HOME | DD

francis001 โ€” soldier bot

Published: 2009-10-24 06:21:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 11636; Favourites: 170; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description One of the images from my Extreme Worlds art book. Why the long face? ehehe
Related content
Comments: 28

carnivore-art [2009-10-28 07:40:03 +0000 UTC]

This is wonderful I really like the design of the head as well as the weapon. However, in a personal opinion I don't really feel that the nose and the pupils fit this design particularly. Everything else is really awesome.

And I want pants like that

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to carnivore-art [2009-11-15 01:20:15 +0000 UTC]

thanks! and thanks for the feedback.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

DarkClone [2009-10-26 12:53:11 +0000 UTC]

The blue outline you gave the figure gave it a much funky look. I love it!!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

BrenGun [2009-10-25 17:54:07 +0000 UTC]

wow really great!!!!!!!!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Pachycrocuta [2009-10-25 14:52:07 +0000 UTC]

The whole thing is very subtle - I'm used to really robotic, robot characters. Between the mostly-human look and the uniform, it makes me wonder whether you were trying for a more "Appleseed" type of robot.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to Pachycrocuta [2009-11-15 01:20:56 +0000 UTC]

I think so, something almost more cyborg rather than typical robot.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

LEQUARK [2009-10-25 01:54:33 +0000 UTC]

trรจs beau travail de calques!...

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Morgalahan [2009-10-24 20:12:04 +0000 UTC]

hehe, awesomeness, I will have this book, mark my words

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Max-CCCP [2009-10-24 16:35:59 +0000 UTC]

superd

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

MMKH [2009-10-24 14:59:20 +0000 UTC]

Very cool, and I like the background.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

AprilMcGuire [2009-10-24 14:25:56 +0000 UTC]

What I like most about this is that the background seems to be abstract, but still show a great amount of depth and dimension. This is something I need to learn to do! wonderful indeed

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to AprilMcGuire [2009-11-15 01:22:54 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

TrajediJill [2009-10-24 14:20:05 +0000 UTC]

I like the over all details in this but I have to agree the gun is lack luster. It needs to be more detailed. His armor has nice texture and little something somethings. But the gun is blah.

You don't need to change the design of the gun but just give it more life.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to TrajediJill [2009-11-15 01:21:17 +0000 UTC]

cool, thanks for the feedback!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

SMerle [2009-10-24 13:51:57 +0000 UTC]

awesome! made me chuckle with that long face. great job.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to SMerle [2009-11-15 01:21:27 +0000 UTC]

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Rustyoldtown [2009-10-24 13:38:19 +0000 UTC]

Why do robots wear trousers?
Is it to hide their...ahem...atachments!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to Rustyoldtown [2009-11-15 01:21:50 +0000 UTC]

haha! maybe to protect the paint job.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

Rustyoldtown In reply to francis001 [2009-11-15 20:50:58 +0000 UTC]

I didn't think of that!
The last thing a heavily armed robot wants is a mechanic asking them to drop their trousers so he can give them a paint job!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Wytherwing [2009-10-24 10:28:39 +0000 UTC]

very cool!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

warpiggg [2009-10-24 07:20:14 +0000 UTC]

Love it, love it, love it! Clever use of the cyan colour, does wonders for the orange

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to warpiggg [2009-11-15 01:23:10 +0000 UTC]

thank you!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

Mr--Jack [2009-10-24 07:15:55 +0000 UTC]

really nice and crisp! Great subtle stylisation going on there

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to Mr--Jack [2009-11-15 01:23:29 +0000 UTC]

thanks man! yeah went for a bit more cartoony than usual.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

keight [2009-10-24 06:47:28 +0000 UTC]

Nice, Francis. I really like your use of texture in this.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to keight [2009-11-15 01:23:38 +0000 UTC]

thanks very much!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0

EveLWillow [2009-10-24 06:29:09 +0000 UTC]

Is it just me or is the Gun a tad ... Under-cooked.

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 1

francis001 In reply to EveLWillow [2009-11-15 01:23:59 +0000 UTC]

well a couple of people have pointed that out, so not just you!

๐Ÿ‘: 0 โฉ: 0