HOME | DD

FutureDami — Terry - 622

Published: 2011-07-19 15:57:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 2855; Favourites: 38; Downloads: 19
Redirect to original
Description Terry is the best blaxploitation karate stunt driver supermodel in the business. She is also approximately 9 feet tall and highly skilled at placing the star on top the the tree come xmas time. Her hair has been classified as a national treasure, the 14th wonder of the world, and 'freakin awesome' by noted scientists.

She is the only member of the 'Avenging Angels' to have finished a book, including Bosley. Her special moves take advantage of her amazon stature with leg sweeps and high kicks that test the structural integrity of her polyester jumpsuit.

Her chain decimation finisher: Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Blacksplash, will shatter the floor causing all opponents to run like sucka-ass chumps.
Related content
Comments: 28

virginboi [2013-12-31 22:07:52 +0000 UTC]

i couldn't believe all that afro could fit inside a dirtbike helmut.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SapphireGamgee [2013-12-07 12:10:10 +0000 UTC]

Funnily enough, of all the 'actresses', she seemed to be the only one who was actually trying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AramBison [2012-06-25 20:30:11 +0000 UTC]

I hope the other angels pop up when using special attacks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NO-SoupForYou In reply to AramBison [2013-12-23 23:23:40 +0000 UTC]

Pop up?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GilmourApatosaur [2011-08-02 17:18:34 +0000 UTC]

Fame = Trustworthy
Man this movie was painful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NO-SoupForYou In reply to GilmourApatosaur [2013-12-23 23:24:25 +0000 UTC]

Yeah.  How many Peter Lawford's did the meter register?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kev1000 [2011-07-20 14:11:27 +0000 UTC]

Man, that Terry's one bad mutha ---

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PiccoloSky In reply to kev1000 [2011-07-21 04:02:25 +0000 UTC]

Shut yo' mouth!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wherethefishlives [2011-07-19 21:33:08 +0000 UTC]

i always thought she was the cutest of any of the characters, although the movie was so bad i couldn't finish it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FutureDami [2011-07-19 20:47:21 +0000 UTC]

The amazing mysogyny of the open credits floors me. The men are all "stars" and the women... who were the entire focus of the plot... "co-stars"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

halnarthax87 In reply to FutureDami [2011-12-08 06:07:26 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, but only because they were established stars... from a decade earlier at least. The women were pretty much unknowns, and this movie ensured they'd stay unknown.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

halnarthax87 [2011-07-19 18:41:40 +0000 UTC]

She's an arachnid!
Actually, compared to the others she was probably the most credible character.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jhaumann [2011-07-19 18:32:56 +0000 UTC]

Not to mention she was also adept at ruining Pat Buttram's artifical hip and crunching up Jim Backus's hand like an empty beer can. Seriously it was as much of a reunion of actors from 1960s sitcoms as it was a ripoff of Charlie's Angels.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PiccoloSky [2011-07-19 18:18:11 +0000 UTC]

I can imagine this one was really tough...which "Angel" to do. I always thought it was kind of funny that their little book-club/drug-busting-vigilante group decided to get custom-tailored uniforms that made them rather conspicuous...especially since they were only supposed to be doing one one "hit".

"We got rid of all the drugs in the world!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

inthecaseoflove [2011-07-19 16:42:01 +0000 UTC]

what movie is she from?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FutureDami In reply to inthecaseoflove [2011-07-19 16:47:29 +0000 UTC]

Angel's Revenge, #622

She was on screen the entire movie but of course she got like... 5 lines. They were making fun of that with Gypsy in "Chocolate Jones and the Temple of Funk"

I was looking at some of Greydon Clark's other films... man, what a dirtbag!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

inthecaseoflove In reply to FutureDami [2011-07-19 16:50:13 +0000 UTC]

I haven't seen that one yet or heard of it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FutureDami In reply to inthecaseoflove [2011-07-19 16:54:43 +0000 UTC]

Its a pretty hillarious one. Very VERY 70s.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

inthecaseoflove In reply to FutureDami [2011-07-19 17:30:41 +0000 UTC]

now I have to watch it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

punisherfan1138 In reply to inthecaseoflove [2011-07-20 18:53:32 +0000 UTC]

It's all kinds of wonderful.
*Obvious knock-off of CHARLIE'S ANGELS
*Horrible acting
*Tries to be empowering but comes off sexist/misogynistic
*Cringe-inducing performances by has-been actors
*Zany sounds effects during the fight scenes!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

inthecaseoflove In reply to punisherfan1138 [2011-07-20 19:15:20 +0000 UTC]

sounds like it's from the 70's

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

punisherfan1138 In reply to inthecaseoflove [2011-07-22 14:09:00 +0000 UTC]

This movie is pure condensed 70s. Just add water.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SyddyGurl In reply to punisherfan1138 [2011-07-22 23:05:03 +0000 UTC]

....and shine your love!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

punisherfan1138 In reply to SyddyGurl [2011-07-23 04:53:25 +0000 UTC]

Yes but that's really more of a suggestion, like "repeat" on the shampoo bottle.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SyddyGurl In reply to punisherfan1138 [2011-07-26 16:07:24 +0000 UTC]

LOL!

"HOW'S ABOUT SHINING MY STEAK OVER HERE!!!!"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

punisherfan1138 In reply to SyddyGurl [2011-07-28 00:52:55 +0000 UTC]

"I-I buffed my love once."

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

inthecaseoflove In reply to punisherfan1138 [2011-07-22 16:03:24 +0000 UTC]

XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

punisherfan1138 In reply to inthecaseoflove [2011-07-23 04:53:40 +0000 UTC]

Enjoy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0