Comments: 131
Seven-deadly-turtles [2013-07-20 05:20:25 +0000 UTC]
I agree full-heartedly on this one, my friend. It isn't even scientifically accurate or realistic in any scientific way. Edward is a vampire and therefore dead, and cold. He cannot physically carry semen or get an erection, so how the HELL did Reneesme (Or however you spell it) come to exist? Not to mention that they all have hair, and Edward is in fact very hairy. Hair cannot grow on a human body that is dead, and hair would rot on a dead human body as well after a while, so why doesn't it? On that note, what exactly is it that makes them have such pale skin? If they do not die in the sun, then I'm sure it would be much easier to hide the fact that they're vampires if they were tanned to some extent. And if they are dead bodies, why do they not have any sort of purple or green or blue tint to their skin? Flesh rots after years, and it changes color, so why doesn't it on them? I'm sure that there isn't some sort of magical body wash that just restores skin to natural color (That would have some badass advertisement though)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Audio-Redux [2012-05-02 02:56:03 +0000 UTC]
On the spectrum from Twilight fans to Twilight haters, I'm in the middle camp with all the people who either think it's just okay or simply don't care. I bought the first book out of curiosity and I think the series had potential that was never reached and I think Meyer was trying to do something different with her "vampires" because of the way they are portrayed, though that clearly backfired and they aren't so much vampires as they are golems with vampiric traits.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LadyJordi [2012-01-16 13:27:49 +0000 UTC]
I couldn't even pass the first page 'cause of the boredom. I even made a street party scene more like a mass-panic scene 'cause twitards were coming. The pics in my gallery. Excuse me while I have to interrogate my family for Twitardism
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
queeeal [2011-09-11 18:57:22 +0000 UTC]
Lol. I think twilight is okay, the films are a NO-NO, but the books I found... they had quite a good plot line, but the way it was written.... sucked.
But I can TOTALLY understand why you loathe Twilight, especially if you hate Vampires, I mean, its still a book, but the creepy thing is it seems to have become an obsession for some :L
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StarryOak [2011-06-28 11:56:37 +0000 UTC]
I always called my mom and dad by their real names. I grew up listening t them calling themselves by their names, so I figured that was how it was supposed to be. And when I got into school, I thought it was stupid and disrespectful to call them by anything but their real names. In retrospect, I was smoopid kid, you know brain smart, not socially. I mean, adults called eachother by their names, why shouldent I. To this day when I meet someone with my family, they ask "You call your mom and dad by their real names?" And I have to explain why. I swear I should get a fake tattoo made that says "Yes, I call my parent by their real names." I could have it reapplied before going out into public and It would be like "Why do yo..." *i show them the tattoo* "Oh..." Why am I talking?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OneWingedMuse In reply to StarryOak [2011-08-24 00:54:49 +0000 UTC]
well if they want you to call them by their real names, I don't seen any problem with it. it's only bella, who addresses her dad by his name behind his back- but calls him dad to his face, that bothered me. seemed really disrespectful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Audio-Redux In reply to OneWingedMuse [2012-05-02 02:33:17 +0000 UTC]
I always thought Bella called her parents by their first names because she wasn't really close to her dad and her relationship with her mom was more "buddies" than mother-daughter; That's the impression I got anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OneWingedMuse In reply to Audio-Redux [2012-05-09 04:55:08 +0000 UTC]
see... i'd be okay with that, if she called her dad "charlie" to his face. but she doesn't. she knows he doesn't want her to call him that. so instead she refers him as charlie to her friends, behind her father's back. to me, that seems disrespectful.
but i might just be old fashioned. i never call my parents by their first names... unless i'm trying to get their attention from across a crowded room.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Suicunee [2011-05-26 19:15:45 +0000 UTC]
I used to like Twilight when it first came out, but then after becoming such a huge rumble, I started to dislike it a lot. Nowadays I just doesn't care; I neither like it nor loathe it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
huggs5 [2011-04-30 02:21:50 +0000 UTC]
you mispelled Twilight as Twlight tee hee
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ilikemypen [2011-04-15 18:47:44 +0000 UTC]
to be honest, i loved the first twilight film when i saw it and i adored the twilight books but over the last few years i have read numourus other things that do the whole teen romance/horror (though I'm not sure Twilight can really be counted as horror)/fantasy genre a lot more justice than twilight.
and i agree with you about the whole calling you parents mum and dad thing. calling them by there names is just odd.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LenKitten [2011-04-10 21:52:18 +0000 UTC]
On the comment to the old lady, I would say she is quite the appropriate age for Edward, considering he's 119 or something. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kereea [2011-04-09 13:17:12 +0000 UTC]
*Deep breath* my Twlight story is much shorter, so, here goes!
I read the first two books and wanted to burn them. For reference on exactly why this is shocking, my teachers in Middle/High School couldn't even make me annotate boooks becuase I felt it was too much like defacing litierary treasure (even with ones it didn't like much such as As I Lay Dying). But I wanted to burn Twilight.
In my group of friends, there were 3 people who read the series all the way trhough, 2 girls and a boy (the boy becuase he is they type of pwerson who must know how things end firsthand). One girl loved it, but didn't talk about it becuase she was (rightly) sure we'd hate it. The boy begged for brain bleach and gave those of us who could take it thw squicky deatails. The third, a sophmore girl, was almost catatonic for a few days becuase the sex/birth scenes had traumatized her.
We were all 'death to Twilight' after that-the one fan just ignored that part of the discussions and/or switched the topic to one everyone liked. In short, the books should not be so popular, and I think they're really only so popular becuase HP was ending and and people were looking for the best big thing and were like "OMG! Thta book is almost as thick and Goblet of Fire! It must be the next HP! Hype it!" I'm nintey percent sure that's that happened.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Josky [2011-04-02 01:36:49 +0000 UTC]
Think that's bad? Here's some of my life:
1. My mom wanted our family to spend more time together, so she made us watch THE ENTIRE DAMN SERIES. Now she's telling me that I'd have a girlfriend if I was more like Edward. Orly? Should I put on some facepaint and start stalking some bipolar slut with a worse case of Asperger's than my own?
2. Second, I go to church. I'm in the choir. Recently, before I was supposed to go up, I was in the back writing an essay on modern-day fiction. I was working on a paragraph on why Twilight wasn't very good. This crazy chick sitting next to me looks over my shoulder, slaps me, knocks my laptop on the floor, and screams so that everyone getting ready for Mass could hear: "EDWARD CULLEN IS GOD! DON'T YOU DARE MAKE FUN OF HIM!" Because the priest was her father and she was a daddy's girl and a liar, I was kicked off the choir, my Dad almost kicked my ass, and I'm saving up for a new laptop.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ilikemypen In reply to Josky [2011-04-15 18:50:40 +0000 UTC]
Damn. that kinda sucks. and if it helps Edward Cullen and Robert Pattinson kinda creep me out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Josky In reply to ilikemypen [2011-04-16 19:41:42 +0000 UTC]
In this society, Edward Cullen would be viewed asan abusive boyfrend, and the state would likely file a restraining order seperating him from Bella. Bella herself would be diagnosed with Narccisistic (sp?) Personality Disorder, possibly Asperger's Syndrome and/or some other form of autism.
Pattison, I actually pity him. All he was was some newbie actor trying to get himself a name and some ass. Now, preteen girls and 40- to 65-year-old women stalk him, chase him, assault him, and ask the most absurd things from him. AHe is a victim, though despite this, we all know how he'll be remembered.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ilikemypen In reply to Josky [2011-04-16 21:03:05 +0000 UTC]
Very true.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Josky In reply to ilikemypen [2011-04-17 01:56:30 +0000 UTC]
Indeed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OneWingedMuse In reply to Josky [2011-04-02 03:12:54 +0000 UTC]
1. Ouch. That does suck. I only watched the movies with the accompaniment of rifftraxs and friends. And Eclipse was so bad we couldn't enjoy the rifftraxs, we just got so pissed off at the movie.
2. Honestly that's assault. There's no reason that you couldn't file charges against her. Because I would have. Especially if she damaged your laptop.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Josky In reply to OneWingedMuse [2011-04-02 03:29:31 +0000 UTC]
I couldn't file charges. Parents didn't believe me, and the only evidence was my busted laptop. Smug bitch just said I was clumsy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OneWingedMuse In reply to Josky [2011-04-02 20:18:54 +0000 UTC]
that's a shame. you should communicate with your parents better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Audio-Redux In reply to Josky [2012-05-02 02:22:55 +0000 UTC]
You should find someone who will listen then; That bitch doesn't deserve to get away.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JenOtaku123 [2011-04-02 00:22:08 +0000 UTC]
I hate Twilight too.
It gave both vampires and werewolves a bad name. -___-
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LexLight92 [2011-04-01 20:44:18 +0000 UTC]
I dislike Twilight too, because c'mon! Vampires which sparkle in the SUN? WTF?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kikirini [2011-04-01 18:44:27 +0000 UTC]
On the girls are supposed to like romance part... something annoying happens to me very often. I have no taste for romance, and refuse to read it unless it's a well written one on the side of an excellent plot. Because of this, girls automatically assume that I hate love. I will never understand people.
Anyway, I'm with you. I read Twilight (to see what the hype was about) and Midnight Sun (because sometimes the guy's point of view is a little easier to read). Like you, I was pretty bored throughout the first pages, until Bella attempted to describe herself, and then I lost it.
What turned me off truly wasn't that I couldn't relate to her (I probably could on several aspects), but rather the obvious wish fulfillment. She claims to be utterly plain, yet everyone finds her attractive. She claims to be uncool and a bookworm, but she's instantly popular. She's nothing special, yet she wins the heart of the man that no other girl could even capture the interest of. Not to mention the blatant sexism and obnoxious female fantasy ("He's attractive and rich, because both are the most important things to have!")
Midnight Sun unfortunately just made the romance look even worse; Edward wasn't given an introduction beyond when Bella arrived at his school, and it seems the only reason he even "fell" for her was because his future-seeing sister suggested it. le sigh. Stephanie Meyer unfortunately lives in the world where men and women cannot fathom the idea of their thoughts straying from their lover for even a second.
Anyway, I only read those two. I don't plan on reading the others. And I hope I never have to.
Also, nothing but love for the smart Twilight fans. But of my best buddies loves Twilight, and even when he defends it it's not like he considers it perfect. Thankfully.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
liebedero [2011-04-01 18:16:00 +0000 UTC]
i'm a girl. I hate twilight too, Edward (the actor) is not hot, but the Jacob guy is okay. SM writes at a 4th grade level- it has been proven. Why on earth would vampires sparkle ? 12 year olds read this. How inappropriate. I Remember and loved both Pokemon and LoTR. Men who are perpetually in high school would frighten me. He isn't dark, Edward is just a pretty boy. Pretty boys are totally fake. period. Thank you for sharing your story.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vampirekiki [2011-04-01 15:11:34 +0000 UTC]
sweetheart, i read your list about why you don't like Twilight, so I warn you that don't ever try to read Lauren Kate's Fallen, it has almost everything that you hate in the book and yes, it's a goddamn rip-off from Twilight, with fallen angels instead of vampires in it. It sucks.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OneWingedMuse In reply to vampirekiki [2011-04-01 21:35:05 +0000 UTC]
oh i heard about that book. thanks for the warning- because i think i have picked up that book at the bookstore once or twice. i like to read random YA books from time to time. it's usually a hit or miss.
i've had a lot of misses. percy jackson was a hit. fablehaven was a faaaaaaar miss.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vampirekiki In reply to OneWingedMuse [2011-04-02 13:16:06 +0000 UTC]
recently i read a numbers of YA novels but mostly they're all misses. Even the famous Hunger Games series.
if i hadn't found Fallen in the library and had borrowed it for free, i surely won't read or buy it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OneWingedMuse In reply to vampirekiki [2011-04-02 21:33:27 +0000 UTC]
omg... yes, hunger games totally destroyed me. i'm actually currently writing a very negative critique about the last two books.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vampirekiki In reply to OneWingedMuse [2011-04-03 00:38:24 +0000 UTC]
the second book isn't so bad, but the last book.....totally sucks. i think it'd be better if the final book split into two books instead, so the plot and characters can develop better. not to mention Collins copied other people's ideas so obviously. Save for Twilight, i can hardly think of any other hyped series which is so very disappointing.
i'd want very much to read your critique! and i myself had done writing 4 parts review of the entire series.XD
Book 1 review [link]
Book 2 Catching Fire review [link]
Book 3 Mockingjay review part 1 [link]
book 3 review part 2 [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OneWingedMuse In reply to vampirekiki [2011-04-03 02:09:21 +0000 UTC]
i am so glad i found someone who agrees with me! most people think i'm crazy for hating mockingjay with a fiery passion.
omg i shall certainly have to see these reviews! after i have finished mine i shall certainly come check yours out. your mockingjay review is even in two parts! haha. i'm still trying to complete my review of catching fire. mockingjay is daunting... i have too many things to gripe about with it. i was so intensely disappointed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vampirekiki In reply to OneWingedMuse [2011-04-03 03:40:21 +0000 UTC]
in my review, some of my points aren't so good. But we're not alone!!! many people had already expressed their disappointment in amazon.com.
i dislike Mockingjay mostly becoz it could have been so much more if the plot and ideas are more skillfully used; and goodness, that book is an insult to the readers, and most of the plots go against everything I'd ever known about human nature, war and revolution.
it's bad that Collins wants to lecture us about war, revolution and the evilness of politicians; instead of simply and faithfully tells a story.
I'll stay put for your reviews, do remember sending me the links!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
akaharuka08 [2011-04-01 14:23:17 +0000 UTC]
"that it took several sessions of reading aloud to my dogs with funny voices and pantomiming to muscle through it. " i do that to my cats!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Coffee-Buzz [2011-04-01 14:14:58 +0000 UTC]
the twilight fan base has become like the Justin Beaver fan base (which we can all thank Usher for). It was good when it didn't have the mad hatter following, I agree OneWindedMuse. it's kind of what happened with Mary Shelly's Frankenstein, Hollywood went balistic for that, the guy in the books is like a broading Gena Showalter male character with a few downsides. I think if they didn't make it into a movie it would have been better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dragonastra [2011-04-01 04:39:03 +0000 UTC]
Makes sense. :3 I read Twilight before it was popular, when I was in middle school. I thought it was alright, but not very interesting or well-written. You know, Harry Potter was so much better. But then it became popular, and I read more books, and I realized how god awful it was.
For me, it's really more of a "this doesn't deserve to be so popular with a huge franchise and movies and stuff" sort of thing.
Kind of helps the books just get stupider XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OneWingedMuse In reply to Dragonastra [2011-04-01 21:41:12 +0000 UTC]
i had a friend who got into it around the same time. she was the reason i picked up the book in the first place. she doesn't read very much so i was intrigued to see what kind of book would actually interest her.
i initially wrote it off that i had simply read more books than she had and that a book like that wouldn't interest me- as i've seen it done before. but then when she confessed to me that she wasn't going to buy breaking dawn because she was afraid that it was going south fast- i decided to look into it again. and that's when i started to realize just how bad it got.
iunno if i had read the book without knowing what was going to happen... if that would have helped me get sucked into it. if i would have thought edward and bella as a healthy relationship. i like to think that i wouldn't but i don't know- simply because i found the beginning of the book dull and put it down. but who knows. i might have been just like my friend... slowly realizing how horrible it was getting.
i know that i never would have condoned the imprinting. that just goes against absolutely everything in my moral being. good god, i don't know how people can think that's okay. even between emily and sam it's disgusting. gah.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragonastra In reply to OneWingedMuse [2011-04-04 02:09:54 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, same. My friend read it before me, and she reads probably as much as I do. She loved the books for a while, but slowly realized that they weren't as good as she revered them to be.
The first time around, especially if you're a young teenage girl, you do sort of get into it. Especially since it was still rather obscure when I first read it, and back then I wasn't so... picky about my books. But it really did go downhill. It may be a good enough book for middle schoolers, who probably don't realize that the whole James thing at the end could have been easily avoided, but not for anyone older.
The imprinting... that was weird. I mean, it's interesting to see the guys having no choice in who they love, but when they imprint on babies, it gets creepy. It's also called child grooming o.o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OneWingedMuse In reply to Dragonastra [2011-04-04 07:09:21 +0000 UTC]
yup. very much so. and yet people condone child grooming. i have no idea why. D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragonastra In reply to OneWingedMuse [2011-04-04 22:32:55 +0000 UTC]
I... have no idea either D: How unfortunate...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vampirekiki [2011-04-01 04:22:04 +0000 UTC]
She addressed her parents by first name (but only behind their back).
totally agree with you on that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vampirekiki In reply to OneWingedMuse [2011-04-02 13:41:30 +0000 UTC]
to me it's more like a culture difference, in my country we're expected to call our parents mom and dad and nothing else.
but just that she did it in her thoughts. like she would call them mom and dad to their faces...
But i still know some parents are okay with their kids calling them by first name basis. Still just as you had mentioned, the way that Bella called her parents by their names BEHIND THEIR BACKS looks really disrespectful.
Plus Bella just keeps looking down at her mother, for no good reason!And she shows her dad barely any respect. That's even more disrespectful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
vampirekiki In reply to vampirekiki [2011-04-03 00:45:42 +0000 UTC]
if i lived with my dad, he surely won't put up with half of the shit Bella had put his dad through.>_<
Plus Bella's mom, what had she done wrong with her daugther to deserve this? that woman spent years raising her daugther, clothed and fed her and she got looked down at in return!?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>