Comments: 12
yippskee [2012-10-01 21:49:30 +0000 UTC]
very cool
π: 0 β©: 1
alexanderlindelof [2012-10-01 18:50:37 +0000 UTC]
This is really a very nice film, one of my favourites.
I recommend also trying the new Portra 160, in my view much better than the old 160, better grain, more colorful and yet neutral skin tones.
I also love the new Kodak Ektar 100.
π: 0 β©: 1
alexanderlindelof In reply to HaruNiji [2012-10-03 07:54:22 +0000 UTC]
In B&W I have tried TMax 100, Ilford Delta 100 and I think also 400 but I'm not sure right now. It was all in 35mm format and it was only for testing. I have some of these in 120 also, but I have not yet shot any b&w middle format. I think some images can really get better in b&w and I would like to experiment more with it, but I would categorize myself as a color shooter.
I have tried Portra 160 NC too and I have seen amazing photos with the 160 NC version, but my own shots with it was disappointing. It might have to do with the light meter in that camera though, cause the last rolls I've shot with it seem to have been very underexposed. Perhaps time to change battery for the meter...
Yes, the Ektar 100 is probably not the first choice for skin tones, unless one is seeking that particular effect.
π: 0 β©: 1
HaruNiji In reply to alexanderlindelof [2012-10-05 01:14:27 +0000 UTC]
Tmax is great and so is ilford (has more range of BW as they make B&W exclusively) depending on what you're trying to achieve.. what camera(s) do you use ? I like to change the backs or shoot both B&W and colour when I am shooting 120/220, something are surreal in B&W but I also like colour.
Oh that's unusual, could be the meter ( I am assuming you were using available light ?), I shot this with NC [link]
You're right, I shot some of people and I kinda liked them in ektar (documentary style a bit- like chrome saturated films-) but yeah not for everything for sure.
π: 0 β©: 1
alexanderlindelof In reply to HaruNiji [2012-10-05 22:16:12 +0000 UTC]
For 120 film I use Fuji GW690 II (6x9) and Fuji GA645Zi (645), and for 135 film I use Pentax MG (my favourite because of the huge viewfinder, Canon 1V or Nikon F75). I have occasionally also used old bellow cameras like Zeiss Ikon. They are very fun to use, but I have not yet found and used any in good condition. I'm thinking of buying one in good condition from www.certo6.com
Yes, available light. Yes, I saw that image when I was browsing your gallery. I like it a lot, the pose and the model, very natural look, very nice.
There is a special look to film that's just not there in digital. I recently compared Ektar 100 in my 6x9 middle format camera with Canon 5D mk II and Nikons new D800E. The overall look of the analog image was better, even the owner of the D800E agreed. The level of detail on a pixel level in the D800E image was very impressive though.
π: 0 β©: 1
alexanderlindelof In reply to HaruNiji [2012-10-07 17:22:40 +0000 UTC]
If you want a middle format camera that is very easy to carry and use I would highly recommend the Fuji GA645Zi. Fully automatic and very light weight. Negs are only half the size of GW690, but it is still three times the size of 35mm neg, if you crop the 35mm neg to same aspect ratio as the 645 (3:4 instead of 2:3). A real big difference in quality compared to 35mm. It can even zoom between 35-55mm (35mm equivalent).
π: 0 β©: 1
HaruNiji In reply to alexanderlindelof [2012-10-09 10:03:17 +0000 UTC]
Unfortunately, GA645Zi is more expensive than GW690 and smaller :/ neither in my price range at the moment, I don't know if I am going to get a new nikon f100 to replace my broken one, but I am thinking of Kiev since they have cheap cameras and the results I have seen were good, do you know much about them ?
π: 0 β©: 1