Comments: 62
KairiKeyz [2019-04-17 06:52:13 +0000 UTC]
Well I can feel good of myself.
π: 0 β©: 0
HonouNoKage [2017-07-19 19:59:42 +0000 UTC]
... And I support aromanticism.~
π: 0 β©: 0
voidcafe [2017-05-05 14:45:49 +0000 UTC]
Asexual and demibiromantic here, always nice to know there are supportive people Β < 3
π: 0 β©: 2
SuperToni14 In reply to voidcafe [2018-10-17 01:38:10 +0000 UTC]
And I'm a demi-heteroromantic asexual and I agree with you.
π: 0 β©: 1
voidcafe In reply to SuperToni14 [2018-10-17 01:53:50 +0000 UTC]
actually i recently started identifying as aroace, but i still stand by what i said ^^
π: 0 β©: 0
EnforcerWolf [2017-03-04 10:25:08 +0000 UTC]
As an ace, I agree with one so much.
π: 0 β©: 0
Lady-Saki [2017-02-21 16:09:06 +0000 UTC]
I'm asexual and heterodemiromantic. I love this stamp so much.
π: 0 β©: 1
SuperToni14 In reply to Lady-Saki [2018-06-13 00:50:34 +0000 UTC]
You're a demiheteromantic asexual?! So am I!
π: 0 β©: 1
RoadZero In reply to I-Do-Care [2017-02-14 16:09:16 +0000 UTC]
Right. Pretty much anything can become a pain in the neck tbh. Any kind of sexuality, as something which involves interaction of more than one person, is twice as complicated as non-sexuality related features and traits.
π: 0 β©: 0
KittenPrince55 [2016-11-24 18:24:33 +0000 UTC]
Ahh thank you! I'm ace but I'm really romantic. I'm fine with hugs and kisses and snuggles, but NO TOUCHING MY CHEST OR BELOW THE BELTΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
Ennonion [2016-10-11 13:35:57 +0000 UTC]
Isn't asexual means they don't feel sexually attracted to other people?? How can there be romance??
Just askin
π: 0 β©: 2
RoadZero In reply to Ennonion [2016-11-28 17:42:31 +0000 UTC]
Romance can be platonic, as Iku said, and with that, it's just feelings of attachment and butterflies in the stomach, and it can involve hugs and stuff, but there's no "desire" going on. Or you can think of romance in the sense of medievial legends.
π: 0 β©: 0
Iku-P In reply to Ennonion [2016-10-24 19:06:59 +0000 UTC]
Easy. Romance isn't limited to sexΒ Β―\_(γ)_/Β―
For example: I'm asexual. When I get a crush on someone, I want to talk to them, kiss them, hold hands etc., but I don't want to fuck them.
π: 0 β©: 3
Ennonion In reply to Iku-P [2016-11-28 23:41:20 +0000 UTC]
So youre telling me that everybody who's not asexual wants to fuck a crush??
π: 0 β©: 1
Iku-P In reply to Ennonion [2016-11-29 14:48:58 +0000 UTC]
Um, no???? That's not my point at all. I just simplified it to make it easier to understand.
What I'm saying is: crushes for non-asexual people involve romantic AND sexual attraction. (again, it's a simplification.)
Asexuals can experience romantic attraction - aka want a relationship, but they don't desire sex. (unless you're an aromantic asexual, they don't want neither sex nor romance)
π: 0 β©: 1
Ennonion In reply to Iku-P [2016-11-30 13:33:52 +0000 UTC]
i had some romantic fantasies without sexual attraction once..
so was asexual then??
why can't it be just "romance without sexual desire"
π: 0 β©: 1
Iku-P In reply to Ennonion [2016-11-30 18:23:26 +0000 UTC]
Nah.
It's possible for non-asexuals to sometimes desire romance without sex. But for them, it's anΒ exception. You said you felt like that once. It means that, most of the time, you experience both types of attraction, right?
For asexuals, it's always ONLY romantic attraction. (again, save for aromantics)
Why do we need the label 'asexual' rather than just 'wanting romance without sex'? There are multiple reasons.
Imagine me being asked what's my sexual orientation? and replying 'I am able to fall in love with males and females, but I only want a romantic relationship that doesn't involve sex. I never experience sexual desire.'
For someone who's never heard of asexuality before, it would be nonsense. Because for a lot of people romantic and sexual attraction are the same thing. It may sound ridiculous, but it's true. i've met far too many people with this point of view.
But if I say I'm asexual biromantic (and then explain what it means), they are more likely to believe it.
'If something has a name, it probably exists' - almost everyone has that mentality! I do too! (WithinΒ common sense, of course.)
It also makes our feel less alien. Knowing that I'm not the first person on Earth who feels this way, it really makes it easier for me. Makes me feel like I'm not a total abomination.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ennonion In reply to Iku-P [2016-12-01 09:56:10 +0000 UTC]
lol who asks other people about their sexual orientation? Isn't that like, personal??
π: 0 β©: 1
Iku-P In reply to Ennonion [2016-12-01 17:36:51 +0000 UTC]
Is it? Well, not where i live. Generally, everyone assumes you're straight, but if they have doubts, they ask.
My mom has asked me several times (apparently she hopes I will 'become straight' eventually??)
My friend has asked me if I was bisexual when the topic of bi people was brought up.
Etc.
I don't know how it works where you live, though.
π: 0 β©: 0
KittenPrince55 In reply to Iku-P [2016-11-24 18:25:18 +0000 UTC]
Same here, I'll date anyone regardless of gender, but no sex!Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Iku-P In reply to KittenPrince55 [2016-11-25 08:48:21 +0000 UTC]
//ace high five//
π: 0 β©: 1
Ennonion In reply to Iku-P [2016-10-24 22:20:12 +0000 UTC]
Oh.
π: 0 β©: 0
DJtheWubs [2016-05-27 01:20:35 +0000 UTC]
I actually have an oc who's in a relationship and she's asexual~ hehe
π: 0 β©: 0
pastel-suqar [2016-05-01 04:39:00 +0000 UTC]
Okay I hate to be "that person" but what about aromantic asexuals or aromantic sexuals?? I'm asexual panromantic but it feels like people suggest a lot that romantic asexuals are better than aromantic ones
π: 0 β©: 2
RoadZero In reply to pastel-suqar [2016-05-24 09:04:30 +0000 UTC]
Oh, and I hope you don't feel like you've been told off, because I didn't mean it, and that question was reasonable.
π: 0 β©: 1
pastel-suqar In reply to RoadZero [2016-05-25 01:19:38 +0000 UTC]
No, I just was scared a response would result in a fight.Β Β
π: 0 β©: 0
RoadZero In reply to pastel-suqar [2016-05-03 18:30:22 +0000 UTC]
I expected this comment when I was making this.
I have personal, special empathy towards the spectre label in question. I don't just "support" it indifferently and distantly. That doesn't mean I'm antisupportive towards aromantic asexuals - I just can't say I support someone whom I never supported in person. As for aromantic sexuals, I...am afraid it's the first time I hear of a label like that. And I'm not sure I can deeply understand such a person, because I'm too different.
Again, this has no evaluation and nothing about people being first grade or second grade quality.
I can guess why people believe that romantic > aromantic, though. Easy to think they're just being callous. A lack of some, well, romantic aura.
π: 0 β©: 0
Midnighticycreeper [2016-01-06 00:48:26 +0000 UTC]
Romantic Asexuals are the best.Β
No one gets disease,No forced sexual activity,It's truly about Romance and trust and your able to create a true love-bond.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
RoadZero In reply to Midnighticycreeper [2016-01-06 08:28:37 +0000 UTC]
I... kind of feel similar. The best might be not the word, but it definitely feels really convenient. At least on the first glance.
π: 0 β©: 1
MK-R [2015-10-19 18:05:59 +0000 UTC]
romantic ace hereΒ
At least I think I am..Either Ace or demi.
π: 1 β©: 1
RoadZero In reply to MK-R [2015-10-21 08:49:15 +0000 UTC]
Nice to meet you...although you've already deleted your profile ._.
π: 0 β©: 1
MK-R In reply to RoadZero [2015-10-29 22:57:07 +0000 UTC]
School years?
High school?
π: 0 β©: 0
RoadZero In reply to Aerodil [2015-09-21 06:27:19 +0000 UTC]
Hugs :>
π: 0 β©: 0
Mons00n In reply to tultsi93 [2015-08-01 09:33:06 +0000 UTC]
Awww, me too~
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>