Comments: 9
aupre [2012-12-06 05:08:57 +0000 UTC]
wack
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thomas-Koidhis [2012-06-12 01:37:24 +0000 UTC]
You have dipped a teacup into the ocean of novel vision and share its bounty for all of us while we sit in awe as to how you accessed such an ocean in the first place. Beautiful piece!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oneironautik [2010-11-11 06:32:07 +0000 UTC]
What would happen if there's only one element missing?
I think, this brilliant picture had never been painted. (Ohh, a paradoxon ^^)
We owe her everything!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bananaspazz [2009-01-31 02:29:33 +0000 UTC]
I don't know how you did it, but the figure looks so much like a woman, that I didn't even give it a second thought. I actually had look at it longer to see just how unique those shapes are, and how successfully you portrayed the human figure without actually using any human body parts. Great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gyurka In reply to bananaspazz [2009-01-31 06:42:36 +0000 UTC]
thank you much
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Seahorse-61 [2009-01-28 19:56:59 +0000 UTC]
I love the feminity of it ; D
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gyurka In reply to j0rosa [2009-01-27 18:19:56 +0000 UTC]
Thank you much. Present as always!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0