HOME | DD

Remarin In reply to ScionOfStorm [2018-09-23 18:42:28 +0000 UTC]

You're so welcome!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Remarin In reply to brightberries [2018-09-23 17:27:17 +0000 UTC]

Hahah well, "anthro backs" for me are basically "human backs" because I directly reference human anatomy to draw them :'3 I'd draw a feline anthro's back identical to a canine's humanoid back,, I'd even draw an anthro-horse the same. I think of my anthros often as human torsos with animal heads pasted onto them (and sometimes digitigrade legs)

I recently did a general thingie on human anatomy as a whole -Human Anatomy-

But for more specific back tutorials, there are tons of more professional sources when it comes to human anatomy www.google.com/search?client=f…

www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EgQdv…

If you're asking for direct anatomy tutorial, then I'd basically be just making carbon copies of ProkoTV videos 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

brightberries In reply to Remarin [2018-09-23 17:54:54 +0000 UTC]

do you know anyone who does draw anthro backs with more feline or canine anatomy translated into biped structure?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Remarin In reply to brightberries [2018-09-23 19:26:33 +0000 UTC]

Hmm it's not something I keep an eye out for like that, so I don't have anything spring to mind. If I were to make anthros that look stereotypical dog / cat-like, I'd make one broad and buff like this one, and the cat slender and slim. But that's design differences , not anatomical differences.
Like here's an anthro/humanoid cat that's relatively buff-looking static1.squarespace.com/static…
And here's the same artist drawing another cat humanoid www.granitassocies.com/images/…
(examples come from Blacksad)
Human anatomy is quite diverse already, so most anthro artists don't think to differentiate between anatomical details when it comes to backs/torsos. It's usually in the smaller details where they differntiate, hands, paws, ears, tails,, and most importantly face. The only way I could imagine they'd make a significant difference between cat and dog humanoid backs, is if they used animal torsos, and animal shoulderblades, but then that wouldn't exactly be a classic "anthro" but rather a were-creature,, like the design for Lupin from Harry Potter vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/pp…
^this is technically an anthro canine, with canine anatomy concerning the back,, but I'd presume that's not the kind of anthro you're looking for?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

vehemourn In reply to brightberries [2018-09-23 18:18:50 +0000 UTC]

i think the problem with translating a canine to a biped structure, and expecting something that isnt particularly human, is that canines arent a biped structure and we are 
its not going to look much different than a human anyways no matter what you do, especially since we're one of the only species that walks quite like this.
you could use something like an ape as a reference if you want something more in the middle (ish) but generally, translating something to an anthro (like a human) youre going to get a human structure (like a human)
THAT and canines and felines are already pretty close to a human structure relatively, so if you shift em around a enough youd literally just get a human 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0