Comments: 38
Spearien [2022-01-02 14:05:26 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TurckerStarsong [2019-03-20 23:26:52 +0000 UTC]
Makes me wonder if carnosaurs are relatives of spinosaurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Heytomemeimhome [2014-12-07 09:16:35 +0000 UTC]
Does beautiful work, my only question is with the post orbital fenestrea really have been that visible on living individuals?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JurassicTyrant [2014-11-04 09:08:14 +0000 UTC]
What are the sauropods on the background? Camarasaurus?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
olofmoleman [2014-08-31 11:21:38 +0000 UTC]
Very nice. But aren't they missing protofeathers on their arms? They they had quillknobs on the bone of their fore arms.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to olofmoleman [2014-09-06 00:16:31 +0000 UTC]
These were attachments for muscle fibers, actually.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
olofmoleman In reply to randomdinos [2014-09-06 11:23:07 +0000 UTC]
The original publication:
A bizarre, humped Carcharodontosauria (Theropoda) from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain
Francisco Ortega1, Fernando Escaso1,2 & Jose´ L. Sanz2
9 September 2010
In the publication the bumps on it's forearm are interpreted as quillknobs and compared to those of an extant turkey vulture. They are pretty much identical. If this was an isolated case then I would maybe have been more skeptical. But since we now know that "proto feathers" and "dinofuzz" goes back at least to the base of Coelurosaurs. It's not unreasonable to think it goes back even further. So I don't see a good reason to doubt that these bumps are anything but actual quillknobs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to olofmoleman [2014-09-06 17:19:03 +0000 UTC]
I don't doubt that these bumps could be quill knobs, it's just that recently I've heard many rumours across the net of them being attachments for muscle fibers. However, as the quills are present even in ornitischians, I do believe Concavenator probably had some.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
olofmoleman In reply to randomdinos [2014-09-07 09:25:33 +0000 UTC]
Rumours are hardly anything to go by.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to olofmoleman [2014-09-07 15:11:36 +0000 UTC]
''Since the popular arm quills turned out to be just muscle fiber, there is no actual reason to depict this animal with quills or dinofuzz all along the body (although its still a possibility)''. - Durbed, dA
''..and the supposed ulnar quill knobs being part of an intermuscular line...'' - Theropod Database Blog
I don't know where they're getting their information from, but it doesn't seem to be just rumors.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
olofmoleman In reply to randomdinos [2014-09-07 15:54:39 +0000 UTC]
Without any proper sources I don't see a reason to give this much merit. Aspecially given the context of other related definitely feathered Theropods.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
randomdinos In reply to olofmoleman [2014-09-07 16:44:29 +0000 UTC]
Other related theropods have also been found to have scaly skin, and Concavenator is not a coelurosaur. Concavenator probably had protofeathers like its relatives, not neornithe-like feathers identhical to a turkey vulture's.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Revan005 [2014-06-28 06:58:50 +0000 UTC]
I like.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NestieBot [2014-06-05 15:44:37 +0000 UTC]
OMG
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Milvolarsum [2012-03-04 19:16:16 +0000 UTC]
...! Wow
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tarturus [2011-11-18 07:00:36 +0000 UTC]
This is quite an interesting looking species. ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BrokenMachine86 [2011-07-10 17:56:59 +0000 UTC]
AMAZING!!!!! The perspective in the right Concavenator is outstanding!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Acaciathorn [2011-07-03 02:38:23 +0000 UTC]
The scales are amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
atrox1 In reply to batworker [2011-06-24 20:29:23 +0000 UTC]
Слева самец, справа самка разглядывает его узор.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ksdinoboy95 [2011-06-24 16:28:28 +0000 UTC]
awwwwwwwwwwwwwsum work my paleo-bro'!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pilsator [2011-06-23 21:57:31 +0000 UTC]
Epic work. Kinda reminds me of John Sibbick, but with accurate instead of sausage-legged meat bag dinosaurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
atrox1 In reply to Boobsinette [2011-06-23 19:03:18 +0000 UTC]
I'm just really love to draw dinosaurs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JoachimL [2011-06-23 11:59:23 +0000 UTC]
Very good! I like it!
Joachim
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NateB [2011-06-23 03:39:26 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful work. Traditional work certainly has a quality you just can't replicate with digital mediums. Very nice composition, too!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Auronyth [2011-06-23 02:43:15 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
malevouvenator [2011-06-23 00:16:25 +0000 UTC]
The sauropods from the background are turiasaurus or aragosaurus?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DinoHunter000 [2011-06-22 20:55:31 +0000 UTC]
Wow! This is incredible! I almost get a Raul Martin vibe coming from this picture, due to the amount of detail and style..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
axe-ql [2011-06-22 20:45:50 +0000 UTC]
детализация просто зашкаливает 0_0 бесподобно
чем это нарисовано?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
atrox1 In reply to axe-ql [2011-06-23 06:20:00 +0000 UTC]
Нарисовано обычной акварелью на ватмане, при деталировке использовал гуашь.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Deinowilly [2011-06-22 20:42:46 +0000 UTC]
Wow, I was expecting this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0