Comments: 25
TheCreepypastaz [2014-09-12 23:25:05 +0000 UTC]
actually, the numbers stand for a famous code, the numbers 1-26 are a-b, and the numbers that are over 26 have you noticed, are actually multiples of 3 if you divide they all go to 1-26 and once again the 1-26 is a-b
get it?
π: 0 β©: 1
foxery In reply to TheCreepypastaz [2014-09-15 21:20:11 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure that's the encryption that was used for Surveillance but it's interesting nonetheless.Β
π: 0 β©: 2
TheCreepypastaz In reply to foxery [2014-09-16 22:25:19 +0000 UTC]
I mostly got "listen"
"too late"
and
"operator"
π: 0 β©: 1
foxery In reply to TheCreepypastaz [2014-09-17 14:51:33 +0000 UTC]
That's an interesting result--perhaps we aren't talking about the same set of numbers? The particular sequences everyone was trying to figure out when I drew this were the ones starting at 0:42 of the Surveillance video as well as the tweet posted around the same time. They ended up translating toΒ "TRULYYOURFAULT",Β "SHESOUTTHERE", andΒ "IAMWATCHING".
π: 0 β©: 1
TheCreepypastaz In reply to foxery [2014-09-17 21:46:34 +0000 UTC]
exactly!
and then there is also another one.
the is also the audiographs...
if you run some distortion through audiographs you get "listen" or "he waits no longer"
π: 0 β©: 0
TheCreepypastaz In reply to foxery [2014-09-15 22:20:01 +0000 UTC]
well, it came out correctly when I used it...
π: 0 β©: 0
JazzminTH22 [2014-03-31 05:01:21 +0000 UTC]
Looks like me doing math homework...
π: 0 β©: 0
Reduxist [2013-02-27 04:13:42 +0000 UTC]
What exactly was the code, anyways?
π: 0 β©: 1
foxery In reply to Reduxist [2013-02-28 05:35:55 +0000 UTC]
after many weeks of headaching the Unfictioners figured out:
"TRULYYOURFAULT"
"SHESOUTTHERE"
and then the twitter code:
"IAMWATCHING"
nothing super significant other than the implication that Jessica is still alive and out there 8)
π: 0 β©: 1
Reduxist In reply to foxery [2013-02-28 17:33:43 +0000 UTC]
Wow. So there's hope after all? Maybe Hoodie IS Jessica?
π: 0 β©: 2
TheCreepypastaz In reply to Reduxist [2014-09-12 23:25:36 +0000 UTC]
its unlikely,
hoodie doenst have boobs.
π: 0 β©: 0
foxery In reply to Reduxist [2013-02-28 17:44:56 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm, personally I think it's unlikely since it's apparent that Hoody is behind the TTA videos, and the fact that there was no new footage of Jessica in Surveillance (it was all taken from previous entries) seems to imply that TTA doesn't know where she is either. My favourite theory is that Hoody is Brian :0
π: 0 β©: 1
Reduxist In reply to foxery [2013-03-02 08:38:21 +0000 UTC]
Well, J did theorize that TTA could be multiple people on the same account. Not to mention, Masky!Tim and Hoodie seem to work well together. Hoodie turned Tim back INTO Masky... Maybe it wasn't just to get Tim and J to work together, but to bring Masky back as a TTA collaborator?
π: 0 β©: 0
august-ocean [2013-01-29 06:43:40 +0000 UTC]
This is great! Mind if I take a crack at coloring it?
π: 0 β©: 1
foxery In reply to august-ocean [2013-01-29 20:30:29 +0000 UTC]
No problem! Just remember to credit, and let me know if you do it cause I want to seeee :0
π: 0 β©: 1
foxery In reply to august-ocean [2013-01-30 14:50:25 +0000 UTC]
Ahaha awesome!! :'D it looks great!
π: 0 β©: 0
OsmiumMachine [2013-01-25 22:39:52 +0000 UTC]
The code has been cracked!
BTW, your art reminds me of Scott Pilgrim.
π: 0 β©: 1
foxery In reply to OsmiumMachine [2013-01-26 16:57:33 +0000 UTC]
Indeed it has! :b at the time of drawing this it was yet unsolved and quite relevant to the state of the fandom haha. and you're right, the style of this is reminiscent of scott pilgrim o:
π: 0 β©: 1
OsmiumMachine In reply to foxery [2013-01-26 17:52:35 +0000 UTC]
I know that. But no one else on the comments page said it, so I had first dibs.
Well, I like your art anyway.
π: 0 β©: 1
foxery In reply to OsmiumMachine [2013-01-29 03:43:51 +0000 UTC]
ahah I see. Thank you!
π: 0 β©: 0
snekdoodsart [2013-01-20 06:14:47 +0000 UTC]
yes good
yes you are back
yes.
π: 0 β©: 1
foxery In reply to snekdoodsart [2013-01-20 21:59:47 +0000 UTC]
BUT YOU SEE ME ON TUMBLR LIKE ALL THE TIME LOL
π: 0 β©: 1
snekdoodsart In reply to foxery [2013-01-20 22:36:44 +0000 UTC]
I KNOW BUT STILL
π: 0 β©: 0