TheMaidenInBlack [2015-07-03 21:47:17 +0000 UTC]
A critique for you from theWrittenRevolution .
My main issue with this short introduction I think is how your sentences are weirdly structured and "disconnected" between each other in a paragraph. An example of the first instance:
Socrates was never one to rise early in the morning, but the rare chance of enjoying civilized violence in the arena, especially when his friend was on land as well, he simply could not miss.
It reads weirdly, and it makes one go back to reread the sentence because it's not structured logically - punctuation is part of the reason why, too. I get the gist of what you say, the meaning is clear enough, but the sentence is unnecessarily complicated and just not how you would write the situation. A simple rewrite:
Socrates had never enjoyed rising early in the morning, but he couldn't miss the rare chance of enjoying civilized violence in the arena -- especially when his friend was on land also.
MUCH clearer. The actions and situations follow one another logically and one needn't jump back and forth between the sentence to get the full meaning of it. You need to analyse your work and edit it so that things aren't as hard to follow.
In regards to "disconnection" within a paragraph, let me show you an example:
The two captains rarely had an opportunity to spend time with friends these days. Dealing with pirates, smugglers and ceremonies became a constant routine for every captain of the navy. What was left of their time after that was usually spent on crew discipline.
You divided this into three "parts", with your periods, but it would read more fluid if you kept it more together: after all, the subject is still the same and those three sentences are heavily connected with one another. Plus, short sentences result choppy the longer their sequence becomes. Improved example:
The two captains rarely had an opportunity to spend time with friends these days: dealing with pirates, smugglers and ceremonies was a constant routing for all captains of the navy, and what was left of their time after that was usually spent on crew discipline.
Follows logically, is nice and put together, one single simple structure. Do you see what I mean, and how it improves the story itself?
Some other sentence structure that is really just weird:
At least a knot taller than the tallest sailor on the ship, very muscular yet slim, short black hair and hawk-like eyes were this man's most apparent features.
Grammatically speaking, this is how the sentence should go to be the most easily readable and immediate: At least a knot taller than the tallest sailor on the ship, muscular yet slim (NB: VERY MUSCULAR makes me think of a body builder. Very muscular can't be slim. So the "very" must go), short black hair and a hawk's eyes; these were the man's most apparent features, and he made quite an impression on all of Socrates' crew.
I added something of my own in there, because if you want to spend time describing him, there has to be a reason for it since Socrates has already seen him in the arena so technically, he already knows what he looks like.
So all the above means: I think you need to work on your sentence structure and "cohesion" (the way your separate sentences fit together). I don't know if you were aiming for a more "constructed" feel with your story, like older English tends to be, but if you were, in this case it feels hard to read instead of Old English (which is hard to read, indeed, but in its own way).
On to other things... the characters are interesting enough, and the names you chose are pretty funny: I have no idea if they were common names in their era, but I would research that if I were you. There's always the history geek who'll come out and say "hey, those names were actually pretty unique, not anyone had them" since they are famous ones. (: do your homework on them! Oh also "Fishy" is the funniest name ever. I liked that.
You put a nice cliffhanger at the end, so yes, it succeeds at making people want to read more I think. Of course we can't know why the arena guy came on the ship, but it sounds like he'll explain it soon, to the captain at least.
In regards to improvement or not from your previous works, I sadly can't say since this is the first I read. But I commented on your style lots already, so I don't feel like I need to add much more on it. (:
One last thing: -„ Captain on deck! “ – you don't need both the - and " when opening and closing a dialogue. Only one of the two, as long as it's the same opening and closing.
Keep writing and experimenting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1