HOME | DD
MetalShadowOverlord β Strike On Jihad Stamp
Published: 2011-01-27 12:04:58 +0000 UTC; Views: 1629; Favourites: 38; Downloads: 5
Redirect to original
Description
Watch before commenting: [link]"We shall defend our island whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches. We shall fight on the landing grounds. We shall fight in the fields and in the streets. We shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender!"
- Sir Winston Churchill
"Every jihadist no matter what age or gender must be dealt with, just like every nazi no matter what ageο»Ώ was dealt with. Make no mistake about it, I'm not speaking of all Muslims. I have Muslim friend I love like a daughter very much. She hates these bastards. The jihadists must be killed, all of them, no matter what age or gender. It's hell , it is war. Our leaders must act, or in time, we the people will."
- mosquewatcher
Related content
Comments: 84
I don't consider them as humans, they are nothing more but a bunch of monsters.
π: 0 β©: 0
Jihadists are one of the worst type of people. I don't even consider them humans. How can someone live by the ideology of murdering anyone who isn't Islamic? They have to be stopped, once and for all.
π: 0 β©: 1
The UN thought of this, however, that would start WW3.
π: 0 β©: 0
We should also take out all the Extremists Christians.
π: 0 β©: 1
Any extremist what so ever should be taken out. However I will admit there seems to be a lot more Islamic groups out nowadays than others. ~ C
π: 0 β©: 0
No More Jihad! I'll stop practicing Martial Art when Al-Qedia becomes "All-Kinda".
π: 0 β©: 0
Jihadists are cowards and idiots. I really hope that they realize if they nuke Israel or use whatever WMD they have access to is also gonna kill their Muslim brothers in Palestine via nuclear fallout. Plus, they had to hijack AMERICA'S commercial airplanes so they could crash them into two very tall towers, instead of actually getting their own arsenal of military bombers. I'm not against Muslim people, just the crazy Jihadists who believe mass murder will solve their problems. 'Nuff said.
π: 0 β©: 1
"I really hope that they realize if they nuke Israel or use whatever WMD they have access to is also gonna kill their Muslim brothers..."
Jihadists have already shown they don't care if they take a few of their own with them. Hey, if it gets them 72 virgins, they'll do it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Does it say if those virgins are female or even human? ~ C
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually, they're not getting 72 virgins.Β They're going to get 72 Virginians kicking their ass.
π: 0 β©: 1
Whey get to the pearly gates they just see Washington standing there and he bitch slaps them and says, "How dare you desecrate everything we have created." Then he and several other members of the continetla congress just start wailing on his ass. ~ C
π: 0 β©: 1
This. XD
π: 0 β©: 0
Even though, war is necessary. Try choosing peace over power people.
π: 0 β©: 1
Diplomacy should always be the first choice, then war if necessary.
π: 0 β©: 1
I believe the Japanese have a term for this. It's called Ah Ki Do. It translates as peace harmony way. It basically means I'm a peaceful man by prospect and can respect you... but attack or threaten me and I'll kick your teeth in with zero fucks given. ~ C
π: 0 β©: 0
I hate war. There is nothing good in it except it's ending.
π: 0 β©: 1
I support a massive strike on the Jihadists as well. You can't negotiate with terrorists. These guys are the modern equivalent of nazis. I only wish the US would wake up and realize that these guys are really a threat.
π: 0 β©: 1
Actually, these guys are worse than Nazis.
Nazi - wanted Christians, Jews and the handicapped dead.
Islamic terrorists - want EVERYONE dead (who isn't Islamic).
π: 0 β©: 2
Hitler believed in the christian god.
π: 0 β©: 1
Strange, because he massacred many christians as well as jews. But of course, people keep forgetting this.
π: 0 β©: 1
Doesn't matter who he killed, he still had the belief of working for a higher power.
π: 0 β©: 1
And how many devout christians do you know (although this could vary depending on your surroundings) that act the same way? Judging from the lack of major genocides in the local news, I'd say not very many.
I don't believe in the bible, but I can say that if one CRIMINALLY INSANE person interprets it to genocidal violence, that's on them, not innocent christians with their SANITY still intact.(yes, Hitler was insane, which could have contributed enormously in his heinous acts of violence, much more than religion which was more of a scapegoat used by him to exercise his hate crimes under the guise that he was doing good)
Oh, and the man kills jews and people imortalize him as a monster. I mention the killing of other Jehovah's witnesses and suddenly it's "It doesn't matter who he killed".
And (sorry to badger you even more, I try not to be snippy) don't try to pull that overused "Theists make the biggest crime rate" card, because atheists make up a very VERY minor portion of the population, so of course it isn't fair to compare them to theists in things such as crime rates.
π: 0 β©: 1
So genocide is a measure of what?
I think you got the "theist crime rate" thing wrong.
It's people using religion as a means to murder and destroy versus atheists doing the same.
Theists like to group Hitler with Stalin on that. It's convenient.
π: 0 β©: 1
Genocide is a measure of..? I honestly have no idea how to answer. If you mean "What makes a genocide" I'd say exactly what makes one-- the mass-killing of a certain type or types of person or animal.
Either way, it's still an unfair statistic. It doesn't matter WHY a person murders, it's the fact that they murdered that is wrong. Why they did it should not matter.
"Theists" (And I don't know why you insist on saying 'theist' when we all know you dislike christians) "like to group Hitler with Stalin on that. It's convenient."
I don't know what you mean by that. Mind explaining?
π: 0 β©: 0
I'd have to agree with you on this. Not only did these guys admire Hitler, they are taking it a step further by targeting everyone non Islamic.
Nazis however pretty much wanted most people dead too though. Remember the whole crazy Aryan belief of theirs. Pretty much the only one's who might've lived were those they deemed 'worthy of being slaves.'
We need to watch more than ever the movement of these guys. The upheavals occruing in the Middle East right now is only the beginning before they turn their main attention to the rest of us.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah that's true. I forgot about the Aryan thing.
π: 0 β©: 1
I only remember it for how crazy it is. Man, the things people will believe in lol.
π: 0 β©: 1
They target other muslims too...check your sources
π: 0 β©: 0
but the jihadists are cowards, stealthy, they hide in the crowds.
π: 0 β©: 1
Who is the greater coward: The men who kill, or the man who acts politically correct so as not to offend the killers?
We need to emulate what we did in WWII: keep morale high and deal with the enemy no matter where it shows itself. Hell, we dropped the A-bomb on Hiroshima without even a second thought. (However, we did do something unprecedented and helped them rebuild).
π: 0 β©: 1
the greater coward is "the man who acts politically correct so as not to offend the killers."
I'm not saying I disagree with you, all murderers / rapists / thieves need to die a quick death and not rot in our prison system.
but jihad has so many definitions...
[link]
If I use the Islamic word:
I am at jihad with myself over the desire to lose weight and to eat. But I'm Christian and thus would never say that. I would say internal struggle.
π: 0 β©: 0
So do we just give up?
π: 0 β©: 1
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, hey, we dropped the Atom bomb on Hiroshima and never looked back. Man,we need to emulate what we did in WWII. At least back then there was none of the PC bullshit.
π: 0 β©: 1
Flagged as Spam
π: 0 β©: 1
Like I said, which you reiterated, we need to start acting like it's WWII all over again, and it's how we should have STARTED.
π: 0 β©: 0
I dont think attacking people who are attacking people is going to do much....
π: 0 β©: 2
So shooting the mugger before he slits the girls throat wont save the girl?
π: 0 β©: 1
It might, but I dont know who carries around a good enough gun that they could actually be sure that they would shoot the mugger, and not the girl, with out being a point blank range.
And of course if the mugger sees the gun, he'll probably kill the girl right there.
So.... No. It wont.
π: 0 β©: 1
'And of course if the mugger sees the gun, he'll probably kill the girl right there.'
But isnt that a typical response for a police officer to do when he sees someone threatened in such a position?
And that opens ANOTHER can of worms. If someone is mentally unsound to kill an innocent girl just from that, shouldnt the mugger be put down before he causes any more harm to any other innocent girls (Or boys, of course! I'm not prejudice!)?
π: 0 β©: 0
It worked in WWII...
π: 0 β©: 1
Sort of. It completely ruined tons of countrys and made lots of enemies for the US. Not to mention killed an unbelieveable amount of people.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's war. As horrible as it is, sometimes, in order to prevent even greater atrocities, it is an unfortunate necessity. It's like choosing the lesser of two great evils.
π: 0 β©: 1
>.> So far, the Jihad seems to be less destructive.... If both governments just sat down and used words instead of weapons and threats this problem wouldnt be such a problem. Wars only solve things for the time being, while making everything more difficult in the future
π: 0 β©: 1
Do you really think we can sit down and reason with people like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who believe that Israel should be wiped off the face of the Earth?
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>