HOME | DD

paradigm-shifting β€” Political Insanity Defined by

Published: 2013-11-28 16:17:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 1743; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description Also referenced on BubbleWS .


The system isn't broken, it works perfectly. Its just that you've been LIED TO about what exactly the system is designed to do. I'll give you a little hint: it has something to do with a bar of soap and bending over.

They claim to act on our behalf, but they do not. They aren't answerable to the people. Without remorse, they kill in the interests of the state while claiming to serve the interests of the people. And if you don't like the way they are serving 'your interests' you are labeled an "enemy combatant" subject the their disciplinary action.

They rationalize it.

They try to convince us that their actions are for our own good, while the evidence clearly reveals that they are out for THEIR own good and doing us NO good.

These days, a Nobel Peace Prize winner can be hailed as a promoter of unity and peace even as he supports the overthrow and execution of a head of state by terrorists and extremists.

It is a good deal more than hypocrisy, when psychopaths rule the world...

Politicians have a flawless track record of lying to the people and leading the country down the wrong path. Yet, the people still clamor after them, vote for them and place their trust in them. Why do we keep expecting a successful result result from a system that provides PERFECT FAILURE?

Want to learn more? Watch the video .


Browse =paradigm-shifting 's Gallery: Paradigm Shift - An Educational Comedy | Pondscape | Ocean Design Aquarium | Fence Witch | Pop Tarts of DOOM | Legal Music Search | Myself | Journeys With Rebecca | Good Stuff | Best Stuff | WTF?! | Chickzillas | Activism, Sarcastic Humor and Controversy | This Is SPPAAAATTTTTAAAA!! | deviantART | Geek Stuff | BBS Scene / Text[ography] | Regarding The Ladies | Regarding The Guys

[ FEATURED ART | FULL BROWSE | FAVS FOLDERS ] .::. [ Friends & Watchers | Gallery Stats ] .:: Social Media: [ YouTube Accounts | PSEC via Empower | PSEC via BubbleWS | PSEC via Tumblr | PSEC and Time Warrior via ReverbNation | Pondscape via BlueHost & WordPress | Our StumbleUpon | PSEC and Dave Kelso via Pinterest | via Twitter ]

*note: all deviations created under Ubuntu Linux using a bare minimum of one of the following: kdenlive , winff , devede , openmpt , wine , audacity , gimp .
Related content
Comments: 12

Seian69 [2022-07-28 10:48:33 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

namezong [2014-01-07 08:55:29 +0000 UTC]

Two wings, same bird!
In my country, the bird has some 8-10 mings, but with the same result as american 2.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paradigm-shifting In reply to namezong [2014-02-05 23:24:12 +0000 UTC]

Indeed,

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GeneralTate [2013-12-02 03:46:47 +0000 UTC]

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paradigm-shifting In reply to GeneralTate [2013-12-02 07:01:12 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

GeneralTate In reply to paradigm-shifting [2013-12-03 01:22:38 +0000 UTC]

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mobile707 [2013-11-30 03:53:23 +0000 UTC]

Goldman Sachs is nominally led by a man -- I forget his name -- who is ALL IN for Hillary! in 2016.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paradigm-shifting In reply to mobile707 [2013-11-30 08:41:44 +0000 UTC]

He better go buy a cigar then.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

mobile707 In reply to paradigm-shifting [2013-12-02 13:49:11 +0000 UTC]

Yes, indeed -- the future looks bright for Goldman Sachs executives and for the Clintons.


You and me? Not so much…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paradigm-shifting In reply to mobile707 [2013-12-02 20:49:30 +0000 UTC]

That all depends. We're neck deep in shit, so if we roll round in it, thats our own fate by our own free will choice. I personally prefer to see things in terms of opportunity, rather than burden. Shit is fertilizer. Gardens need fertilizer. I like gardens

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Exodvs [2013-11-28 16:27:44 +0000 UTC]

Not only Goldman Sachs. Don't forget McDonalds, Chevron, Exxon Mobil, AIG, Monsanto…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

paradigm-shifting In reply to Exodvs [2013-11-28 17:23:49 +0000 UTC]

Its all pretty much the same anyways. I have a chart somewhere which shows what corporations own what others. Leads back to basically about 4 at the top owning all the rest. But, you get the idea here

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0