Comments: 18
kimikikiki [2016-05-04 05:43:35 +0000 UTC]
So awesome. good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JNRedmon [2015-06-22 19:28:11 +0000 UTC]
That is so awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NataN77 [2015-06-21 04:36:57 +0000 UTC]
I thought the D3 caco looked awesome from certain angles and just dumb from other angles. while this new one looks alright. still not that crazy about it. but you did a good job illustrating it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arborix In reply to NataN77 [2015-06-21 05:13:59 +0000 UTC]
Well compared to the last one it's definitely an improvement :U
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GuardianStriker [2015-06-17 23:29:55 +0000 UTC]
I'll bet DOOM 1 and 2 Cacodemon pissed himself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arborix In reply to GuardianStriker [2015-06-18 03:36:39 +0000 UTC]
Haha I've gotten so many asks about that on the Doom blog, gonna post responses relating to that next week
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Arborix In reply to gzegzolka [2015-06-17 17:32:18 +0000 UTC]
The Doom 3 cacodemon was cool but it was a crime to even call that thing a cacodemon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
gzegzolka In reply to Arborix [2015-06-17 18:58:45 +0000 UTC]
it was flying thing, like a flying mushroom or some kind of brain, but it was far away from what cacodemon is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AspiePie [2015-06-17 12:29:35 +0000 UTC]
It in anime porn!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LewdBacon [2015-06-17 11:45:32 +0000 UTC]
Well done! They really look like themselves now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arborix In reply to LewdBacon [2015-06-17 17:33:26 +0000 UTC]
They really do, and I'm so happy they didn't totally butcher their designs!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
josegoncalo [2015-06-17 11:31:06 +0000 UTC]
great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chiefmageddon [2015-06-17 05:01:08 +0000 UTC]
precious baby
pets it VIOLENTLY
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arborix In reply to chiefmageddon [2015-06-17 05:06:52 +0000 UTC]
If I had a good full body ref of the mancubus I'd draw him as well, I freaking love the design but I can't find anything but low quality game screenshots (and of course that beautiful HD one but it doesn't really show the full body)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
raymoohawk [2015-06-17 03:49:25 +0000 UTC]
the new caco totally murders the doom 3 version!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Arborix In reply to raymoohawk [2015-06-17 03:52:02 +0000 UTC]
It was neat in it's own way, but by no means was it a cacodemon. THIS is a cacodemon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0