Comments: 34
sandersblack [2011-02-09 20:00:39 +0000 UTC]
This piece is just awesome. The colors are great and the wood grain is just perfect. Did you do anything special to get the grain to pop like that?
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
rabid-potato In reply to sandersblack [2011-02-18 20:57:54 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much!
I enhanced the texture by running a wire bristle barbecue brush with the grain, but most of it is just the wood itself. I've found myself rapidly falling in love with red oak, haha.
đ: 0 âŠ: 0
itharu [2010-11-22 06:00:18 +0000 UTC]
Exposing the wood texture is something that was really needed for this work to stand out more than it would without it. Excellent work in getting that to show and print.
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
rabid-potato In reply to itharu [2011-02-18 22:26:12 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! Red oak is a joy to work with- all I did to enhance the texture was run a wire bristle brush along the grain to bring it out a little.
đ: 0 âŠ: 0
rabid-potato In reply to wyte-majick [2010-11-07 03:10:07 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I definitely want to incorporate the grain of the wood into my work more.
đ: 0 âŠ: 0
gornikiewicz [2010-10-26 11:31:37 +0000 UTC]
Incredibly good job!
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
C-2-158 [2010-09-03 10:52:32 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful print, flawless registration, well composed.
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
rabid-potato In reply to C-2-158 [2010-11-07 02:17:15 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much!
đ: 0 âŠ: 0
AniseShaw [2010-08-03 08:41:24 +0000 UTC]
The subtle nature of your imagery in this makes it one of your best pieces. I like it very much, it has a silent, slow feel to it that really tickles my fancy.
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
rabid-potato In reply to AniseShaw [2010-11-07 02:44:48 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much!
I really appreciate that you took the time to leave such a thoughtful comment- I love getting insight into what my work makes people feel.
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
rabid-potato In reply to AutumnEmbers [2010-08-01 01:54:08 +0000 UTC]
Urbanization v. nature, oooh, I like that!
See, that's what I love about hearing other people's interpretations of my work- it doesn't matter if that's what I was going for or not; what really matters is what each person takes away from it using their own experience in their interpretations.
One of my teachers once said that once you create an artwork, it's free, and you can no longer control what other people will think of it or how they will interpret it. I've tried to take that to heart, and even if I think "oh no, that's totally wrong, that's not what I meant at all!", it really isn't wrong. Like when I was working on this one, people were commenting on how topical it was in relation to the Gulf oil spill. And it did fit, oddly enough- even though I'd started the print months before the spill. It doesn't make their interpretations wrong, by any stretch of the imagination.
/essay hahaha
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
colourscientist [2010-07-15 10:29:42 +0000 UTC]
love it. incredible detail!
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
Ubastyyat [2010-07-13 05:58:05 +0000 UTC]
The moths are what get me. That centre one in the foreground is just so realistic.
Also, COLOURS YEAAAAHHH!
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
rabid-potato In reply to Ubastyyat [2010-07-15 18:28:37 +0000 UTC]
ilu. <3
I'm so glad the moths came out well, because I was worried that they looked too light compared to the branch.
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
Ubastyyat In reply to rabid-potato [2010-07-15 18:30:14 +0000 UTC]
Maybe, but I noticed them so thhhhppppttt
đ: 0 âŠ: 0
cozyfire [2010-07-10 19:39:48 +0000 UTC]
!!
Man, this blows me away as a final print. I love how you work with the wood texture so the entire piece has a melty drippy motion to match the tar (also, that tar. That tar eating the little moth on the top and the moth sort of struggling against it - love).
I am out of words this morning, but yeah. This piece is gorgeous and I see why you were pleased about it.
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
mouse2cat [2010-07-10 17:18:50 +0000 UTC]
I really really like this print. I think the woodgrain of the block is adds to the imagery without being a distracting element. Woodgrain is something I have been avoiding like the plague with my linocuts but only because I am not patient enough to deal with a wood surface. I think my favorite of your prints are the ones with a more subtle take on the symbolism. It is still there and I don't think you have to worry about it getting missed.
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
rabid-potato In reply to mouse2cat [2010-07-15 18:59:53 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much! I know I keep saying this, but you always leave the best comments.
I suppose I'm trying to be more subtle about the symbolism because it feels...hrm, how to say it...more mature, I guess? I personally like the diagrams and symbols and figures all over the place sort of look, but I also don't want to get stuck in doing the same thing over and over. I'm also trying not to fight the grain of the wood so much, and I hope I'm on the right track with using textured wood like this.
If you're wanting to try wood but don't want it to be too difficult, I'd suggest trying shina. It's kind of expensive, but it's the softest wood I've ever carved and doesn't split nearly as much as oak or cherry or crappy I-have-no-idea-what-this-is plywood (which is what I tend to use).
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
mouse2cat In reply to rabid-potato [2010-07-15 22:33:17 +0000 UTC]
I actually have this piece of shina that I rub against my face from time to time. Like a babies bottom. I don't think you can get shina as big as I like without spending a million jillion dollars for it. I know exactly what you mean about trying to carve crap wood. For the amount of pain you cause yourself the extra $50 is such a small thing in comparison.
Your work seems to touch on nature mythology which is something I am reading about to inform my own work. I am interested in how ancient pagan tree warship still affects culture to this day. I feel like the alchemical symbols are an element that may make your work less accessible for some people. You need to avoid the "I don't know this symbol" walking away reaction. Alchemy is about the ideas of change at it's core, maybe even trying to control changes when they are ultimately outside of human control. Which lends itself nature imagery.
Thanks about the comment thing.
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
rabid-potato In reply to mouse2cat [2010-11-07 03:32:01 +0000 UTC]
Mmm, you definitely raise a good point with the whole walking away reaction- I never really thought of it that way before. I'm fascinated by nature mythology as well- what books have you been reading? I've got this massive brick of a book called "The Secret Teachings of All Ages" by Manly P. Hall, and while it's kind of hard to get through, it's got some great ideas.
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
mechacharibdys [2010-07-10 03:03:17 +0000 UTC]
Brilliant use of texture! I've always wanted to try red oak. How's it carve?
đ: 0 âŠ: 1
rabid-potato In reply to mechacharibdys [2010-07-15 18:44:40 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much! It's definitely harder than shina, but not as hard as cherry. It tends to split more than either of those, though, so be prepared for some hair-tearing if you're like me and have to have every little detail perfect. If you can just let go and work with the grain and occasional splitting, it's wonderful to carve.
For actual carving, shina is still my favorite, though. It carves so easy it feels like cheating.
đ: 0 âŠ: 0