HOME | DD

c34r7as — swapswap / revertswap

Published: 2017-10-25 23:29:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 732; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description i don't see the difference. but hey have it anyways.
Related content
Comments: 11

CARNO-POWER [2019-04-24 12:26:36 +0000 UTC]

you should update this with the actual swapswap design

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SnasTheSekelont [2018-02-13 12:43:15 +0000 UTC]

ITS NOT FUCKING REVERTSWAP DUDE, SEARCH IT

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

flambeworm370 [2017-11-05 06:11:51 +0000 UTC]

Did you use a ref for this design or is this your own design?

also, I don't wanna seem like a dick or like one of those assholes that corrects everyone but swapswap and revertswap are 2 different AU's
the design you made is swapswap so yea

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

c34r7as In reply to flambeworm370 [2017-11-06 05:01:03 +0000 UTC]

for the design it's sorta a mix of both. and i knew they were two different au's but i just don't really see the difference of the au's . from what i was able to find both au's are just swapped versions of underswap.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flambeworm370 In reply to c34r7as [2017-11-06 05:18:46 +0000 UTC]

ok so for the ref thing i mean did u base this drawing off another sans design for the AU or did u make it without ref

and yes they both swap from underswap but there is a difference
In swapswap sans has the personality of underswap papyrus and papyrus has the personality of underswap sans while being in their normal positions
while in revertswap sans has the personality of underswap sans and revertswap papyrus has the personality of underswap papyrus

There are also canon designs for both AU's so yea

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

c34r7as In reply to flambeworm370 [2017-11-06 22:06:28 +0000 UTC]

ok thanks for explaining ! for the design yes i used a base.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flambeworm370 In reply to c34r7as [2017-11-06 22:25:09 +0000 UTC]

a base or a ref of the design?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

c34r7as In reply to flambeworm370 [2017-11-06 22:51:40 +0000 UTC]

ma bad. i used a ref

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flambeworm370 In reply to c34r7as [2017-11-06 23:34:42 +0000 UTC]

 was it this? because its very similar

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

c34r7as In reply to flambeworm370 [2017-11-07 02:29:54 +0000 UTC]

 nope it was this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

flambeworm370 In reply to c34r7as [2017-11-07 03:04:58 +0000 UTC]

ohhh my friend lolgamers thing
1. thats old and 2. thats actually my swapswap design

👍: 0 ⏩: 0