Comments: 4
berndroesch [2012-02-11 17:33:56 +0000 UTC]
It look very nice. To get more real color you need do image processing and modify to match better to real seen. Reason is seeing is far more than what teh eyes recoginize. the Brain in everybodies head do too image processing and do white balance and Contrast enhancement.The Camera program try to simulate, but work not very good.
π: 0 β©: 1
berndroesch In reply to Pzychonoir [2012-02-13 16:25:09 +0000 UTC]
thats a problem, most notebook have not good display and also the TN TFT Displays. To see color and contrast more correct, you better look 1 meter away.then the color change due to viewing angle is not recognize so much.On a notebook you sit mostly too near for good color and contrast.
Now come more and more cheap IPS or VA PVA displays they come very close to real color. they have good color, even if you look from side.
If somebody want really exact colors he need photograph in the current motiv light the colorchecker table too.And the software of colorchecker know the diffrence and correct the image.
[link]
A better as nothing solution or if you dont want buy such a thing, you can photograph such a color card on your monitor, and compare the photograph image on screen.You see then which of your camera setting make best natural images or you can with image processing make it better that the photograph image look simular to the display on monitor.
but then you need be sure, your monitor show good color.
to calibrate a monitor, there is a color calibration Hardware as Spyder 3 or 4 here. The express version(which cost not much) is ok, for 1 monitor.
I see from a friend, the diffrence is very very few, so i see it not as important for normal Monitor viewing of images.
Only if you want print images, it is more important, because the calibratet profile reduce brightness and contrast and the monitor output look simular to the print on paper.
π: 0 β©: 1