HOME | DD
LOLMANIC45 — You know...
Published: 2012-02-19 17:30:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 4028; Favourites: 56; Downloads: 28
Redirect to original
Description
.Related content
Comments: 64
Imagine if Mikoto Misaka ever got her hands on this bad boy...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
My friends hate me so much for that railgun
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Actually I heard somewhere that the Nosferatu was based loosely on one of the concept designs proposed for the PAK-FA project, which eventually resulted in the Su-47 Firkin and later the final product, the Su-50 Firefox.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
XD now imagine the fenrir with 6 railguns. Tu-95s and tu-160s will never stand again! XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I fly ECM support with that. It's fast enough and manuverable enough that u can do t without getting caught.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ah, don't worry I'll make poster for all of the superplanes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The only sparkling this Vampire will ever do is when it pops flares and unloads a few dozen missiles into your exhaust.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, what other plane you see that can dual-wield railguns?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
where did you get the picture!!??
Is insane!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Googled: CFA-44 Ace Combat: Assualt Horizon, should be near the top.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Actually, it just shows that one is a noob when it comes to playing Ace Combat Assault Horizon online. I've shot this thing down in a Harrier II Plus.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Now, I wouldn't think so if this was in employed in real-life situations.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
>Employed in Real Life
Doubt that will EVER happen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Not the point. It's badass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not really. The Railgun idea yes. I just personally think the CFA-44 is highly overrated in AC:AH.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Its all about finding what works for you. The performance might be overrated but it works for some and looks good
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I only know of one person who has really mastered the CFA-44 in Ace Combat Assault Horizon, and that's my wingman. I got into a dogfight with this guy today, I was flying a Harrier and I got him.
But as you said, that is true.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well, I am just talking if it were real.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If it was implemented in real life, there'd be like four of them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LOL, you are right! But, the CFA-44's design is the most realistic of all the Superplanes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eh, actually I was going to go with the X-02, because the Switchblade concept has been proposed and made it to the drawing board, it'll be a few years until we see it implemented.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, PAK-FA and CFA-44 bear some-type of resemblance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Well they did base the CFA off of the PAK-FA
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Maybe the front end and the tails, but that's about it.
Two completely different aircraft for completely different missions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Also a bit of the delta wings, and the stealth, maneuverability, the thrust vectoring to a certain extent, and use of the Russian PA. I think it is a mix of a PAK-FA with a Su-33 or a Su-37. Maybe all three of them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I can see where you are coming from, I was going to say it's a mix of the FA and the 35. That's about it really though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I sometimes use the F-18, if I get bored with CFA-44, mostly because of this scene. [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I love the Hornet, because it's stable, and agile at the same time, plus it's armor is quite good. Plus the weapons loadout is good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Plane is overrated.
Highly. Overrated.
I eat this thing as a snack.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's too easy to shoot down. It takes maybe a two second burst of cannon fire to shoot down, and those people who fly it cannot handle it at all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Those people have probably not have AC6, probably use DFM with it, it depends how good you are, because I shoot down F-22As in a Su-24MP.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I will admit that in AC6 is was overpowered, and it was fairly easy to use. (Let's face it, 90% of the time people beat it on Ace with the CFA)
Shooting down F-22As is quite easy, done it before in the Harrier II Plus. Hard to find decent people to dogfight these days.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, but they even it for Mulitplayer by removing the ADMMs and weakening them for AC:AH.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No one uses the ADMMs anymore. Takes too long to get a full lock unless you are targeting a base in Domination or the main targets outright in Capital Conquest, which by then you are easy targets for people like me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, I stick to the ECMP and EMLs. But, it is still fun to watch someones reaction when 12 missiles at their way, in an attacker or bomber, of course, but sometimes a fighter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Outmaneuvering those missiles is rather easy, and singly those missiles do little to no damage. I just think the CFA is the mount of noobs.
I just don't use it at all. I stick to my Rafale M.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IDK, I just LOVE its stats, all about maneuverability, little defense, high speed, high firepower, and extremely low stability. It just depends how you use it, because it attracts noobs, but it is meant for a technology-minded ace, *cough* Pasternak *cough*.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not everything is about maneuverability. I've managed to just outfly poorly trained pilots in this game, and I use the ground as cover too. Especially with helicopters.
I guess you have to like the Nosferatu to fly it. I just don't like it really. 
Watching noobs fly around in it without any sense as to what they are doing really annoys me to no end.
I personally enjoy aircraft such as the Super Hornet, the Gripen, Rafale, and others because they are well balanced across the board and now just heavily sided with firepower and agility.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And that is fine, I just like CFA-44 because I am familiar with it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>