Comments: 18
scifijoe [2015-11-25 04:41:43 +0000 UTC]
Nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Molecular1 [2012-02-23 12:45:15 +0000 UTC]
WOW! Nice!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FeudorLaurent [2009-12-25 09:16:46 +0000 UTC]
Great work! Collaboration at it's best!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
turbolover175 [2009-12-25 08:21:28 +0000 UTC]
You know, I hate to be a stickler, but it's not strictly 3-D. It's still 2-D, it's just that the XY plane is revolving around the Y axis. The object itself never has any depth, only the space in which it's presented.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
LoveRobin In reply to turbolover175 [2009-12-25 14:56:22 +0000 UTC]
::Takes his pokey-stick away:: Go sit in the corner and think about what you've done…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
turbolover175 In reply to LoveRobin [2009-12-26 10:39:50 +0000 UTC]
Don't blame me! Blame one too many Technical Drawing classes in high school! They've warped my fragile little mind!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FeudorLaurent In reply to turbolover175 [2009-12-25 09:16:15 +0000 UTC]
Well, if you look carefully, the KiGo symbol can be seen to be evers so slightly raised above the surface of the card ...
Otherwise, it's just a very, very thin card, I guess...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
turbolover175 In reply to FeudorLaurent [2009-12-25 09:19:05 +0000 UTC]
Aww, dang it. There goes my elaborate explanation...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Erregk In reply to turbolover175 [2009-12-25 20:06:20 +0000 UTC]
I made this in Lightwave 3D, but the conversion from .AVI to .GIF killed the quality.
The reason it looks that flat like that is because I wasn't sure how thick I should make it, being as cards are almost completely flat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
turbolover175 In reply to Erregk [2009-12-26 10:36:23 +0000 UTC]
So it was made in a 3-D program, but the inherent flatness of a card diminished its impact. I see.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Erregk In reply to Erregk [2009-12-25 20:07:51 +0000 UTC]
I'll probably increase the thickness a bit more, that way it'll be a bit more noticable.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0