Comments: 38
marisakarisa [2008-09-22 19:03:25 +0000 UTC]
I cannot view the bigger picture, nor can I download it. I think it needs to be re-uploaded. I just keep getting an error that says "file not found". :\
π: 0 β©: 0
marisakarisa [2008-09-22 18:53:10 +0000 UTC]
I cannot view the bigger picture, nor can I download it. I think it needs to be re-uploaded. I just keep getting an error that says "file not found". :\
π: 0 β©: 0
vejuzchill [2008-06-09 23:57:50 +0000 UTC]
i agree with , vintage cameras kick a**. we shouldn't stop using them, just like the vintage audio equipment, now priceless, vintage cameras will gain appeal again. i have a 70's pentax k2, that i picked up from my gramps and a 70's model of the k1000 not the re-release from the nineties, that i learned on, and i found a mamiya 645 in an old dusty box of junk. i haven't gotten the mam to work yet, the shutter sticks. it has double exposure feature too, i never heard of that until i saw this camera.
π: 0 β©: 0
Evariste [2008-03-17 06:30:16 +0000 UTC]
Quite a useful read.
I myself have an affinity for vintage cameras, and am starting to learn to handle a few of the ones I have acquired.
While digital is certainly the way to go in the modern world, especially if photography is your professional career plan, I would recommend to any hobbyist/experimenter, hardcore or not, to try and get their hands on the old-timey stuff and see what they can crank out.
π: 0 β©: 0
Radioactive-LoVe [2007-12-07 07:06:01 +0000 UTC]
I have a Pnasonic DMC-LZ7 and i got if for 199
And they said it was 7 megapixels i am kinda confused its a digital camera too
π: 0 β©: 0
oguzkalafat [2007-07-23 10:56:49 +0000 UTC]
Film dimensions are 36x24mm, not 35x22mm.
π: 0 β©: 0
mantrasiva [2006-06-15 11:30:52 +0000 UTC]
great! thanks
why is in the Miscellaneous directory?
π: 0 β©: 0
ParadoxicalBeauty [2006-03-18 19:21:39 +0000 UTC]
This was very useful, though I wonder if you have any other information about getting the cross processing effect from polaroids?
π: 0 β©: 0
Nikolaj [2005-04-30 09:21:11 +0000 UTC]
It' ectually not the megapixels that count, because when you have 6 MP but your CCD is small, your better of with another camera.
Likewise, the most detail, last time I checked was a camera with 1,5 MP but a huge CCD
A large format digital camera
π: 0 β©: 0
nofear-deepblue [2004-11-01 15:03:21 +0000 UTC]
thanx thanx thanx. great job..
π: 0 β©: 0
pervert-11 [2004-04-26 11:40:09 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot, I found this helpful and a lot of this had more information than I learnt in 2 years of photography and a few more of Studio Arts in high school! The Polaroid stuff sounds very intruiging!
π: 0 β©: 0
In-Apt In reply to achfoo [2004-03-31 00:18:38 +0000 UTC]
Hi there, thank you for the comment.
About the camera prices - maybe *suntech was talking about the S2Pro. It does have a "fake" pixel count... The full-frame, 10+Mp cameras are far more expensive.
About the dimensions of the large format medium... It depends greatly, because many are custom build to the specification of the photographer. There may be a standard size as well, but I am not aware.
π: 0 β©: 0
olivegreenewe [2004-01-31 22:53:56 +0000 UTC]
very interesting
π: 0 β©: 0
degauss [2004-01-21 06:05:34 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a lot for this great article. I learned a lot!
π: 0 β©: 0
grindL [2004-01-20 16:05:19 +0000 UTC]
thank you very much
π: 0 β©: 0
wwwchrisde [2004-01-20 11:56:08 +0000 UTC]
Good one! Not too much of a help for me as I have not the money to buy me a medium or large format cam. But it's informative for those who didn't know already.
Hope to see more tutorials like those already posted here!
π: 0 β©: 0
bzed [2004-01-20 06:06:30 +0000 UTC]
well done, as usual!
There are still some other unusual types but they really don't need to be mentioned here....
π: 0 β©: 0
infra5 [2004-01-20 04:22:35 +0000 UTC]
very cool thank you guys.
π: 0 β©: 0
iceline [2004-01-19 23:49:14 +0000 UTC]
Ey! This is cool info! Well done! Β¦o)
π: 0 β©: 0
xEXILEDx In reply to suntech [2005-01-25 16:50:44 +0000 UTC]
you should updat ehtis.
π: 0 β©: 1
xEXILEDx In reply to suntech [2005-01-28 20:08:01 +0000 UTC]
I think It would be nice to explore digital:
-pointandshoot
-DSLR
a little further.
And maybe even the gigapixle cameras.
π: 0 β©: 0