Comments: 27
JESzasz [2015-06-15 20:42:18 +0000 UTC]
Β This is how the F-22 should've looked in the first place. With both vectored thrust and canards, there'd be very little that'd be able to match her maneuverability.
Β Maybe they figured it'd be too easy for the g-forces from that sort of maneuverability could get to be too dangerous for the pilot?
π: 0 β©: 1
Hardcorev20 In reply to JESzasz [2017-07-24 15:29:34 +0000 UTC]
The answer to that question is rather easy, simply incline the seat back some and the pilot will be able to handle more g-forces before blacking out.
π: 0 β©: 1
JESzasz In reply to Hardcorev20 [2017-07-26 18:14:20 +0000 UTC]
Β Guess they'll only do that if faced with enemy fighters that have better maneuverability, and that would make a huge difference in the outcome of a dogfight.
π: 0 β©: 0
678091 [2015-02-15 20:32:07 +0000 UTC]
My versions of the F-22A (which I'm Aptly gonna call it F-22V Hover Raptor) have the Model numbers based on engine design and role
F-22V- Mod.1-156: Has a modified Pratt&Whitney F-119 engine with vents pointing at the wing fans for downward thrust upon take off, wing desing is unaltered mostly to keep the design as stable as possible however it includes an "open wing" system to allow airflow and change in directions mid-flight
F-22V-Mod.0-187: Another (more conventional) modification, instead of "open wing" design of its VTOL model, this STOVL variant has nozzles under the wing that can twist up to 53 degrees and the forward nozzles can twist up to minus 20 degrees and plus 53 for landing and takeoff purposes only
Note: The 187's design is currently prone to overheat with extended use of 2 hours, it currently being revised
π: 1 β©: 0
Anzac-A1 [2015-01-09 04:08:35 +0000 UTC]
You got any specs for it?
π: 0 β©: 1
bagera3005 In reply to Anzac-A1 [2015-01-09 05:59:01 +0000 UTC]
need to compliant them
π: 0 β©: 0
PetrINFJ [2013-04-07 20:06:33 +0000 UTC]
Nice design and all... I will better not ask how many dolars does it cost xD
π: 0 β©: 1
bagera3005 In reply to PetrINFJ [2014-01-07 03:50:08 +0000 UTC]
US$200Β million
π: 0 β©: 0
Quesocito [2013-02-15 20:53:57 +0000 UTC]
cool man
π: 0 β©: 0
117Jorn [2012-09-19 02:50:42 +0000 UTC]
Oh my god...that...its...PERFECT!
π: 0 β©: 0
MPLXNovasurge [2011-03-24 22:47:33 +0000 UTC]
canards+stealth+thrust vectoring=WIN!
π: 0 β©: 0
LightningF22 [2011-02-24 07:27:47 +0000 UTC]
Hi Bagera3005. LightningF22 here. I added your FA-22 Raptor to my favorite page. You do very professional work. I work for Boeing on the F22 developing the cockpit controls. Visit my page to see a Flash cockpit I built from memory. Will soon have all displays posted. Next project is to create the cockpit in 3D using MAYA. This should give it a more realistic look and feel.
π: 0 β©: 0
Marx-Paragon In reply to bagera3005 [2009-07-26 02:42:30 +0000 UTC]
hmm, looks cool. does it improve aerodynamics?
π: 0 β©: 1
Anzac-A1 In reply to Marx-Paragon [2014-01-30 08:15:28 +0000 UTC]
Actually, a canard foreplane reduces longitudinal stability, and is often intentionally used to destabilise an aircraft to increase manoeuvrability, but can also be used as pitchΒ stabilisers for otherwise unstable designs.
π: 0 β©: 0
TacticalCrash [2009-07-22 01:31:12 +0000 UTC]
Sweet man
π: 0 β©: 0
Tounushi [2009-07-21 09:40:38 +0000 UTC]
Add canards on anything and it's instantly cool!
π: 0 β©: 0
BlacktailFA [2009-07-21 06:22:28 +0000 UTC]
I came up with a design kind of like this a while back, sort of as a thought experiment --- but yours looks WAY better!
All that's missing are some independently-pivoting, 3D Thrust Vectoring Nozzles. XD
π: 0 β©: 0
IronHawk711 [2009-07-21 04:53:59 +0000 UTC]
With canards F-22 seems cute...^^
π: 0 β©: 0
ShardaronTheDragon [2009-07-20 23:25:57 +0000 UTC]
I agree. That would be a show stopper at any airshow.
π: 0 β©: 0