Comments: 26
xDustinaKeeney [2009-12-05 22:59:04 +0000 UTC]
:L maybe no elena kalis or nikon 40d, but its a wonderful photo all the same!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
CitrusEcstasy---x [2009-12-03 19:36:53 +0000 UTC]
hahaha i love it! the colours are great, the blur doesn't make a difference to the quality of the photo, i still love it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RebeccaIsLeft [2009-12-02 19:39:39 +0000 UTC]
It has an effect... The quality suits it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
annie-tony [2009-11-29 15:43:11 +0000 UTC]
I like it!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shaydesmar [2009-11-28 18:42:29 +0000 UTC]
that's good, even for a disposable (like i would know? i haven't even finished the film on my underwater one) but yeah, it's cool. i like the reflection bitty as well. that never works for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
golddfische In reply to Shaydesmar [2009-11-28 20:15:36 +0000 UTC]
i wish i'd done more actually underwater. i only took like four underwater photos, mostly i used it just as an above-water camera which wouldn't mind getting wet. but the underwater ones actually turned out not so bad :L
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shaydesmar In reply to golddfische [2009-11-28 20:39:30 +0000 UTC]
hm. yeah the last time i used it, i left it on the beach when i went swimming...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shaydesmar In reply to golddfische [2009-12-03 17:30:34 +0000 UTC]
no, i left it with sheen or someone on the beach - last year or whatevz - not thinking that i could take pictures with it. i was scared of losing it in the waves.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shaydesmar In reply to golddfische [2009-12-05 10:53:08 +0000 UTC]
yeah, mine did as well. i guess i was a bit paranoid for its safety...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
golddfische In reply to Shaydesmar [2009-12-05 10:56:46 +0000 UTC]
i went all-out, took it about a metre down :L
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Iris448 [2009-11-28 15:56:39 +0000 UTC]
I think that the quality makes it more effective.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1