Comments: 10
GiantMutantCoconuts [2008-02-20 20:46:26 +0000 UTC]
For the most part, very well done. You did change the flow a bit from the beginning to the end, but it still sounds nice. The only thing I felt a bit confused over was the fire.
The only thing I didn't catch onto was the fire. You had mentioned before the character's inability to breathe, with the lack of oxygen. I don't think a fire could grow that large without a sufficient source of oxygen to fuel it.
This is, however, unless there really is oxygen in the room, and the character is too crazy to realize it. Or maybe I'm reading too much into things. Overall though, pretty well done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Stabox [2008-02-20 05:40:04 +0000 UTC]
Wow, I love your style of writing! Sorry I can't critique though... My level of writing isn't high enough for that ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HikariPegasus In reply to Stabox [2008-02-21 02:27:44 +0000 UTC]
Artsy should know how to critique. x:
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
faithinforever [2008-02-20 05:10:13 +0000 UTC]
I enjoyed the imagery of this piece. It leaves a lot of open ended questions, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing, it just encourages the reader to use his/her own imagination
'I assume I ended up just looking like a fool to any critters that were watching me in my tiny cell.' The word critters doesn't seem to fit right to me. I don't think it flows with the rest of the style of the piece, my suggestion would be just to say: I assume I ended up looking a fool, even to the casual observer? Or looking a fool to anyone, or anything, watching me in my tiny cell?
Also the tense of the piece seems a little conflicting at times for example, 'I must have, but I suppose that’s where my memory kept failing me' I suppose being current context and kept being past context. There are a few things like this throughout that, if cleaned up, would make it a lot smoother to read.
Just my two cents anyway, let me know if you have any questions
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HikariPegasus In reply to faithinforever [2008-02-20 05:13:20 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for pointing that out, I actually stopped at that one sentence for a couple minutes and just looked at it. I changed from the past tense to the present tense, and I tried to fix it up, but I guess I missed a bit.
As for the whole beginning, that was way off from what I was thinking in the end. My friend encouraged me to just start writing and read it over and turn it into something more. About a quarter down the page I started developing the plot (if there really is one at all), so that's why it's a bit different.
Thanks again for the comment~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
redjello979 [2008-02-20 05:01:57 +0000 UTC]
i guess it's alright. what did you write this for? class or freewrite? i would like to suggest using fewer passive verbs such as was, had, do, etc. also try breaking up some of the really long sentences. there may be a run-on in there if i'm not mistaken. furthermore, word variety would be nice. you tend to overuse the words "as" and "like". another thing you can improve on is depth. mix things up in your writing by throwing in figurative language (metaphors, similes, symbols, etc.).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
HikariPegasus In reply to redjello979 [2008-02-20 05:09:07 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, yeah it wasn't for anything in particular, just felt like writing. It's been a while since I just threw ideas out on paper, so I wanted to get my creative juices flowing with this.
Thanks for the tips. I'll definetely try for all that next time~
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thebadguysagirl [2008-02-20 04:58:46 +0000 UTC]
its great! really has a great hook and keeps you reading till the end! love it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lone-wolf49 [2008-02-20 04:56:40 +0000 UTC]
I loved it! The description was beautiful, and I loved the imagery of the character in flames. Excellent job, and I hope you write more.
Sorry if it's not really 'Advanced Critique,' but it's better than nothing.
Plus I wanted first comment =x
👍: 0 ⏩: 0