HOME | DD
CSImadmax β trials and muffins
Published: 2011-08-03 16:55:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 91579; Favourites: 1526; Downloads: 1244
Redirect to original
Description
this game,,,,is addictive! and I don't know why, a game about a lawyer isn't supposed to be bored?anyway, derpy was sentenced to six weeks of community service and 3 weeks without muffins.
twilight used his new accquired experinces with anvils to write a book called "how to flat your egghead in ten seconds flat".
ponyx wright perfect record was snapped, now he's living like a hobbo in manehattan (but he got better)
Related content
Comments: 426
she role playing as a maleΒ
π: 0 β©: 0
The colt in the right panel makes me think of a Levi Ackerman pony
π: 0 β©: 0
shes never guilty you piece of **** twilight. you got what you deserved
π: 0 β©: 1
OBJECTION OVERULED
π: 0 β©: 0
If you liked this, go to YouTube now and find "Turnabout Storm". It's a Phoenix Wright MLP crossover. But what a great one! The storyline has blown my fuses royally :3
π: 0 β©: 0
OBJECTION! Man that is REALLY FUN TO SAY! XD
π: 0 β©: 1
Objection! Would you kindly shut up?
π: 0 β©: 1
OBJECTION OVERULED!
π: 0 β©: 1
Egads! I have been over-ruled! -Judge
π: 0 β©: 1
TOTALY GUILTY! *Slams hammer down* case closed.
π: 0 β©: 1
We should roleplay. Send me a note.
π: 0 β©: 1
sure, what ya got in mind?
π: 0 β©: 1
Anythin'. As long as we're both ponies or anthros. Send me a note when ready.
π: 0 β©: 0
HOLD IT! We have evidence that indicates that it was not the defendant, but an aquiantance OF hte defendant that droped the anvil!
At exactly 3pm Derpy's aquaintance from work was handed the anvil which dropped on twilight sparkle, the thing is this was no accident!
The aquaintance had dropped the anvil on twilight on purpose as part of an elaborate plot set up by none other than...
*Dramatic pause*
*EPIC FINGER POINT*
TRIXIE!
π: 0 β©: 1
trixie : no no NO! trixie will not stand for this
π: 0 β©: 1
Dont deny it. we all know you have more than enough of a motive to act against miss sparkle.
a linger animoisityΒ against her.
it makes more than enough sense.
π: 0 β©: 1
trixie : (grrrrr) you will pay for this,YOU WILL PAY!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Judge: well the evidence is clear cut. I judge the Defendant, Derpy Hooves, NOT GUILTY.
π: 0 β©: 1
good, GUARDS!, take trixie aw...
π: 0 β©: 1
Another job well done.
π: 0 β©: 1
trixie... is GONE!
π: 0 β©: 1
wait gone as in escaped or gone as in outta here?
π: 0 β©: 1
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
π: 0 β©: 0
not when i play
π: 0 β©: 1
Have you played Justice for All or Apollo Justice before?
π: 0 β©: 1
i've played all of the games, and never lost once
π: 0 β©: 1
Phoenix Wright got a guilty verdict on the last one for Justice for all so that means HE lost and in Apollo Justice he was framed for bringing forged evidence so he was forced to retire so he lost twice actually
π: 0 β©: 1
yeah, but technically, that's not loosing, because that is a part of the story
π: 0 β©: 1
Do you even know what I am talking about exactly? I'm just talking about Phoenix losing trials before not the player losing
π: 0 β©: 1
i know, i'm saying it only counts as a loss if the player looses
π: 0 β©: 1
then why are you arguing with me about this? And you still don't get it do you?
π: 0 β©: 1
i'm not the one arguing, you are, i'm just explaining
π: 0 β©: 1
And you still don't get it though I'm only saying Phoenix lost but your saying that it only counts if the player losses which is completely wring because part of the story IS him losing so he did lose just because the player losses doesn't mean he lost if the player never losses then he wouldn't have ever been forced to retire
π: 0 β©: 0
yeii! phoenix wright and ponies! *hugs you*
π: 0 β©: 0
Youβre Honor, I should like to file an appeal! The severe concussion suffered by the plaintive would not only have left her disoriented, but would also have impaired her memory of the event! We cannot rely on her testimony alone to identify the party responsible for her injuries! The Defendant must be declared incident due to lack of credible evidence!
π: 0 β©: 1
Judge: "Very well! Let the defense be given more time to get more witnesses!
π: 0 β©: 0
OBJECTION! you didn't even let me cross examine the witness!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Very well. Bring in your witness, but make it quick! I have to use the bathroom!
π: 0 β©: 1
What do I ask?....*starts to sweat* ummmmmm
π: 0 β©: 1
.....
*Taps fingers on desk and raises eyebrow*
π: 0 β©: 1
OBJECTION!!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>