HOME | DD

Craig-Larsen — lbc 402

Published: 2010-03-14 14:57:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 511; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 41
Redirect to original
Description apophysis fractal flame render
Related content
Comments: 22

Don64738 [2010-03-17 16:03:07 +0000 UTC]

Cool patterns!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Craig-Larsen In reply to Don64738 [2010-03-17 16:35:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PurpleAusCat [2010-03-15 08:01:34 +0000 UTC]

Spectacular and beautiful; great colours!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Craig-Larsen In reply to PurpleAusCat [2010-03-15 14:57:36 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gwan-Thewi [2010-03-14 19:09:48 +0000 UTC]

i really like this one. It reminds me of old machenery.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Craig-Larsen In reply to Gwan-Thewi [2010-03-15 00:00:54 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lupsiberg [2010-03-14 18:35:24 +0000 UTC]

I hardly ever postprocess in other programmes. Sometimes it helps to scale down triangles or to reduce blur, if used, or change the weight values

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Craig-Larsen In reply to Lupsiberg [2010-03-15 00:02:22 +0000 UTC]

another thing was before I rendered I thought it looked ok after all the colors seem to over lap hehe maybe I should render less and see what happens.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupsiberg In reply to Craig-Larsen [2010-03-15 00:24:43 +0000 UTC]

Yes, it's difficult to say.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lupsiberg In reply to Lupsiberg [2010-03-14 18:36:31 +0000 UTC]

Or the filter value in the render window

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Craig-Larsen In reply to Lupsiberg [2010-03-15 00:00:18 +0000 UTC]

There is no blur in it just curl linear in several triangles I could get it a little bit crisper but then the centers of the big circles looked completely black which isnt what I wanted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupsiberg In reply to Craig-Larsen [2010-03-15 00:28:57 +0000 UTC]

Have you also tried to adjust the variables values? Or sometimes it works when you delete one of the triangles. You would have to find out which. You can always "undo" and the triangle is back again

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Craig-Larsen In reply to Lupsiberg [2010-03-15 00:31:07 +0000 UTC]

well I only have 4 triangles in that and they all seem to play a heavy role. However on the bright side apo challenge changes today so I can abandon these and start messing with something new.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupsiberg In reply to Craig-Larsen [2010-03-15 00:33:41 +0000 UTC]

Quite right

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Craig-Larsen In reply to Lupsiberg [2010-03-15 04:23:38 +0000 UTC]

I tried shrinking down the triangles and came up with this its not to bad.[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lupsiberg In reply to Craig-Larsen [2010-03-15 08:49:03 +0000 UTC]

Not bad at all I think it's very beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Craig-Larsen In reply to Lupsiberg [2010-03-15 14:56:36 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VickyM72 [2010-03-14 17:08:31 +0000 UTC]

Now that's excellent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Craig-Larsen In reply to VickyM72 [2010-03-14 17:10:14 +0000 UTC]

Before I rendered the lines seemed so much crisper tho I am disappointed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VickyM72 In reply to Craig-Larsen [2010-03-14 17:11:15 +0000 UTC]

Just do what everyone else does and 'shop it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Craig-Larsen In reply to VickyM72 [2010-03-14 17:17:26 +0000 UTC]

I tried turning down the gamma but then there was to much black holes.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Craig-Larsen In reply to VickyM72 [2010-03-14 17:16:44 +0000 UTC]

lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0