HOME | DD
painting-on-the-wall — Oh My Stars -two-
Published: 2005-12-20 03:22:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 1519; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 169
Redirect to original
Description
Model: KatieRelated content
Comments: 32
WELL. Those comments provide for a few minutes of mindless entertainment.
Now that I've had a good laugh, l'll get down to the actual comment.
Katie's body looks AMAZING in this shot. I love the pose.
And I agree that the contrast is a nice touch.
Good photograph all around. Well done.
<3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thank you wifey-poo!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
one last statement for the night. who was it going on about this not being porn? i believe that it is under the 'pornography' catergory.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
your immature opinions are not needed, if you dont have anything helpful or worth noting dont bother leaving a comment. if your going to go through all of the series posted just to say that the model is a slut and that the art is pornography than you need to think of a better way to spend your time and re-adjust your views on pornography. no one. needs to read your rants on these pieces of art just to make you feel better about yourself and your less than fantastic talents. before you go on flaming other people, improve your own art and mature your attitude.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It is under the "fetish" section, which is not pornography. If you don't want to see it, don't look. It's as simple as that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hey i never said i didnt want to see it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I love the color contrast, it makes the model pop off the background.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm glad I'm not the only one, I'm a complete contrast whore... I have to always adjust it to make things bright.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nope, it looks nice, it's not overdone. It's easy to overdue the contrast, but this is nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well thank you very much, I appreciate it a lot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
whats with all the sluttiness? i mean come on. geez. this aint a porno site.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Excuse me, but I fail to see how this can be considered pornography. There's technically no nudity, and it shows far less than most of the fetsh portraits that are constantly on display on dA's front page. This is a beautiful shot, and your negative comment just makes you look like a prudish imbocile.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Thank you very much! I appreciate you sticking up for the photo
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
why thankyou for the nice comments you direct toward me. i think im the finest prudish imbocile around. glad you can see so too!! and porn isnt just nude photos. just cause youre a damn hippy!!! and beautiful... ok... *cough*
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Okay, you have a point, not all pornography contains nudity, but Im mostly concerned with your accusation that the picture is slutty, or the model therein. How so? Because she's in her underwear? At a photo shoot, OH LORD above shield your eyes! Wait, maybe its her pose? No .. no that can't be it, she's standing like anyone might stand anywhere, she's making no indication of her body in an overtly sexual manner, she's not even looking at the camera.
Good gravy, if you're going out of your way to flame this poor girl with something as stupid and inane as "ooh so slutty!", I'd hate to know what you think of such famous dA photographers as =333bracket or *raphaelclass , whose fame lies in their ability to accurately and artistically photograph things such as the naked body.
I don't usually get involved in flame wars, or people seeking attention through negativity, but frankly, fuck off. You've got no right to tell this girl how to do her work, because god forbid she goes to your site and gets the chance to do it to YOURS.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I would really like to hug you right about now.
This girl has stated that's she's 15, so I really can't let her comments bother me too much, because well... she's 15. That explains it.
But thanks again
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hey, Im only glad I came along to notice her rudness and do something about it. But you're right, she's only 15. Good luck, cant wait for more submissions!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
um well firstly i wasnt telling her how to do her work. it said critique welcome so i was just giving my opinion. and i dont see anything wrong with that. this doesnt have anything to do with you so i dont see why youre getting invloved.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh god, are you listening to yourself??
it said critique welcome so i was just giving my opinion
Critique vs Opinion, hmmm. She was interested in helpful criticism, comments, not snarky comments that don't help her whatsoever. Or as you call it, 'you're opinion'. And if you're willing to post these ridiculous comments in the public, than its anyone's business who might see it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Insult the photos all you like, but if you're no interested in seeing skin then don't look at fetish photographs. It's as simple as that. You're just wasting your own time. She's not nude, it's not a violation, it's showing as much as a bathing suit would.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
that is true. but still, i was only saying that shit to have some fun. so i do not believe i wasted my time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
you wasted everyone else's time as well.... fun stuff...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hey i didnt tell everyone to reply to that comment. now did i? it bloody seays critique welcome and i was just giving my opinion. now there is nothing fucken wrong with. are you done crying you stupid fuzz?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Calling someone a slut is not critique. Critique is saying something like "You should adjust the lighting on the left next time". Ask for a dictionary for christmas.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
you're calling me stupid now, is that it? actually dont answer that. im done here.oh and btw, i never said it was a bad photo. just to clear that up. just that it looked slutty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Congratulations on an evening well spent then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
*high five!!!* man you rule!!! atleast someone here agrees!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Just because the picture is of a girl with a certain lack of clothing does not mean that it's slutty, if it's an exercise in photography then I see nothing wrong with it as long as it doesn't violate the DA policy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh yeah, i can totally get where youre coming from. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0