HOME | DD

LWPaleoArt β€” The Faces of Australovenator WIP

#blue #dinosaur #keratin #megaraptor #pink #portraits #scales #speculative #theropod #tyrannosauroid #wattles #yellow #megaraptoran #megaraptorid #facialintegument #coelurosaur #feathers #paleoart #paleontography #tetanurae #paleoillustration #australovenator #speculativepaleoart
Published: 2017-05-26 00:12:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 2155; Favourites: 61; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description Work in progress on my next drawing, which I've decided to call "The Faces of Australovenator". Here are three different approaches to restoring the same species.

The top one takes the approach that the species was scaled (which I find unlikely, since it's most likely either a tyrannosauroid or a coelurosaur at the very least, which means it definitely was mostly feathered), and I've given it the croc-like facial integument inferred by Carr in the paper describing Daspletosaurus horneri. I've also given it a kertinous boss around the eye as inferred for that taxa, although it's pretty questionable how likely this would have been for Australovenator wintonensis in particular. The only posterior cranial elements we have describing the orbital region are from Murusraptor, and it's hard for me to tell if it would have had this structure or not...it looks fairly smooth, so maybe not, but I decided to go with it anyway.

The second one takes the keratinous approach around the eyes plus segmented keratin on the snout, with gradually fading feathers on the facial region.

The third one is the most speculative, combining cornified keratin on the snout and above the eyes with NashD1 's ideas about theropods having "flesh antlers" in the dorsotemporal fenestra region. Of course, this region *could* just be for vascular thermoregulation...but I really don't see why *some* species couldn't have had this feature. I also gave it wattles around the eyes, colorful ricti, and an expandable throat pouch.

I've really taken a liking to this idea of expandable flesh antlers on that region of the head...again, I think it's pretty plausible that some species could have had it. I thought Australovenator might be a good candidate, as it's not too large as far as theropods go, and didn't have any bony crests...so why not a dermal display structure? It's pretty speculative combining all four display structure together, but hey, why not.

Hopefully I'll be able to shade this sometime soon, but until then I figured I'd show it off because I'm pretty proud with how these turned out.
Related content
Comments: 13

asari13 [2021-05-11 11:34:47 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

LWPaleoArt In reply to asari13 [2021-05-11 16:24:59 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

asari13 [2020-09-19 10:47:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

LWPaleoArt In reply to asari13 [2020-09-25 15:31:52 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LordKaizen [2017-06-26 15:59:52 +0000 UTC]

I love seeing the same species reconstructed in different ways. Β This would be something to demonstrate to laymen about how widely different the same prehistoric animal could be reconstructed by paleontologists.

πŸ‘: 2 ⏩: 0

TrilobiteCannibal [2017-05-26 23:16:09 +0000 UTC]

I was initially biased towards the middle because I love seeing speculation of the tongues of dinosaurs, but when I noticed the bottoms flesh antlers, I was mentally contested
amazing art as usual

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

LWPaleoArt In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-05-28 01:39:50 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so very much, I'm glad to hear you like them!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrilobiteCannibal In reply to LWPaleoArt [2017-05-30 05:50:40 +0000 UTC]

Not a problem

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Glavenychus [2017-05-26 11:32:02 +0000 UTC]

Megaraptorans are a hard bunch to figure out anyway. So far the execution is very promising!

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

LWPaleoArt In reply to Glavenychus [2017-05-26 22:54:49 +0000 UTC]

I'm pleased to hear that you think so. I want to thank you for the as well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Glavenychus In reply to LWPaleoArt [2017-05-27 12:41:21 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NashD1 [2017-05-26 10:14:26 +0000 UTC]

And why shouldn't we have more than one approximations for how these animals could have looked? I certainly want to try more of these sort of juxtapositions of style - while what you prefer is subjective to one's own whims and attitudes we can't explicitly denounce any one of these.

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

LWPaleoArt In reply to NashD1 [2017-05-26 22:59:41 +0000 UTC]

Yes, that's true. We all have our own biases about how a prehistoric animal may have looked. I do, other paleoartists and paleontologists do, the public does, and so on. I personally like the last two the best, and feel like something in between those two depictions would be the closest to what Australovenator actually looked like. However, I still think there's a possibility that the top depiction could be true. After all, paleontological discoveries are continuously surprising. Who could have ever predicted Yi qi for instance.

I'll be interested in seeing your juxtapositions of style as well. I'm probably the most interested in seeing how you think the megaraptorids looked. Can't imagine how the abelisaurids could get any stranger, either.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0