Comments: 20
wraithsith [2021-01-14 22:27:50 +0000 UTC]
Have you ever read the book βbarbarians to angels: the dark ages reconsideredβ by Peter S. Wells ? Itβs interesting to note that people in the βdark agesβ were a couple inches taller than those living in antiquity indicating a healthier existence. It appears that empires like the Roman Empire seemed to have less healthy citizens on average than the very local rule of say feudal/tribal systems. Sure the βfall of romeβ may have been a big deal culturally but it was hardly the fall of civilization, in fact judging by height & nutrition levels, as well as new modes of cultural expression, it appears the world was simply better off without Rome.
π: 1 β©: 1
wraithsith In reply to mentat0209 [2021-01-15 04:44:29 +0000 UTC]
The population wasnβt lower during the period, the book written by a world-renowed expert of the post-roman era states that the population of the cities did not fall during the time period between classical antiquity and the dark ages. So I presume that the population did not decrease simply because the empire fell. I suppose safety was a problem but it was also achieved by negative-peace, considering there were Republics in both the medieval( Gotland, Iceland, Florence, Siena, Venice, imperial cities, etc)- and classical eras i presume they probably existed throughout late antiquity even if we may not have records for them.
π: 1 β©: 0
Libra1010 [2021-01-12 21:41:33 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
Libra1010 [2021-01-12 20:40:21 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
Crowsrock [2021-01-12 17:39:54 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
li-lith [2021-01-12 13:15:53 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1
bogatyrkhan [2021-01-12 12:10:42 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 1