:39 +0000 UTC]
Theyβre democratic, but the options are Fascists and Nazis.
π: 0 β©: 0
mars1812 [2017-08-25 05:50:16 +0000 UTC]
So, I just remembered I had an account, and don't want to bombard you with comments on everything you've ever made, but your timelines and your writing is just so incredible and you've been a genuine inspiration to me. Like, your legit one of my favorite writers, and I look forward to your new stuff the same way I look forward to episodes of my favorite TV shows. You rock, dude, and you're a fantastic writer.
π: 0 β©: 0
BadgingBadger [2016-08-24 00:32:21 +0000 UTC]
Why didn't Iran become socialist earlier? Both the soviets and the brits were fighting a war to dismantle the country for its oil, and souring soviet-british relations could lead to the USSR declaring war on the British Empire and occupying all of Iran after a british withdraw (which could still prevent a larger war due to overstretched soviet supply lines).
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to BadgingBadger [2016-08-24 00:40:29 +0000 UTC]
"USSR declaring war on the British Empire"
And risk being in a two-front war against the Germans and British? Stalin wasn't that bold.
π: 0 β©: 1
BadgingBadger In reply to RvBOMally [2016-08-24 02:27:53 +0000 UTC]
That, if Hitler cancels his plan to invade the USSR.
I personally don't think the war would escalate much beyond Iran, as the most the brits could do were bombing runs in the caucasus and a hard circumnavigation of either Norway or the Pacific to attack the huge place. Which would be useless as the soviets could just retreat to the interior and the British Empire had no land borders with the USSR. Would be a hard fought battle, as this was different from the Russian Civil War.
π: 0 β©: 0
TheAstronomicon [2015-08-04 16:19:17 +0000 UTC]
I don't see Italy going that pro-Berlin when Italian Fascists were literally disgusted by the very idea of racialism having decried race itself as a falsehood propagated by those seeking to control peoples.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to TheAstronomicon [2015-08-04 16:54:06 +0000 UTC]
Well, since the war ended, only the Nazis were willing to support the Fascist regime, and so the German-Italian relationship grew stronger over the decades. A lot of German racial propaganda managed to travel south to Italy and convince blocs of the Fascist Party, who in turn sought to use that rhetoric to gain the support of Berlin over their rivals.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Whiteshore1 [2015-08-04 12:07:44 +0000 UTC]
1. Who rules Taiwan?
2. How powerful is the Republic of India?
3. Who are the main "rogue states" in this world?
4. How tense is the three-way cold war?
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Whiteshore1 [2015-08-04 16:55:18 +0000 UTC]
1. The Republic of China.Β
2. Weaker than OTL.Β
3. Albania, Pakistan, French Algeria, Iraq, Libya.Β
4. Pretty tense, particularly between Germany and the Soviet Union.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Whiteshore1 In reply to RvBOMally [2015-08-06 13:19:16 +0000 UTC]
1. Are the Nazis and Soviets "currently" as bad as say Modern-day China?
2. Is there any regime which has the same level of badness as the DPRK?
3. What did Saddam Hussein end up doing in this world?
4. What bloc is the most powerful?
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Whiteshore1 [2015-08-06 13:51:42 +0000 UTC]
1. Around that bad, yeah.Β
2. Albania.Β
3. Why do you keep asking about this guy? He's not in charge of Iraq.Β
4. The Western bloc.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Whiteshore1 In reply to RvBOMally [2016-03-23 12:40:07 +0000 UTC]
Why is Bangladesh part of India ITTL?
π: 0 β©: 0
Warpath20 [2015-08-04 11:12:25 +0000 UTC]
Hmm... I'm curious as to what's happening in Nazi Germany ITTL. You know; what the culture is, the society, the status of the German Jews (did the Holocaust still went as planned?), the relative status of Germany with regards to the power of the United States and the Soviets (they're the weakest, aren't they)...
Also, I'm surprised that the Germans didn't demand Alsace-Lorraine from France (or for that matter, Eupen-Malmedy), seeing as they controlled much of Europe at that time.
And, are you going to make that Philippine-wank you mention awhile back? Β
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Warpath20 [2015-08-04 17:00:59 +0000 UTC]
Germany is basically a more modern, less militaristic Nazi Germany, one that is still rather authoritarian but has liberalized to the point that foreigners (even untermensch, but not Jews) can visit without issue. The Holocaust occurred, although not as completely (see: Israel) because a lot of European Jews fled into Soviet territory during the Soviet-German War. Of course, they deny it ever happened, or if it did, that they were responsible. The Germans are the weakest of the three superpowers.Β
The Allies demanded status quo ante bellum from the Germans, and since the Germans were planning on attacking the USSR, they agreed.Β
Yes, I just need a good PoD.
π: 0 β©: 1
Zomg420 In reply to RvBOMally [2015-08-04 17:14:49 +0000 UTC]
There was actually a point ITTL that Nazi Germany was practically sealed off, North Korea style?
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Zomg420 [2015-08-04 17:17:03 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, the 1950s and 1960s.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Zomg420 In reply to RvBOMally [2015-08-04 17:34:13 +0000 UTC]
Was that under a senile Hitler, or Himmler?
If the latter, I assume Himmler was the Stalin of Nazi Germany and the 70s were the period of Dehimmlerization.
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Zomg420 [2015-08-04 18:23:44 +0000 UTC]
Goebbels. Himmler lost the post-Hitler power struggle.
π: 0 β©: 1
Laputa-Scorefinger In reply to RvBOMally [2015-08-04 18:34:25 +0000 UTC]
Thank the gods; I don't know who thought it was a good idea to put that little wiener in charge of anything bigger than a hot dog stand. Then again, "Nazis" and "good promotion policies" might not go together all that well.
π: 0 β©: 1
InfernoMole In reply to RvBOMally [2016-07-12 14:08:48 +0000 UTC]
What about Speer and Rommel? They seemed to be fairly alright guys.
π: 0 β©: 0
Zomg420 In reply to RvBOMally [2015-08-05 10:09:23 +0000 UTC]
At least Mengele wasn't the head of their science research... right? right?
Also how was 'sealed off' Germany like? I can't imagine it being as bad as Juche NK, since the Germans actually have the means to feed themselves, to some extent.
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Zomg420 [2015-08-05 18:07:24 +0000 UTC]
Mengele never reached any position of prominence.
Germany was much poorer, but it wasn't starving. It was doing much better than OTL Germany immediately after WWII.
π: 0 β©: 0
Laputa-Scorefinger [2015-08-04 11:01:17 +0000 UTC]
Nazis and commies? Can't you just let us forget the mistakes of the 20th century?
I'm a bit curious about the social climate in Germany. Is there an "RT" (previously "Reich Today") English-language news channel funded by Berlin which constantly runs stories about how the evil decadent imperialistic US will roll into Frankfurt with tanks and force Aryan boys to gay-marry each other?
What happened to Himmler-style neo-pagan crap, Welteislehre, looking for Atlantis, all that kinda stuff? How has Christianity been handled; is there a state-approved "Positives Christentum", or is both Protestantism and Catholicism still "kosher" (heh)?
And if I understand it correctly, Germany doesn't deny the Holocaust, just that they had anything to do with it? Huh. Is that one of those things everyone outside the Nazi bloc knows to be bullshit, or are there Western/Soviet historians who actually think the Poles built giant death camps, murdered millions and millions of people from Germany, while occupied by Germany, without Germany knowing about it?
π: 0 β©: 1
Laputa-Scorefinger In reply to RvBOMally [2015-08-04 19:12:28 +0000 UTC]
Well, Positive Christianity wasn't so much an SS-thing as it was an "Okay guys how do we justify praying to a statuette depicting a crucified Jew while also hating Jews?"-thing. In fact, many members of the SS were suspicious of any attempt to combine Nazism with Christianity, instead wanting to completely eradicate any trace of the Judeo-Christian faiths in Germany. Crazy dudes.
I didn't really think about it before, but one seldom sees both Nazi Germany and Israel in the same TL. How are diplomatic relations between the two? I assume they don't get invited to each other's parties a lot ...
And speaking of diplomatic relations, is there some kind of UN-equivalent in this world?
What about Anglo-French relations? Are there (sizable) equivalents of UKIP and FN advocating national independence, or is everyone playing nice in the face of the Red/Brown menace?
How is Western culture ITTL? Going by the usual logic (Enemies! Grrr, bring on the Traditional Values (tm)!), I assume we're dealing with a militant, relatively conservative USA/EU, but you never know. Maybe there's gay marriage and porn somewhere. ;o;
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Laputa-Scorefinger [2015-08-04 19:17:41 +0000 UTC]
I know, but the factions that took over after Goebbels wanted to go back to more traditional German culture as opposed to forcing Nazism.Β
The Israelis and Germans do not recognize each other diplomatically.Β
There is no UN equivalent, although the "United Nations" is used to refer to the Western bloc from time to time.Β
There are pro-independence movements in the EU, but they aren't as strong given the German and Soviet threats.Β
Culture is more conservative, although not by much. Some states in the US, and most European countries, have legalized gay marriage, and nobody has banned pornography apart from child pornography. Well, the Soviets and the Germans have banned porn, but they ban lots of other things, too.
π: 0 β©: 1
Jeckl [2015-08-04 09:50:32 +0000 UTC]
So which is more liberal, the Nazis or the Communists?
π: 0 β©: 3
RvBOMally In reply to Jeckl [2015-08-04 16:52:07 +0000 UTC]
At this point, the Soviet Union has liberalized more, and the Nazis have a firmer control over their state than the CPSU does. But not by much.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Zomg420 In reply to Jeckl [2015-08-04 15:32:28 +0000 UTC]
If USSR is the PRC equivalent, and Nazi Germany the Putin Russia equivalent, then I'd say Soviets are the more liberal ones judging by OTL.
π: 0 β©: 0
KuboCaskett In reply to Jeckl [2015-08-04 14:13:33 +0000 UTC]
Beats me, both suck morally.
π: 0 β©: 0
KuboCaskett [2015-08-04 03:02:52 +0000 UTC]
I'm curious about what's going on in the Reich, since they are aligned with the Slavic dominated Soviet Union (and that the Nazi's considered the White Slavs to be "subhuman") who are buddies with the People's Republic of China (of who are dominated by what the Nazi's consider them as "honorary" despite not being their kind of "Aryan"); in addition the Nazis seemed to have settled with using a Polish buffer state despite Poland and its people and culture being one of the prime targets of Nazism.
Also, I wonder if the Reich ever did "reform" like how the PRC did in OTL? And if you ask me, I do believe it's possible: at the price of Jewish, Slavic, and "Untermenschen" civilization.
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to KuboCaskett [2015-08-04 03:15:17 +0000 UTC]
The Nazis are no longer aligned with the USSR. They had a major war, and are sworn enemies.Β
The Reich is a reformed one-party state with a Putin-esque (he's even ex-SS) strongman at the helm. They kinda had to, in order to survive reality.Β
π: 0 β©: 2
KuboCaskett In reply to RvBOMally [2015-08-04 03:34:29 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I just assumed theyΒ did like how Russia is (sort of) to China. Thanks for clearing that up though.
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to KuboCaskett [2015-08-04 04:16:08 +0000 UTC]
Nah, they're in separate blocs.
π: 0 β©: 0
RvBOMally In reply to Zomg420 [2015-08-04 03:28:50 +0000 UTC]
No and no.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Zomg420 In reply to RvBOMally [2015-08-04 03:34:32 +0000 UTC]
Also how are the trade ties between the Reich and the EU? Cordial out of necessity I assume? Both could use each other's goods, and how integrated is the European Union here? To me, it looks more like a Franco-British Union plus close buddies.
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to Zomg420 [2015-08-04 04:15:45 +0000 UTC]
There is trade between the Reich and the EU, and the EU is a Franco-British Union in all but name.
π: 0 β©: 0
King-Van [2015-08-04 01:54:49 +0000 UTC]
This look's like one of the moreΒ plausible "Axis Victory"Β scenarios, I think...
Good work.
Β
PS: Never heard ofΒ Operation Pike, until now.
Sounds like I could have been a turning point, had it happened before Operation Barbarossa.
Timing really does play a big role in wars.
π: 0 β©: 2
RvBOMally In reply to King-Van [2015-08-04 03:15:49 +0000 UTC]
I think a more detailed look into Operation Pike is worth it, although I don't have enough WWII knowledge to back up a serious timeline with it.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
KuboCaskett In reply to King-Van [2015-08-04 02:57:27 +0000 UTC]
Not really, an "Axis" Victory (or mostly a Nazi German one) would involve Nazi Germany defeating the USSR and proceeding to mostly exterminate the inhabitants under Nazi occupation and enslaving the rest of them in a fashion that might rival or surpass the horridness of the Holocaust (or at least redefinite the name Holocaust but I digress). Then the Reich would be in some cold war with the USA for a while until it collapses or something. Imperial Japan, despite being as evil as the Reich, usually gets defeated by the US and/or the Soviets. And Fascist Italy is Fascist Italy, nuff said.
π: 0 β©: 2
King-Van In reply to KuboCaskett [2015-08-04 03:39:00 +0000 UTC]
Β "Axis Victory" meaning some of them still are around after 1945 in good shape, that's the best outcome they could have got. Ha, Ha.
π: 0 β©: 1
KuboCaskett In reply to King-Van [2015-08-04 03:44:29 +0000 UTC]
Can't argue with that.
π: 0 β©: 1
RvBOMally In reply to KuboCaskett [2015-08-04 03:17:28 +0000 UTC]
Depends on what you mean by "victory." Given the OTL standard is total defeat, a surviving Third Reich is generally considered "victorious."Β
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>