Comments: 35
red5 In reply to RockAngel93 [2011-12-20 01:04:03 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for your comment. You are right about how show is portrayed in the stories but this is a twist on that knowing full well the true nature of Snow. On a side note, please watch for my friend Armie Hammer as the Prince in the upcoming Snow White film "Mirror Mirror".
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kahl [2010-07-04 18:26:58 +0000 UTC]
This is really well done but you should include your reference source in the artist comments. [link]
Using a reference is fine but when you say "Here's my version" it gives the impression that you came to this concept all on your own. It's disingenuous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
red5 In reply to kahl [2010-07-05 21:34:57 +0000 UTC]
It was done in 2004 when I was learning illustrator. Thank you for the snotty comment. I read your blog and also noticed you call yourself a filmmaker. What films have you made? If you haven't made a film or worked on one it's disingenuous to call yourself a filmmaker. I make a living working on films and television shows and you can find me on IMDB.
P.S. I found your movie review...well, please make a film before you continue to critique films.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kahl In reply to red5 [2010-07-05 22:21:46 +0000 UTC]
It wasn't intended to be snotty at all. I've seen people's work get removed from DA for not having proper reference sitings. Believe it or not, I was trying to help you because I genuinely like the image. If I'd intended to be snotty I would not have included a compliment. I've been on DA a long time and I spend far more time encouraging artists and trying to help them. I don't leave snide remarks for the sake of being snide. That isn't who I am. You should really try assuming the best in people before you jump to the worst conclusions.
As for my filmmaking, I've worked on "Chasing Amy" as well as several other independent projects and write my own scripts. My work has also been appeared on Italian Television. I've been associated with "Top Hat Productions", "View Askew Productions," "Blonde Ambition productions", "Main Street Productions," as well as others and worked with casting agencies. I have a degree in filmmaking from the Art Institute in Philadelphia only because I couldn't afford to go to the other colleges that accepted me: NYU, AFI, USC, Temple, Vancouver Film. No I am not on IMDB. So I haven't worked for some major studio, nor am I a household name--doesn't mean I'm not a filmmaker any less than you are a professor because you've only been doing it for a year. I'm just starting out. No one starts at the top.
No one has to be an expert on anything to supply their opinion on it. My film reviews are a way to share my love of cinema with my friends and anyone who cares to listen (or read). If I thought I were an expert, I'd be submitting them to film magazines or trying to make a career out of it like as a teacher or a critic.
I'm sorry my simple comment caused such an aggressive response. I'll be sure to avoid your gallery in the future.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
red5 In reply to kahl [2010-07-05 23:26:18 +0000 UTC]
Chasing Amy? Wow, I know the art director Jim Williams on 'Chasing Amy'. We know someone in common. I went to Columbia College in Chicago because I couldn''t afford the other schools. Teaching at AFI was supplemental income during the Writer's Strike and I was teaching something that I know very well. Please believe me that I know about starting from the botom up. I started as a grip/electric in Chicago and moved out to LA to be an art department assistant on The Polar Express. From there I worked several films before becoming a graphic artist/designer for 'CSI: Miami' and a lot of other television shows. I've directed a few music videos and commercials and I'm currently in negotiations to sell a spec script I've written. My thought on film critics is that they are all failed or wannabe filmmakers. Roger Ebert, huge film critic, is a prime example...His only film credits include such great hits as 'Beyond the Valley of the Dolls' and 'Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens'. Such great films... ugggh.
Sorry to come across as aggressive. Hope you have a great day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shoelesss [2007-08-24 21:12:31 +0000 UTC]
nice addition, the red stockings
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
qualified-teen [2006-02-26 21:39:34 +0000 UTC]
yay I love snow white
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
plumpener [2006-02-01 03:26:37 +0000 UTC]
Excellent!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
plumpener In reply to red5 [2006-02-04 15:38:51 +0000 UTC]
Smiles!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shocks [2004-10-06 16:00:51 +0000 UTC]
hehe, erotic ! her ass is alittle jaggy but overal nice for a 2nd time
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
red5 In reply to slvrmntzn [2004-09-01 15:48:01 +0000 UTC]
The eroticism of the piece stems from the fact she's alone and at the same time in a "pleasurable" mood.
The lifting of the dress is leading to something else very erotic so she's not really concerned about focusing on something in her hand but focused on what her hand is about to do.
The eroticism is also connected to the mind of the viewer and what the viewer brings to the piece on their own.
Or atleast, that's what I was going for.
Thank you for your comments. I appreciate them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
justthorne [2004-04-15 16:27:35 +0000 UTC]
I must admit I adore your own scandalous eye, sir. This is wonderful, besides being well-executed and a huge portend of your progress.
My only quibble is with the composition by her leg, which might mislead the eye to see her thigh as a bit thinner than makes sense. Ultimately, I think your intention becomes clear, but it's a bit of a thwart on first glance. I might like a slightly smoother transition beneath her neck, too.
To your "big picture," though, your "setting" is dazzling and ideally elaborate. Her expression appears perfect. Hell, her assets look so very, very splendid. (I'm also quite taken with your rendition of her shoulders - the dimensionalty of form/fabric there is awesome.) And, of course, the star of the image, as might well should be, is the lace pattern of her stockings altogether. It's nice how the overall composition draws us upward first, but ultimately plonks us right down onto your punchline.
Superb. Have you hooked up with the * vbu yet? You already have every basis to belong mightily among their number.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kthulhu1028 [2004-04-15 06:22:51 +0000 UTC]
sweet!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Simonne [2004-04-15 06:19:04 +0000 UTC]
ooh, scandalous!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0