HOME | DD

caraazul77 — lifeless

Published: 2007-02-01 21:01:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 449; Favourites: 11; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description I made the photo by using hdr technique.. 3 shots as different exposures..
Related content
Comments: 26

Manbot68 [2007-04-20 05:27:20 +0000 UTC]

Great example of HDR!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to Manbot68 [2007-04-20 05:48:40 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AchillesZ32 [2007-04-20 03:21:15 +0000 UTC]

Very nice. I like it cause you didn't fall into the trap of over doing the HDR. This refelcts more of what you would see with your eye.
Very well exicuted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to AchillesZ32 [2007-04-20 05:50:22 +0000 UTC]

thanks very much I'm glad you find it successful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

erykv1 [2007-02-05 23:01:33 +0000 UTC]

wow, great HDR!

did you just merge in photomatix without any tonal mapping?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to erykv1 [2007-02-05 23:20:32 +0000 UTC]

yeah i also used tone mapping, thanks for your interest

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vitoldus [2007-02-04 14:56:26 +0000 UTC]

Very good maybe even a bit creepy...
Well done HDR, doesn't look artificial at all. Did you use a one shoot in raw format, or did you shoot 3 jpgs? The wooden roof on the right side looks a bit strange, like there's ghosting or some other abberarion there. It's a bit lighter, but not completely. I hope you can see what I try to point out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to Vitoldus [2007-02-04 15:18:23 +0000 UTC]

I shoot 3 jpegs ..
yeah i can see the difference , after i cleaned the filter from the raindrops , got fogged up some spots..
thanks very much

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vitoldus In reply to caraazul77 [2007-02-04 16:30:56 +0000 UTC]

No problem at all. I tried merging jpgs before, but ended up with some really unrealistic result that I didn't like. Maybe I'll try HDR again, this time with raw files.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to Vitoldus [2007-02-04 17:28:45 +0000 UTC]

I use all the time tripod when i making hdr to get same frame.. on the photomatix (hdr program) generally using automate->batch processing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vitoldus In reply to caraazul77 [2007-02-04 18:33:01 +0000 UTC]

As an alternative you can shoot one raw and then convert it to jpgs using different exposure compenstaion settings

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to Vitoldus [2007-02-04 19:15:13 +0000 UTC]

yes, of course.. but it could loose quality i think

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vitoldus In reply to caraazul77 [2007-02-05 09:46:33 +0000 UTC]

I don't think so, you don't loose any quality shooting in raw, and if your raw is properly exposed, then you can get easily over and underexposed images from it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thomas-darktrack [2007-02-02 19:11:34 +0000 UTC]

very beautiful light !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to thomas-darktrack [2007-02-02 21:42:03 +0000 UTC]

yeah, it was an amazing experience!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thomas-darktrack In reply to caraazul77 [2007-02-02 22:00:42 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bunver [2007-02-02 12:53:52 +0000 UTC]

çok güzel olmuş. bende denedim hdr tekniğini photoshopta ama birleştirirken hata verdi nerde yanlış yapıyorum ki?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to bunver [2007-02-02 18:32:52 +0000 UTC]

selam, teşekkür ederim photomatix programını bulup indirin, hdr için bir programdır..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

scorpion2kpk [2007-02-02 10:40:56 +0000 UTC]

oo kinda scary

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to scorpion2kpk [2007-02-02 18:34:27 +0000 UTC]

you're right, little bit gloomy atmosphere

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

josepaolo [2007-02-01 23:21:27 +0000 UTC]

wow i love it !

wonderful photo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to josepaolo [2007-02-02 08:12:04 +0000 UTC]

thanks very much

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

imagemalice [2007-02-01 21:59:35 +0000 UTC]

Cok guzel...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to imagemalice [2007-02-01 22:25:49 +0000 UTC]

teşekkürler

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bubi7 [2007-02-01 21:41:32 +0000 UTC]

super

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

caraazul77 In reply to bubi7 [2007-02-01 22:25:35 +0000 UTC]

sağol

👍: 0 ⏩: 0