Comments: 42
usg65 [2022-03-21 21:55:49 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
Goblin62 [2021-10-06 10:03:01 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 1
cullyferg2010 [2017-12-11 04:31:24 +0000 UTC]
Thought it was the F3F.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtbroSean In reply to cullyferg2010 [2017-12-12 23:40:26 +0000 UTC]
Yes, she originally appeared in the book Wild Concept and the author uses her in a lot of promo pictures.
π: 0 β©: 1
cullyferg2010 In reply to ArtbroSean [2017-12-13 02:40:51 +0000 UTC]
Understood, and thanks for the insight.
π: 0 β©: 0
samsamsam204 [2017-03-10 06:25:10 +0000 UTC]
It's great art.
π: 0 β©: 1
Rand-Tor [2016-10-21 14:23:50 +0000 UTC]
Wboa!
Talk about ... Fuel-Injected Passion!
10 in my book!
Great Work!
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtbroSean In reply to Rand-Tor [2016-10-21 22:16:19 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! Much appreciated!
π: 0 β©: 0
G4MM43T4 [2015-10-19 02:59:20 +0000 UTC]
nice biplane
π: 0 β©: 1
haventon [2015-09-14 00:18:33 +0000 UTC]
Love the picture of both girl and aircraft.Β Despite the outfit being wrong, (this is not a complaint), it is also more historically accurate than many may think at first glance.Β Girls that flew carrier based aircraft were used for promotional purposes during WWII.Β Some, such as Maureen Dunlop were disappointed that they were not allowed to fly in combat.Β Β
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtbroSean In reply to haventon [2015-09-14 21:11:23 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! That's interesting to know. I wasn't aware of that.
The client asked for that specific outfit, as the scene has a relationship to stories in his book.
π: 0 β©: 0
ArtbroSean In reply to PaulPoser [2015-09-11 21:10:30 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I appreciate that!
π: 0 β©: 0
time4u [2015-09-11 05:45:30 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful!
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtbroSean In reply to time4u [2015-09-11 21:10:08 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
π: 0 β©: 0
Virgilante [2015-09-11 02:08:47 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, Sean. I'm seeing some traffic coming my way from your post. People seem to be enjoying this one. Might mention the book of short stories is only 99Β’. Craig
π: 0 β©: 0
ArtbroJohn [2015-09-11 01:52:58 +0000 UTC]
I DO see what you did there!
π: 0 β©: 1
Azrael-Luchador [2015-09-10 19:46:14 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful, really beautiful
π: 0 β©: 1
Vaughanp [2015-09-10 19:15:08 +0000 UTC]
The old "Brewster Buffalo" It looks much like (the plane, of course)
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtbroSean In reply to Vaughanp [2015-09-11 01:30:27 +0000 UTC]
Oh, yeah, it is pretty similar, isn't it?
π: 0 β©: 1
Vaughanp In reply to ArtbroSean [2015-09-11 14:42:27 +0000 UTC]
So ... if you removed the biplane wings, it is a BB ...
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtbroSean In reply to Vaughanp [2015-09-11 21:12:41 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, it's a Grumman F2F, which was replaced by the F3F, which was then replaced by the BB. They all look pretty similar.
π: 0 β©: 1
mudbogz In reply to ArtbroSean [2017-01-09 01:55:33 +0000 UTC]
The really fun part is that the F4F, destined to become the Wildcat, began life as another in the line of Grumman biplanes. It actually lost in the trials against the Brewster F2A Buffalo. The wildcat was redesigned as a monoplane fighter and became the go-to fighter by the beginning of WWII, relegating the F2A to secondary roles with the Marine Corps until after Midway in 1942.
Awesome rendition of the F2F.
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtbroSean In reply to mudbogz [2017-01-09 21:02:24 +0000 UTC]
Oh, that's cool! I didn't know that.
Thank you!
π: 0 β©: 1
mudbogz In reply to ArtbroSean [2017-01-14 02:55:56 +0000 UTC]
In 1935 the F3F was barely off the drawing boards into flight testing when Grumman started work on the G-16 prototype which would become the XF4F-1. It maintained the biplane configuration of the F3F and the manually cranked, narrow track landing gear. The G-16/XF4F was faster, the F2A Buffalo was more maneuverable. The Navy wanted a monoplane fighter and so it went with the F2A Buffalo from Brewster, however it also placed a production order for the G-16, designated XF4F-1 by the navy,Β in case the F2A Buffalo proved unsatisfactory... It was clear to Grumman that the F2A would be superior to the G-16/XF4F-1 so the F4F-1 was scrapped and redesigned as a monoplane and designated XF4F-2. The XF4F-2 dispensed with the biplane design and settled on a mid wing monoplane design with rounded tip wings and tail surfaces. Still clear that it was inferior to the Buffalo Grumman redesigned the plane yet again with squared off wing and tail surfaces and a supercharged Pratt and Whitney R-1830 engine and Designated F4F-3. After testing, a redesign of the tail surfaces changing theΒ vertical tail to the more familiar design the F4F-3 began to show its true potential. The Navy, by now realizing the Buffalo was fast becoming obsolete opted to accept the F4F-3 into service. The F4F series showed its true strengths as it could absorb massive amounts of damage and bring its pilots home. Armed first with four, then six .50 caliber machine guns it could also dish out a powerful punch. Oddly enough, Brewster went on to license produce the Chance Vought F4U Corsair, while the F4F was license built by the Eastern Aircraft Division of General Motors under the Designation FM-2.
π: 0 β©: 0
Victor2K [2015-09-10 15:21:38 +0000 UTC]
Like the uniform
π: 0 β©: 1
bozeeke [2015-09-10 13:05:40 +0000 UTC]
This is awesome
π: 0 β©: 1
ArtbroSean In reply to bozeeke [2015-09-11 01:30:37 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! I appreciate that.
π: 0 β©: 0