Comments: 47
MyLollipopGestapo [2008-01-16 05:16:22 +0000 UTC]
This one toooooo.
Just my suggestions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
violentjelly [2007-09-23 22:47:38 +0000 UTC]
how much is an infared filter?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Jaicca [2007-06-03 01:30:00 +0000 UTC]
Unreal. <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
midgemckay [2007-02-24 14:37:16 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic photo. So simple, but the IR makes it spectacularly... something-or-other. I imagine you know what I mean.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RebelAngelGurl [2007-02-15 01:40:23 +0000 UTC]
Absolutely a fave. But at this point I have so many of your pieces in my gallery....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RebelAngelGurl In reply to mrsassypants [2007-02-18 00:19:13 +0000 UTC]
I know. I'm kidding. I'm sure there are people who don't think so, but I don't care what they think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
now-voyager [2007-02-10 22:13:29 +0000 UTC]
This doesn't look real - not the IR part - that is really good and interesting. But this looks like a set for a model train... looks like a miniature. Weird...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
now-voyager In reply to mrsassypants [2007-02-11 20:50:29 +0000 UTC]
What? You want me to shave off my moustache?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrsassypants In reply to now-voyager [2007-02-12 05:49:05 +0000 UTC]
it would help.
but i mean that, "this doesn't look real" face.
i said it was surreal.
what else do you people want?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrsassypants In reply to now-voyager [2007-02-16 02:44:28 +0000 UTC]
aww. well i'm kind of low on that.
i'm saving up for portable studio lights.
or strobes.
that's what my photo teacher forces us to call them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Baculus-Rising [2007-02-06 13:26:46 +0000 UTC]
Wow that filter works really well for this shot. The blue and pink artifacts have come out really well. Did you need to adjust to bring them out or did the filter capture them first time?
The blur you added to this gives it that unworldly look that makes images like these so captivating.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrsassypants In reply to Baculus-Rising [2007-02-07 02:25:22 +0000 UTC]
definately definately adjusted. the original image was black and white. haha
thanks el mucho por el favoritado.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrsassypants In reply to Diabolo-Spinner [2007-02-06 03:29:53 +0000 UTC]
honestly? i can't tell you why.
but it has something to do with youtube, a rubber chicken, and paper confetti.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrsassypants In reply to Diabolo-Spinner [2007-02-06 04:43:24 +0000 UTC]
for some reason, one of those monkey lice picking trains just came to mind.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrsassypants In reply to Diabolo-Spinner [2007-02-06 05:00:45 +0000 UTC]
i'd try to explain why, but it wouldn't work out.
i think i have school tomorrow.
belhhhlhehh
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrsassypants In reply to Diabolo-Spinner [2007-02-07 02:41:50 +0000 UTC]
.____.
maybe you should hurt her.
probably emotionally, that's more legal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
johnshine [2007-02-06 02:29:54 +0000 UTC]
Why does this look like a miniature?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrsassypants In reply to johnshine [2007-02-06 03:08:32 +0000 UTC]
because your eyes are unreliable and lopsided.
and because the grass is reallllly long?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
johnshine In reply to mrsassypants [2007-02-10 02:09:54 +0000 UTC]
I figured part of it out (actually the lovely Kate did); the downward angle contributes to it looking miniature.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Fuu-Inverse [2007-02-06 01:59:52 +0000 UTC]
Fun with infared, and at the same time it looks natural. Like a snowy landscape in winter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mrsassypants In reply to Fuu-Inverse [2007-02-06 02:23:31 +0000 UTC]
well i'm still looking for a light pink tree.
but my research team has confirmed they exist!
TO ATLANTIS. HOOOOO-
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yakitini In reply to mrsassypants [2007-02-06 00:57:11 +0000 UTC]
oh ... ps...
i love all your signature tags
👍: 0 ⏩: 1