Comments: 33
Coidzy [2006-10-24 01:06:39 +0000 UTC]
Neil Gaimen, much, eh? Hehe. Nice retro-interpret thar.
I'm a bit disturbed by this piece though... It's as if you've somehow made a bow so much like a butterfly you intentionally wanted to drive anyone who looked at her crotch mad from trying to figure out if that's a bow or a butterfly emblem...
In all seriousness though, what happened with the shading of the palette in regards to her foot and ankle-wear? It seems a rather stark deviation from the flavor of the rest of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-10-24 05:25:02 +0000 UTC]
physically based or just personality-wise?
...ah. Funny how I noticed a bow on the crotch and yet not the boobs. you'd think I'd notice both or not pay attention to both... strange.
I definitely can see the texture used in the corset/brassiere type deal...
The shoes were just almost blindingly red at the time, so I guess they're about right then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-10-24 06:06:24 +0000 UTC]
hmm, I've always wanted to see a horny girl, never heard anyone admit to having horns before though. What style are we talking here? goat? deer? cowish? ramsish?
auburn's always been a nice color, if I do say so.
Not really, I've been traumatized by too many girls whose breasts were either too sensitive to explore or a pretty much complete waste of time to try and stimulate. Which isn't saying much given the number of partners I've had, but, "eh." If a girl can be traumatized by one bad experience where the mitigating circumstances are obvious, then, damnit, I can too via attrition.
aye, you did right in regards to texture. Especially with the garter-end-tops of the stockings...
ah, yeah, a bit of "shine"/lensflare-bit/reflectioning would've definitely helped cement the deal...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-10-24 07:03:27 +0000 UTC]
hmm, sounds rather nice. How'd you come across and end up collecting the pair?
agreed about the auburn prettiness.
err, what depends on the girl again?
Well, I guess you'll just have to settle for knowing what it truly looks like whilst us peons whose only connection is via the internets have to enjoy a less than intimately detailed facsimilie.
Another little checkbox on the master list, neh?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fhqwhgus In reply to Coidzy [2006-10-24 12:49:19 +0000 UTC]
I just finally broke down and bought the black ones one year. Then they got lost, so I bought the other ones. But then, the first pair was found. And now I have two.
What manner of... interest... she preferred and where that interest lay.
I was very tempted to repost this in a larger size. Ah well. I can give you zoomed details, if you wish to see anything closer up..?
Always. And now Kel wishes me to work on a project with her... but real art. Ooh! It sounds wonderful, though! But I'm going to have to take a Tuesday out of November to sit around and sketch things at the O-town Science Center... preserved dead things, no less.
But I've never sketched the dead before, so that sound be terribly interesting! I hope they let me in with a sketchbook. I'd be pretty pissed off otherwise... to have my one (and possibly only) chance at sketching in insides of real people!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fhqwhgus In reply to Coidzy [2006-10-26 20:24:26 +0000 UTC]
The first pair are awesome, too. Although, I've lost them again. They kind of curl at the end, which is sort of repeats the natural curls in my hair gets (I get little sweat curls around my face when it's hot out... very cherubic... very irritating.) Plus the black semi-gloss paint really stands out well from the blonde.
The interest of the girl... er, reference to the boob comment some comments back. It depends on the girl whether she has interest in someone else's interest in her boobs.
I just post things in a size that I can see either the totality or at least the majority of the pic on the screen (so, if I increased the size of my screen, it probably would have been a larger picture.) Probably the lace on her corset... that seems the more interesting thing that was kind of lost to the reduction of size. Unfortunately, I saved the photoshop version at 800px, so, that's all she wrote.
Yeah, well, anime is more commercial art... instead of "real," I should have used the adjective, "fine," as that's more correct. I just consider all of this crap to be concept art anyhow... since nothing of mine has ever been published.
Ah, you know, I've lived her for more than a year, and I've never been to the Science Center. But then, I'm spoiled by the Gainesville museums. They're all free entry, although if I ever have a dollar or two, I end up slipping that into the donation box whenever I visit.
Yeah, I'm thinking "security" would keep me from sketching things. And probably most important, since they are showing real people (well, parts of real people) there might be some concerns about the wishes of the family of the deceased. Sometimes, people are hesitant to allow pictures of the insides of their loved ones to be published, even if it's not via photographs. I really hope it doesn't turn into an issue, though.
This might sound really bizarre, but I've been hoping for the opportunity to draw the insides of people for the longest time. Not just drawing from drawing or from pictures posted in a science magazine or rottendotcom or whatever... but actually being able to see things myself. Or maybe I'm just one of those random, morbid fucks that likes to look at corpses?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-10-26 23:04:03 +0000 UTC]
Hmm, I'm starting a-noticing a bit of a trend here with you losing horny things....
(Most cherubic things are also irritating or annoying. A bit of an odd thing about life) Sounds like a nice accessory to accentuate the package and ensemble with...
You mean whether she'd take pleasure in receiving attention there physically or would like the idea/practice of it pyschologically? You're being a bit convoluted here, Or else I'm confused...
So, basically, you render it in the size that best fits the screen, so that someone can view the entire piece, as opposed to uploading such a large visual file that when zoomed in, only segments of the piece are visible at a time in dA format?
So what exactly is this commercial art project going to entail, or am I not allowed to know as it's far too sensitive for a random person to get even a whiff of a hint of it? Or are you saying you're embarking upon the creation of some kind of fine art programme? Technically, everything on this website you've posted is published. But I get what ya mean. But with art being published isn't 'xactly the same sort of ball and widgit as with writing.
I mean, to really be published, either you'd have to get enough fame or notoriety through your collection of works or a specific work, and that's a lengthy process or just dumb luck of the draw. It's mostly all about the commissions though, if I recall correctly, no? Unless you're talking about working as an illustrator in some industry....
One of the biggest things about our government that I dislike is our disregard for cultivating culture and the lack of subsidies for the arts while giving ungodly kickbacks to the rich who, more and more often, only squabble over and try to get the works of old masters rather than do that whole patronage thing. And then there's the distinct dearth of museums...
Somehow I doubt anyone would connect a sketchbook with the whole insides of the anatomy thing going into the place. That's more something that might come up if y'know, a number of people see you and are disturbed enough to alert the establishment. Then it's more of a thing where the people around you are considering you a nuisance than an actual... rules and regulations type thing.
Not that there's probably much real difference. But I think the really disturbing thing is if they would actually display a carved open cadaver with the skin pulled back and pinned down for viewing the insides of. And then going on from that, the fact that they'd actually attribute the person whose body that was. The person who was that body?
Besides, there's always the fact that you're a student studying anatomy...
Reminds me of what my mum wanted to become back in the day. One of those people who actually did anatomically accurate renderings of anatomy for medical journals, studies, textbooks, et al and sundry.👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fhqwhgus In reply to Coidzy [2006-10-28 11:20:06 +0000 UTC]
I lose not pointy things too.
(Yes, yeesh!) Well, it is adorable.
Naw, you're just over-thinking it. Basically what it breaks down to is that different people have different turn ons.
Exactly.
Naw, it's my attempt to break away from the commercial and formulaic manga style and do something that would be considered "fine" or like museum/gallery quality art. Only it will, technically be illustration to be published in a book. So, technically, it'll skirt the edges between fine and commercial art. Basically, it's a way for Kelly and I to go back to our roots as artists, go back to what our classes taught us. We plan to run with the theme of "dissection," in an attempt to effectively take apart man, his society, his deepest inner workings. Naturally, there must be at least one picture of the insides of a human being is its purest state in as close to photogenic quality as my feeble hands can create. Although I really want at least one truly abstract piece.
Yes, but as I have no "print" account, nothing I do ever sees actual hardcopy existence, which would be the desired goal of this project.
Not necessarily. There are small print companies that will publish a few hundred copies at the creator's expense. But I think what we want is very modest notariety. Just enough so that when and if we decide to get into grad school, voila, we already have a thesis project.
Yes. Which is why "fine" art is dead and commercial art is such a joke. Only the areas of it that are deemed "popular" by society are worth going into. And then you get people like Britney Spears, who isn't as much as artist as she is a commercial gimmick.
(Me too.)
I dunno. I realise that I'm pretty paranoid. But damn. People here are sensitive and psychotic. Besides, I take forever to draw. I'm basically planning to take an entire six hour block on Tuesday to just sit there and draw. (Hell, I'll probably try to sneak in a granola bar, so I won't have to go to the snack area to eat. )
Yeah, it's crazy! They injected corpses with this clear polymer stuff and then hacked them apart, and apparently set them again. I sounds really cool, in a weirdo morbid way. I think that it'd actually be kind of cool to be preserved and put in a travelling exhibit. I mean, provided you're not like the "abnormally large ____" lady, or the "abnormally small ____" guy... the "diseased _____" person, or some other spectacle. Seriously, can you imagine being like the "elephantitis of the balls" man, even after you're long dead? That would be your place in history, a footnote in a science book next to somebody's little brother's cruel drawing... on your gigantic testitcles.
That's got to be a fate worse than death right there...
I'm actually a bit nervous about the smell. I have a really sensitive stomach, and the dead people might make me ill. Then they'd definitely kick me out and right onto my booty.
Yes, but that doesn't matter when it comes to legal rights and ownership. In the end, it's forever and always about the possibility that the museum or exhibit might get sued.
That's actually really cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-10-31 03:50:45 +0000 UTC]
Any place where you gotta pay to be published... isnae really publication.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-11-05 17:48:23 +0000 UTC]
indeed, but usually it's better to have the flesh taken out of your growth rather than the flesh being taken out of you before you even have a chance to grow.
it's all rape in the end. that's life.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-11-19 05:44:04 +0000 UTC]
I think a whole pound of flesh would hurt to cram in there though... I wonder what the average weight actually would be...
hm.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-11-24 04:18:51 +0000 UTC]
Umm... it's not exactly muscle-flesh through and through... It's rather light-weight down there... So it's not quite as bad as say, a low-density plastic dildo that was 2 pounds, but, yeah.... a 5 pounder would scare you(albeit, perhaps mildly)...
So i'd say a whole pound of penis would probably be a bit impressive if not outright 'ow' inducing.
and everything depends on where and how and what was involved with the cramming, though I think it'd make either nether-orifice sore for awhile.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-12-06 06:10:06 +0000 UTC]
What two other factors are these?
Right... I don't think gangbangs really apply to this arena, ma'am.
I really, really hope that's not some kind of esoteric clue...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Coidzy In reply to fhqwhgus [2006-12-08 02:05:09 +0000 UTC]
...Tentacle rape?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MDetector-5 [2006-07-05 20:22:23 +0000 UTC]
Oh, this is cute! Good colors and pose. I like this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1