HOME | DD

marble911 — Onychogomphus forcipatus

Published: 2005-04-10 19:09:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 679; Favourites: 15; Downloads: 99
Redirect to original
Description Taken last summer (too early for dragonflies yet).
Related content
Comments: 90

marble911 In reply to ??? [2007-08-24 11:51:40 +0000 UTC]

He was probably laughing his ass off and enjoyed seeing a photographer lie down in front of him in the mud!

Thanks for the comment and fav!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mimet5 [2007-08-22 16:08:05 +0000 UTC]

Looks funny!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to Mimet5 [2007-08-22 20:51:34 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, dragonflies can look quite comical, I think it is because of the big eyes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lentekriebel [2007-07-16 14:26:11 +0000 UTC]

Amazing picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shaulinka [2007-07-05 06:54:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

marble911 [2005-11-29 10:08:45 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Pat!
I absolutely adore those. Don't find them that often and they are a bit harder to catch than blue darters but their colours are amazing. And so are the forceps of the males
Hope it looks good on your desktop

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

patrx [2005-11-26 18:01:36 +0000 UTC]

LOL Cute shot, Kathryn!! I love the comical look on its face!! It reminds me of the "GOT MILK?" commercials that air on TV here in the states. Only I'd make a slight change in the caption since its ''milk mustache'' is a bit on the green side...."Got Creme d'menthe?" .... LOL I put it on my desktop screen with and added 'green' masking to the outermost white of the border that matched the green of its eyes. I just left a narrow white band to the inside of the border. It looks good. It would look good with a dark green matte if it were matted and framed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to patrx [2005-11-29 11:31:56 +0000 UTC]

Thank you Pat!
I absolutely adore those. Don't find them that often and they are a bit harder to catch than blue darters but their colours are amazing. And so are the forceps of the males
Hope it looks good on your desktop

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to marble911 [2005-11-29 23:11:59 +0000 UTC]

The daughters of the family that I live with thought he looked funny and laughed. It's that green "mustache'' that gives it such a comical look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to patrx [2005-12-05 11:22:41 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, might be the mustache. But the eyes are quite funny too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to marble911 [2005-12-05 21:19:13 +0000 UTC]

Yup...I like its comical look. The combination of the two really add to the effect.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pixelcoma [2005-07-11 20:46:30 +0000 UTC]

Eh, wow! Great shot...

"What are you lookin at?" *lol*

Dragonflies are cool, they are actually big enough not to qualify as small and annoying insects anymore... *runs out and hides before you can slap me*



Cheers, Cliff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to Pixelcoma [2005-07-13 18:42:02 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

Yeah, they are cool...but at the moment I'm more fascinated with all kinds of flies (without "dragons" ), they've got character.
You know, you just have to look through a macro lens and they'll all look big enough not to qualify as "small annoying insects", and then I wouldn't have to slap you anymore. But wait...maybe you actually WANT to be slapped?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pixelcoma In reply to marble911 [2005-07-26 10:09:43 +0000 UTC]

Damn, once again she see's through me...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

qwerty-dot-me [2005-05-07 22:58:23 +0000 UTC]

You allready got me wondering there... Not to be the picky one, but why did you not shrink the size of the images some?

On the them image itself, the colors of the dragonfly bring good contast to the spebblestone background. I think I would have taken it the exact same way

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to qwerty-dot-me [2005-05-08 16:32:29 +0000 UTC]

I guess it was because at this size, you can still see the individual lenses of the compound eyes in some places, if you look carefully. I often have a hard time deciding how small/large I should submit a picture, because what's the use of having a macro lens and capturing all the wonderful detail, and then shrink it to a size where it is barely noticeable?
But I guess I could've submitted this one smaller, it wouldn't have lost much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

qwerty-dot-me In reply to marble911 [2005-05-09 12:36:17 +0000 UTC]

You got a good point there, but when you compare maximum detail vs not scrolling true a picture to see it all (internet that is), then I choose none to little scrolling most of the time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to qwerty-dot-me [2005-05-12 12:57:37 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I know, it's always a tightrope walk. A crop would be a different solution, but when I do that, people usually complain that they want to see the whole animal rather than only the head...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

qwerty-dot-me In reply to marble911 [2005-05-18 10:11:00 +0000 UTC]

I don't get it, why complain about a shoot when it's aways the artist impression. Critics are welcome, but people shouldn't complain. When it comes to critics, they should mention why and how the would like to see it different not only say "I don't like that".

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

grugster [2005-04-22 15:21:58 +0000 UTC]

Excellent colour and contrast!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

inkoginko [2005-04-14 22:04:43 +0000 UTC]

diese grünen Augen sind einfach nur geil,
dass muss ich mal so los werden, ein bisl mehr tifenschärfe hätte das gute tierchen
unter den Augen noch vertragen können, aber echt toll, mag es

ist einen fav wert

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to inkoginko [2005-04-21 15:04:14 +0000 UTC]

Ja, das mit der Schärfentiefe im Makrobereich ist immer so ein Problem, mit den Nahfiltern überhaupt. Ich war eh schon auf Blende 16. Noch höherer Blendenwert und die Bildqualität wird auch wieder schlechter, man sieht jedes futzikleines Staubkörnchen am Sensor und das leicht reicht auch bei guten Lichtverhältnissen nimmer. Ich kenn das Problem, hab dafür aber noch nicht wirklich eine Lösung gefunden. Ist immer eine Gratwanderung.

Ja, die grünen Augen sind definitiv ein Highlight dieser Art...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

onsdag [2005-04-14 20:02:55 +0000 UTC]

Great, well focused photo. And the colours are beautiful in it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to onsdag [2005-04-21 15:25:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot!
Well, I messed up the focus on quite a few of them, but that's the ones the world will never see

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fischfrau [2005-04-14 13:34:05 +0000 UTC]

Igitt *g*
hab ja auf einen vorwarnenderen Titel gehofft

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to fischfrau [2005-04-14 13:59:08 +0000 UTC]

Du weißt eh schon, dass ich beiss, wenn wer igitt zu meinen wunderschönen Viecherln sagt...
Konnte keinen englischen nicht-wissenschaftlichen Namen finden, und Dragonfly 589 oder so wollt ichs auch nicht nennen. Ist es nicht spannender, wenn man keine Ahnung hat, was einen erwartet?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fischfrau In reply to marble911 [2005-04-14 17:52:47 +0000 UTC]

wunderschön? o: *g*
Naja es geht. Zum Glück hab ich ein kräftiges Herz und einen stabilen Sessel

Hab neulich eh auch irgend ein garstiges Tier fotografiert weil ich an dich denken musste (nein, nicht weils aussieht wie du sondern weil ich weiß, dass du eine Affinität für Insekten hast )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to fischfrau [2005-04-14 18:39:08 +0000 UTC]

Also die grünen Augen sind schon cool, findest nicht?

Pau, ich glaub du kannst ganz schön fies sein wennst willst...
Gibt's das "garstige Tier" irgendwo zu sehen, bzw. weißt ungefähr, was es war?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fischfrau In reply to marble911 [2005-04-15 07:23:49 +0000 UTC]

naja blau wär mir lieber.. *motz*

wenn ich will, ja
Bei der Ubahn-Station Volkstheater in einer Auslage... schön riesig... wenn auch nicht echt.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to fischfrau [2005-04-21 14:45:42 +0000 UTC]

Ok, mal schauen, vielleicht hat die nächste blaue Augen.

In der Vitrine des Naturhistorischen Museums?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fischfrau In reply to marble911 [2005-04-22 17:37:16 +0000 UTC]

Wär super

Hm.. ich glaub.. also so quasi als Werbung fürs Museum. Bin mir nimmer ganz sicher obs auch wirklich ums naturhistorische ging

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

vw1956 [2005-04-14 07:59:24 +0000 UTC]

Ist ja schon alles positive gesagt also... ...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Henriksen [2005-04-13 10:34:25 +0000 UTC]

Great shot as always the focus is perfect.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to Henriksen [2005-04-14 12:14:40 +0000 UTC]

Vielen Dank!
Ich freu mich schon darauf, wenn es wieder mehr Libellen zum Fotografieren gibt...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Henriksen In reply to marble911 [2005-04-19 09:48:50 +0000 UTC]

Die Libellen haben nicht jetzt hier gekommen. Ich möchte auch gern die Libellen zum fotografieren, wenn sie hier sind.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to Henriksen [2005-04-21 13:34:08 +0000 UTC]

Ich habe bei uns heuer auch noch keine gesehen, es ist glaub ich noch zu kalt. Diese hier ist vom letzten Sommer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Henriksen In reply to marble911 [2005-04-22 15:30:23 +0000 UTC]

Ich glaubte, dass es vom diesen Jahr war, deshalb war ich sehr überrascht, dass es Libellen in Österreich früher als in Spanien war.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to Henriksen [2005-04-23 18:20:14 +0000 UTC]

Das wäre allerdings sehr seltsam. Bei euch in Spanien ist es doch wärmer, also sollten sie bei euch früher aktiv werden.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

onestar [2005-04-11 19:38:08 +0000 UTC]

Grandma, what big green eyes you have...

The details are once again what I love about this piece. SO many to look at, and so much to see here.

Quite a good shot, darlin'. I like it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to onestar [2005-04-12 08:19:04 +0000 UTC]

Lol the funny thing is that one of my grandmothers really has brownish-green eyes. No compound eyes though, and she can't fly either.
I had to get real close to get the details - I was lying in the mud a few centimetres away from the dragongfly...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sapog [2005-04-11 17:29:56 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful, great colors

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to sapog [2005-04-12 08:19:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!
I love the green eyes of this species...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ageofloss [2005-04-11 14:23:36 +0000 UTC]

Really really good. But you know me I like everything that has dragonflies involved. Great focus, although I think you should have lowered your camera a bit to get the whole dragonfly into the picture. Even though it's abdomen would have been blurry it has great forcepts in the back. All in all, you know what you do. Well done

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to ageofloss [2005-04-12 08:32:04 +0000 UTC]

I guess you're right about getting the whole dragonfly into the picture. It's mainly a thing of me wanting to get as close as possible and to get as much detail as possible. I often forget that a full view of the whole animal would be preferable over just details in some cases. I got several other pics though, which show the abdomen specifically to show the forceps, which are one of the most notable characteristics of the species.

Thanks for the constructive comment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ageofloss In reply to marble911 [2005-04-12 08:56:13 +0000 UTC]

Yes they are. Quite magnificent. Well, actually I think it's better to have as much detail as possible and if possible also show the whole insect. In this case I think you could have gotten the whole insect and the detail you need. When I'm shooting insects I hardly ever think about a good composition, background or anything like that. I'm just happy to be able to photograph the damn insect before it notices me and flies away. But I guess that's the thing when taking macros of living insects I should be more patient tho.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to ageofloss [2005-04-12 08:59:44 +0000 UTC]

Yup, same here. I first take some rather random (composition-wise) photos when shooting insects, and only after I've got a few detailed ones I start thinking about composition and take a few better composed ones (if the insect lets me, that is). And dragonflies have terribly keen eyes, moving the cam around a lot and too quick can spoil everything...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ageofloss In reply to marble911 [2005-04-12 09:06:32 +0000 UTC]

I do that too. And usually I also keep shooting it as I approach it, y'know. so at least I've gotten some shots before it leaves. I know what you mean with dragonflies. they can actually see a small insect from about 20 metres or so, especially the big darners are very cautious and that's why I like photographing them early in the morning when they're not able to fly because of inaquate warmth. Photographing dragonflies is a challenge and I like that. + they're extremely majestic and beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to ageofloss [2005-04-12 09:09:07 +0000 UTC]

Exactly. Better a pic from further away than no pic at all.
What I'd really like to get is a dragonfly in flight, but autofocus doesn't like this, and I'm too slow manually too...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ageofloss In reply to marble911 [2005-04-12 09:13:17 +0000 UTC]

That's right! Damn I've been trying to get in-flight shot's but you know, it just doesn't work for me. I lock the focus and then wait for the dragonfly to come as close to the camera as I think the locked focus was and then I just take the photo. but you know how it is. it never hits the focused area and after all we're talking about macros so the dof isn't that wide.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

marble911 In reply to ageofloss [2005-04-12 09:16:14 +0000 UTC]

Yup, no luck here either. Best I got was too very blurry pics of damselflies in flight. Not altogether bad, but not as good as I want them to be.
I'll be out trying again this summer.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>