Comments: 5
rotane365 In reply to foundsoundfunny [2015-04-29 23:10:21 +0000 UTC]
I have to add that i use a rather cheap macro/wide-angle adapter, on a camera that isn't made for add-on lenses. So a low quality result should be expected.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foundsoundfunny In reply to rotane365 [2015-04-30 09:09:51 +0000 UTC]
Oh, don't get me wrong! I don't necessarily think of such things as 'low quality' or in some negative way.
I could write at length on my standpoint, but I think basically, I'm anti-film snob, but pro film-like flawed digital.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rotane365 In reply to foundsoundfunny [2015-04-28 13:05:10 +0000 UTC]
Well, the sharpness is a bit of a mixed bag. In the centre of the photo it's perfectly fine, but it tends to lose sharpness towards the edges. Also, my aperture was set to f/5 (which is middle of the road for this camera), so obviously, when you set it to the minimum of f/11, it gets a bit better. I like to think i was pretty parellel here, but honestly can't remember. Obviously, you should try to, since the dof is pretty shallow with the macro lens, even at f/11; and as soon as you start zooming in, it gets insanely shallow.
Alright! And here's me trying to reply to all of your comments
👍: 0 ⏩: 0