Comments: 21
miirex [2017-03-31 14:54:26 +0000 UTC]
Fajny samolot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Konrad22 In reply to miirex [2017-04-02 19:38:06 +0000 UTC]
W porównaniu ze współczesnymi samolotami bojowymi to maleństwo. Osiągi też nieporównywalne, ale wbrew metryce, w sprawnych rękach, potrafi zadziwić widza.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Konrad22 In reply to miirex [2017-04-05 17:50:19 +0000 UTC]
Tak, ale nie ze wszystkimi samolotami sztuczki są możliwe, np. nowsze, w porównaniu do MiG'a-15, MiGi-21 są dużo mniej zwrotne za to zdecydowanie szybsze. One przemkną, ale już nie są tak efektowne, chociaż doświadczony pilot też może co nieco publiczności pokazać.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
miirex In reply to Konrad22 [2017-04-06 17:51:25 +0000 UTC]
No tak, niemniej jednak jak mówisz zawsze się znajdzie jakiś magik i uczyni coś niezwykłego.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yamikou [2017-03-31 02:07:49 +0000 UTC]
This is really that awesome, you've got some good talents! Keep it up!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Konrad22 In reply to Yamikou [2017-04-02 19:39:05 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I will.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Driglok [2017-03-31 01:52:49 +0000 UTC]
A two-seater? Is this a trainer aircraft?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Konrad22 In reply to Driglok [2017-04-02 19:41:13 +0000 UTC]
Yes it is. It was as a final stage trainer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cullyferg2010 [2017-03-31 01:44:15 +0000 UTC]
On par with the F-86 Sabre, and both protégés and kindred spirits of German technology.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Konrad22 In reply to cullyferg2010 [2017-04-02 19:47:29 +0000 UTC]
That is almost right. Both planes were created based on German experience. The problem with MiG-15 is that at the begining it could not fly without British Rols-Royce engine. So there is a lot of German and British spirit in it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to Konrad22 [2017-04-02 22:55:59 +0000 UTC]
True, since the British gave them the Rolls-Royce Nene engine for their participation in the 'Great Patriotic War.' The only problem with the engine, since it was based off of Frank Whittle's design, you couldn't increase the compression of the incoming air without enlarging the compressor. General Electric that was first producing the jet engines for the American military took the German route and added compressor disks of similar size. Even though this lengthen the engine's shape, it was easier to make the aircraft longer than fatter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Alan-the-leopard [2017-03-30 16:25:52 +0000 UTC]
It looks like a toy plane rather than like a combat plane X)
Nice take anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Konrad22 In reply to Alan-the-leopard [2017-03-30 16:38:06 +0000 UTC]
Yes! It is small, but nice looking in the air. I've seen it flying low (just few meters above the airfield) and fast. It was incredible. One could feel she is a fighter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Konrad22 In reply to Konrad22 [2017-03-30 17:08:07 +0000 UTC]
and Thanks! I'm glad you like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hellbat [2017-03-30 16:18:27 +0000 UTC]
Nice! Looks so small compared to some todays fighters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Konrad22 In reply to hellbat [2017-03-30 16:43:12 +0000 UTC]
It is really small. It can be compared with II w.w. fighters, not the modern one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Konrad22 In reply to hellbat [2017-04-06 19:33:19 +0000 UTC]
Yes, especially the need for speed at the expense of maneuverability (eg. MIG-21,23, Su-22).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1