Comments: 38
lyoth737 [2011-04-22 12:33:05 +0000 UTC]
that's a pretty cool story
I've seen two foxes in a zoo, but no wildlife fox ... you're lucky!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to lyoth737 [2011-04-22 14:40:30 +0000 UTC]
What I found hilarious was the fact that foxes are one of my top two favorite animals and this was my first close encounter with one whereas everyone else in my family have had experiences like this one. XD
I hope you see a wild one someday. Even if it's from afar it's still quite an experience.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lyoth737 In reply to Artistic-Vixen [2011-04-26 17:52:51 +0000 UTC]
yeah, but really dangerous for the fox...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to lyoth737 [2011-05-01 18:09:40 +0000 UTC]
The foxes I've seen tend to be pretty smart about when they cross the highways (like they wait until a very large gap in traffic), but then there are the dumb ones that really don't see cars as enemies until it's too late or if they're lucky they just have a close call. In America we had a big problem with Pumas getting killed on roads, so there are some places that have the animal tunnels that go under the road, but they aren't wide spread. Most places just try to build fences, which don't work very well, or they just leave things alone and put up signs telling motorists to watch out for animals crossing the road.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to lyoth737 [2011-05-02 20:07:14 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, other animals have difficulty with the tunnels because pumas do actually use them, so it makes them nervous. In America, deer, possums, and raccoons are the ones who fall prey to cars on the highway the most, which isn't that bad when it comes to deer. We have too many in the midwest and they have absolutely no natural predators, so cars kind of replace that in a way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to lyoth737 [2011-05-03 19:07:29 +0000 UTC]
Well, cars are not so much modern day way of hunting as a potential danger to the animal's life with a high fatality rate. A car is definitely not a recommended hunting tool. XD Actual hunting by humans with guns or bows replaces what the natural predator would've done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to lyoth737 [2011-05-04 18:19:57 +0000 UTC]
There is a hunting season that's strictly for hunting with a compact bow and arrows. No idea what the point is, but I guess it's for people who don't like guns, but still want to hunt. There are quite a few people who hunt here because they make a living out of it. They serve as game meat providers for restaurants and butchers. Pretty much if you hunt any sort of game you're expected to use it whether you use it for yourself or you find a buyer. Yes, there are humans who get a rush when they hunt, but many of them do strictly hunt for the more primitive and natural purpose of obtaining meat. Hunters also can't go after one animal all year round. There are seasons for each game animal and there's a limit to how many animals you can kill during the season. There are huge fines for going past that limit, too.
I think it's crueler to let overpopulated animals slowly starve to death, which is the case in certain areas with deer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lyoth737 In reply to Artistic-Vixen [2011-05-05 15:01:34 +0000 UTC]
ok, I didn't know of hunting seasons with bow and arrows
but I've heard of the limit earlier from whale hunting
...and I think I've heard from somewhere if there's an accident and
for example the deer is dead, you can call the huntsman
he sells the dead animal to a restaurant then
and it's good that the law is strict to the ones which killed too many animals
yeah, overpopulation is really one of the big problems
'cause of that they try to bring wolves and lynx back here
I don't know if they can, because the people have to accept them first
and that will be difficult...really
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to lyoth737 [2011-05-11 14:27:41 +0000 UTC]
We do have some wolf release programs in places like the Rockies and states nearby that area, but the people who run those are always fighting with the cattle and sheep ranchers. The reintroduction of wolves is very controlled. I don't know if there have been any programs involving other predator animals though.
I live in a suburb that has lots of wooded areas and it's amazing how much outcry there was when it was discovered that a pair of coyotes had moved into the area. We don't have ranchers in the suburbs, but we do have stupid pet owners who want to let their declawed, outdoor cats roam free all day without getting eaten or want to let their small dog outside and not have to spend time watching them. The same sort of people made a fuss about the neighborhood foxes. Luckily, the animal control people have said no to their requests every time because the animals haven't done anything to humans, so there's no reason to remove them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lyoth737 In reply to Artistic-Vixen [2011-05-12 13:49:56 +0000 UTC]
I think filing dog teeth is pretty weird
because if the dog bites, then it's the owners's fault not to train the dog against that
and why do some people crop ears and other things?
if they want a dog with ears standing up, they easily can buy one with those ears
and there are races born without tail
because the most important thing is the education
yeah, traditions and familiar views are good, but sometimes it's better to try new things out and to correct old ones
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to lyoth737 [2011-05-17 13:38:47 +0000 UTC]
The ear cropping and tail docking had a purpose when it first started. While for some breeds it was to make the dog look more ferocious, for the most part it was done to avoid injuries when they were doing their job. This was before the medical break throughs that made infections not so dangerous. Also, apparently in Early Georgian times in the UK there was a tax on dog tails and docking tails helped people avoid tax. Nowadays it mostly persists because of people being selfish and not understanding just how much it affects the dog. I can understand doing the procedures if there's a medical reason, but purely cosmetic reasons, no.
I agree. Besides, I've seen examples of the breeds that are traditionally subjected to those procedures without such alterations and they're so much cuter. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to lyoth737 [2011-05-25 05:15:46 +0000 UTC]
Probably. Hopefully they don't.
I have no idea. Maybe it was just another thing that could be taxed back then. I'd like to see a tax for docking and cropping, but unfortunately I don't think it'll exist any time soon in America. I live in Missouri where there are puppy mills and we passed a wonderful bill that would crack down on them...and now there are people in the state senate trying to get it repealed. So much for democracy.
Nowadays breeders are trying to avoid inbreeding them, but it can still happen with the bad breeders. It's the same with certain colors of breeds. Poodle breeders in the past did that with apricots because both parents have to have the apricot colored coat if you want apricot pups. In recent years the issue was chihuahuas. They're actually one of the healthiest breeds because they don't have much history of being inbred, but since they became so popular there are breeders who are inbreeding and it's produced some terrible results. There was a litter born somewhere and all the puppies were deformed. No front legs (a few had some stumps where the legs were supposed to be, but a couple didn't even have that).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to lyoth737 [2011-05-28 04:40:32 +0000 UTC]
They are descendants of nine, but I don't think the nine were related. If you branch out enough you can avoid major inbreeding. I mean Amur leopards can have up to four cubs, so there's a lot of possibilities for mate combinations that keep the genetic material fresh. I think the wild ones are probably more likely to be inbred since they don't have the controlled, selective breeding that zoos do, but who knows. Think about it as though it were one of those math problems that asks you to list all possible combinations. If done right you won't get the combos that can lead to inbreeding. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Akerin [2008-11-12 01:11:11 +0000 UTC]
My god, you're so lucky. He's beautiful. ^^
I used to live in WA, and my grandparents live really close to Mt. Rainier. Been up there a few times, but I've never seen any foxes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to Akerin [2008-11-13 16:58:53 +0000 UTC]
I'm still amazed I got to see him! I've never had much luck when it comes to seeing foxes until then. We had a red fox living in our area a couple years ago and everyone in my family saw him except me. I only caught a glimpse of him on New Year's Eve and even then he was hard to see since it was night.
I love your avatar! It's so cute!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Artistic-Vixen In reply to Emerra [2008-11-01 23:44:12 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! It was absolutely amazing! Gray Foxes tend to be more timid than other foxes, so it was really cool that he stuck around like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0