HOME | DD

barrierlife — The Sisters of Southgate, x00
Published: 2010-06-19 17:38:01 +0000 UTC; Views: 152; Favourites: 1; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description Preface: an Introduction to The Sisters of Southgate

There are many stories like this one in the world, that tell the tale of the War of the Princes. Some of them are about the sad Prince Michael, some of them are about the proud Prince Logah; others tell the story from a different side, like Paul Rutherford, who was a friend of both princes, or Sir Harry Tanner, who was a knight that fought in the war. And even though most of these stories are true, they usually ignore one very important truth: that all of these men, and all of these stories, are tied together by two very important women: Theresa Everett and Abigail Quincey.

Historians--people who study the past--call these women the "Sisters of Southgate," although they weren't sisters like we know today. They didn't have the same parents, and in fact, they didn't even grow up in the same town! But they were very much like sisters, because they loved each other very much, and they believed in the same things, like honesty, and love, and always doing the right thing.

Of course, there are people who know the stories of the Sisters of Southgate--if there weren't, this book wouldn't exist! But their story isn't told as often as Michael's, or Logan's, or Harry or Paul's, because people like stories about heroes, and most people don't think that Theresa or Abigail were as "heroic" as those men. But, as this book will show, a woman doesn't need to pick up a sword and fight in large battles to be a hero--she simply needs to believe in herself and do the right thing.
Related content
Comments: 3

DarcKnyt [2010-06-19 18:16:22 +0000 UTC]

I enjoyed the piece. But if the target audience is eight or thereabouts, I wondered if the language was too rich. Not so much the difficulty of the words themselves so much as just how the sentences were complex and interesting... to ME, an adult. Would a child my son's age (he's eight) be overwhelmed and a little bored trying to get through it?

You know much more about this than I do, I'm sure. I have a child who'd rather play Wii than read, and finds the library boring (*weeping bitter tears*), but he's the only eight year-old I know.

Regardless, this is brilliantly written and the prose is clean and crisp. I liked it.

And btw, is it me or have you been quiet for a LOOOOONNG time? Good to see your work again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

barrierlife In reply to DarcKnyt [2010-06-19 19:33:10 +0000 UTC]

No, I really have been quiet for a "LOOOOONNG" time. I haven't been writing much in the way of prose, so I haven't had much to post. I've written a poem or two in that time, but I don't know if I want to post them before I perform them (I usually tweak them a lot more after I get a live-audience reaction). Mostly, I've been working on my two screenplays, which I'm naturally much more nervous about sharing online than prose. So, again, I've been quiet.

And, you might be right about it being too complex. Contrary to what you might believe, I'm probably the worst judge--I was reading Dragonlance when I was eight, XD!!

In defense of my (*cough*) work, though, the idea I had to spur this along was that it wasn't so much for children to read themselves (though, I'd love it if they did), but as kind of a fairy-tale / bedtime story deal, for parents to read to their children. I figured kids would have a slightly broader attention span for something they could sit back and listen to (while they look at the pretty pictures), and that I could get away with being slightly more verbose than usual? The more "classical" books of fairy tales, bedtime stories, and such, that I remember from my childhood were written in this style.

Point of reference: I had a huge old dusty hardcover collection of (de-cannibal-ized) Grimm fairy tales when I was a young'un. That's the memory I was drawing on...for what it's worth.

And you pegged it right on, I was aiming at (six-to-) eight-year-olds--being about the youngest that kids read books for themselves, and the oldest that kids let their parents read them bedtime stories, it looked like a fertile middle ground. Though, after your comment (it makes a lot of sense), I might have to buck up and aim for the 9-12 bracket. I'll go off and ponder this.

Thanks! (and it's good to back!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

slavemama2010 In reply to barrierlife [2010-07-06 22:28:24 +0000 UTC]

It's a great beginning! And as far as target age goes... someone extraordinarily wise once said "Write the story as it wants to be told. Worry about the target age when you're done."

I think this has the makings of a great YA fantasy. (ages 10-14, they read the kinds of things you did when you were eight.) The good news is, that means you can have a longer story, with the kind of detail you are good at
xx

👍: 0 ⏩: 0