Comments: 34
jasonpgray [2018-03-18 10:57:59 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful. I would like to walk around inside this picture!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
arapito [2010-09-12 10:55:01 +0000 UTC]
great
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shreyatantia [2010-02-23 08:20:54 +0000 UTC]
wow this is really nice !
can you teach me how to do this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shreyatantia [2010-02-23 08:18:10 +0000 UTC]
wow this 1 is really nice!
can you teach me how you did this?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
northangel27 [2009-06-10 22:50:55 +0000 UTC]
This is just fantastic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hermitsrme [2008-04-10 02:05:30 +0000 UTC]
i like this
interesting patterns
and there is a type of motion to it too
cheers
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wubbahduckie [2008-02-23 11:27:46 +0000 UTC]
This is just beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
wubbahduckie In reply to r4v1 [2008-02-29 19:48:51 +0000 UTC]
no problem!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FractalRock [2007-02-01 17:43:09 +0000 UTC]
Wow! I know this isn't a fractal, but it is so fractal-like in appearance. It reminds me of hypnagogic vision.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MamaLucia [2007-01-19 04:20:20 +0000 UTC]
The colors, lighting and shapes are cool. And I like the paisley and ripple effects. It just seems to lack a focal point. And a full view makes it more confusing, rather than clarifying the picture or adding needed details.
Perhaps less would be more?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
r4v1 In reply to MamaLucia [2007-01-19 17:19:41 +0000 UTC]
Its not really meant to have a focal point. However I do understand that the full view is a bit too full-on. Though, it may also be dependant on your screen resolution as when I saw this from I a friends computer I agree with you, but from my computer and the ones at school, it didnt have this effect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Viscious-Speed [2007-01-18 09:05:33 +0000 UTC]
Trippy! They look like planets given a paisley effect. The light that this piece has is brilliant!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
faeriecrone [2007-01-16 22:46:24 +0000 UTC]
I find it fascinating that you accomplish something similar to some of my stuff but with a completely different technique. One layer ... wow! Mine have hundreds sometimes.
Do you build the colors? Or choose them as is?
Plus, did you cut a small portion out of a big painting or did you paint it as is? I am so curious.
Lovely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
r4v1 In reply to faeriecrone [2007-01-17 20:54:06 +0000 UTC]
Mine would be so much better with hundreds as I would have more control - but I don't have the patience to or the CPU processing power too.
I start off with 2 / 3 colours and work with them and if I like how I'm doing, I continue; if I dont, I scrap it and start with a fresh set of colours. by continue, I mean add many many more colours - sometimes even upto 9 - 12 at a time.
I partly build them and partly choose as is - it all depends on the first 2 - 3 actions.
I decide how large I want the canvas to be before I start and work on that.
However, unlike my fractals where you can see all of it, I make my abstracts fill up the whole page to give the 'full on' effect as though there is more beyond the frame. I dont crop/adjust anything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
faeriecrone In reply to r4v1 [2007-01-17 22:50:11 +0000 UTC]
Most of my paintings are a small portion of a much, much larger canvas ... just to get that same effect.
It is always fascinating to hear how someone else works. Are the colors chosen thematically?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
r4v1 In reply to faeriecrone [2007-01-18 16:19:12 +0000 UTC]
thematically? is that meaning as though I know what I want in mind? no - I actually just 'play' around with randomly selected colours to see if I like the effect. I always name the title after I make it as I think the art should define the title and not the other way round.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
faeriecrone In reply to r4v1 [2007-01-18 17:52:43 +0000 UTC]
that is what I did when I started. now I have an idea of something that happened or was said or I saw in my day and that is the start for the basic shape. the colors are always the same.
as you know, I avoid titles altogether unless it is a very personal piece.
thanks fro explaining.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ravmaster [2007-01-16 17:28:08 +0000 UTC]
>:@ damn colors! but nice mix and arrangement...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1