Comments: 70
AhmedGalal [2007-07-08 22:54:06 +0000 UTC]
now i call tht "ART"
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cartoonfreak821 [2007-05-27 13:51:25 +0000 UTC]
omg this is amazing .... i cant find words to describe its amazingness...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
happytransit [2007-05-05 23:05:08 +0000 UTC]
this is really gorgeous. it's natural beauty, simplicity, spontaneity...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MBoulad In reply to happytransit [2007-05-12 11:35:14 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much for your comment on this...it didn't draw a huge amount of attention, but it's one of my favourites. It's of my oldest daughter, so it's hard NOT to love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dragons-trinity [2006-12-02 04:56:12 +0000 UTC]
Wow, thats beautiful! I love how you paint skin, its realistic but still has a wonderful painty feel to it. I seriously cant believe you did this in a week, the hair is amazing and my favorite butterfly is that big green moth. Stunning.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tikeo [2006-11-28 05:26:39 +0000 UTC]
The hair and the details on the butterflies are beautiful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tikeo In reply to MBoulad [2006-11-29 03:16:03 +0000 UTC]
^-^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MBoulad In reply to blumgrl [2006-11-28 03:20:35 +0000 UTC]
Yep, I let this simmer for awhile before I actually attempted another go. I guess teachers are trying to fit the work into their schedule, rather than when it's convenient for the student, which isn't always the best way to get inspired, but I guess it prepares you for working for someone else I'm wonder if I had deadlines if it would be harder to produce my work...it's possible.
Thanks for your C&C! I prefer portraits that aren't staring directly at the viewer, too. I especially hate those Walmart studio type shots and posed home pics, they just seem SO UNNATURAL, argh!
This is funny, I had more detail in the drapery at one point but wanted to keep it a bit abstract, so TOOK OUT some details Isn't that weird? But I do agree that the hand could use a touch more sharpening up, it's a bit slapdash at the moment
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
blumgrl In reply to MBoulad [2006-11-28 17:48:41 +0000 UTC]
I don't understand why some people teach if they don't even like the children and they can't teach how they'd like to... Ah well, that's a whole nother debate, I suppose you don't really want to get into that.
Ew... Walmart studio picture. It's okay with small babies (like... a few months old) because they have GORGEOUS eyes and innocence and people are attracted to that, but really it's not going to get someone's attention. "Just another portrait".
That is funny o_0 I guess just a difference in taste. I say even if you just define the wrinkles a little more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ZeroStrike [2006-11-28 01:40:48 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful Job on the hair. ^_^ fav
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tasha25 [2006-11-27 19:01:18 +0000 UTC]
This is really imaginative, with the added butterflies. I really like how it seems like it's pulling at her hair. The only thing that annoys me slightly, is that her eyes are maybe a bit wide, it gives the impression, to me, that she isn't exactly smiling, kind of... I dunno, haha. But it seems like a negative expression, instead of a smile, which I'm sure it was supposed to be. Otherwise, absolutely gorgeous colouring, and detail.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pasih [2006-11-27 15:16:58 +0000 UTC]
wow, it's really beautiful
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
aglaranna [2006-11-27 14:41:28 +0000 UTC]
wow!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ArtbySandiJohnson [2006-11-27 13:48:10 +0000 UTC]
This one is just fantastic Michelle. You can tell you had fun with the looseness and freedom to use your imagination. I love the colors and the butterflies and her expression and the movement to her hair. She must just love it. This is what a portrait should be. Definitely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MBoulad In reply to ArtbySandiJohnson [2006-11-29 14:09:12 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for that Sandi, this means a lot to me. You've reaffirmed what I was trying to do here, I'm glad it comes across. It's a relief
I know this could have been more detailed, I was worried about overworking it, and I didn't want to lose the feeling I was trying to convey in the process. But, yes, there was something more. I wanted it to feel whole as a work rather than many elements working seperately. I would stand back and squint at it occasionally, something I haven't done before...to see how it was working overall Doing that doesn't come naturally when working digitally, at least not for me, but I think it's as good an idea here as working traditionally.
I wanted to put my hopes into this painting...for fun and happiness and peace and joy, you said it well. The Sweet Sixteen portrait I painted gave me this same feeling of ease while working, it just flowed. The second portrait was probably doomed at the beginning because I set too many parameters to work within, hoping to match that first painting. It just didn't fit, and I couldn't make it fit.
Thank you for that. You were a lot of help to me in this process!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ArtbySandiJohnson In reply to MBoulad [2006-11-30 13:16:43 +0000 UTC]
Did not need to have more detail. It feels complete and whole. Has she seen it yet?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>