HOME | DD

Pzychonoir β€” Mutated by-nc-nd

Published: 2012-02-11 17:11:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 362; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 13
Redirect to original
Description This was originally a dull purple clematis but somehow mutated to this stronger colour with pinkish edges, which are very hard to get, the ultraviolet lense didn't seem to help, but I think it caught some of the amazing colouring of this flower.
Also mutated from a single to a double flower, as you can see in this pic. This was one of the beauties of my garden, I hope it revives again this spring.



---------

My webpage: pzychoart.wix.com/pzychospell
My facebook page: www.facebook.com/pages/Pzychon…
My stock account: pzychostock.deviantart.com/

If you like my work, please support my work by purchasing downloads of it, it will give you a full high-res view without watermark, and it will make me very happy and keep working hard on providing more images!
Commission work for an exclusive or non-exclusive set of pictures is more than welcome, or if you simply wish to have more of this session you can also request the rest here: pzychoart.wix.com/pzychospell

Related content
Comments: 4

berndroesch [2012-02-11 17:33:56 +0000 UTC]

It look very nice. To get more real color you need do image processing and modify to match better to real seen. Reason is seeing is far more than what teh eyes recoginize. the Brain in everybodies head do too image processing and do white balance and Contrast enhancement.The Camera program try to simulate, but work not very good.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pzychonoir In reply to berndroesch [2012-02-12 15:26:32 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much. It has been processed already, however it's got an artificial feeling to it, I don't like to process much pics, because each computer has different options of brightness, and all that, and sometimes I've seen my deviations from other computers and they look like overdone and all that, so I don't like playing with it much, I think it also depends of how well lit the room in which I'm doing the processing is, but this colour is very close to the original

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

berndroesch In reply to Pzychonoir [2012-02-13 16:25:09 +0000 UTC]

thats a problem, most notebook have not good display and also the TN TFT Displays. To see color and contrast more correct, you better look 1 meter away.then the color change due to viewing angle is not recognize so much.On a notebook you sit mostly too near for good color and contrast.

Now come more and more cheap IPS or VA PVA displays they come very close to real color. they have good color, even if you look from side.

If somebody want really exact colors he need photograph in the current motiv light the colorchecker table too.And the software of colorchecker know the diffrence and correct the image.

[link]

A better as nothing solution or if you dont want buy such a thing, you can photograph such a color card on your monitor, and compare the photograph image on screen.You see then which of your camera setting make best natural images or you can with image processing make it better that the photograph image look simular to the display on monitor.

but then you need be sure, your monitor show good color.

to calibrate a monitor, there is a color calibration Hardware as Spyder 3 or 4 here. The express version(which cost not much) is ok, for 1 monitor.

I see from a friend, the diffrence is very very few, so i see it not as important for normal Monitor viewing of images.

Only if you want print images, it is more important, because the calibratet profile reduce brightness and contrast and the monitor output look simular to the print on paper.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Pzychonoir In reply to berndroesch [2012-02-15 18:05:54 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!! yeah, that's my husband job, he works in printing! and he has to check all that of colours and so on, I guess mine aren't too bad, or he would have complained to me already, I guess!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0