Comments: 10
zebrazebrazebra [2006-06-17 12:57:24 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, I think I have to agree with `diamondie There were moments in this that blew me away - 'It's just the pea to your skin' and 'The night was always for waking, love' particularly - but as a whole it didn't really get me swaying like you usually do. I'm sowwy!
π: 0 β©: 0
Pinocchio-Liez [2006-03-30 06:32:04 +0000 UTC]
Wow...that's all I can muster up to say...wow!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
rot10 [2006-03-30 03:51:35 +0000 UTC]
what happened to third hearts
π: 0 β©: 1
manchaliaina In reply to rot10 [2006-03-30 12:04:30 +0000 UTC]
I don't understand.
π: 0 β©: 1
rot10 In reply to manchaliaina [2006-04-01 02:10:51 +0000 UTC]
it's possible to be better lover if you have a third heart that understands what you think you don't or what you think you already know but still you're confused about it and yeah that's what the third heart is all about.
π: 0 β©: 0
diamondie [2006-03-16 22:59:51 +0000 UTC]
I have to say I didn't really like this poem that much. It seems too clichΓ©d and cheesy compared to your usual writing. The first line is too pompous and Celine Dion like and it leaves a first impression that affects the whole piece for me. Using the word "love" seven times in the course of the poem seems excessive.
I like the sixth and seventh stanzas, but I think the rest needs more work. And I probably sound more harsh than I should, because the rest isn't bad, but like I said it doesn't compare to your other love poems.
π: 0 β©: 1
manchaliaina In reply to diamondie [2006-03-27 11:40:39 +0000 UTC]
There are definitely way too many "loves" in this poem. I will have to do something about it. I disagree about the Celine Dion thing, but that may be flat denial. I was going for something in particular and didn't get there. I hate that.
π: 0 β©: 0
originill [2006-03-16 22:23:14 +0000 UTC]
your magnificence baffles me. i do believe in it though. bravo.
π: 0 β©: 0