Comments: 19
ANOZER [2010-12-15 17:56:02 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for FAV
I like your works...Bravo
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
justeline [2010-06-20 22:28:54 +0000 UTC]
Love the contrast in this one! Simple, elegant and effective image!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zanzak In reply to DimensionSeven [2010-05-23 21:56:59 +0000 UTC]
whats wrong with the f stop and the iso? whatever makes a good picture imo...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DimensionSeven In reply to Zanzak [2010-05-24 06:53:45 +0000 UTC]
It's a technical thing. Iso 320 and f/16 gives equal exposure to iso 200 and f/13.
The lower iso gives less noise (although I know that there's not much difference with that sensor), and f/13 makes sharper pictures than f/16. Diffraction kicks in at f/8 in the center, and at f/11 in the corners, so you have to make sure not to pass these borders if you want to squeeze the most out of your camera.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DimensionSeven In reply to Zanzak [2010-05-24 14:59:21 +0000 UTC]
Good choice, for Canon APS-C, that's the best wide angle lens (although the Tokina 11-16 f2.8 and Tokina 12-24 f/4 II come close as well, and they are cheaper too).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zanzak In reply to DimensionSeven [2010-05-24 15:03:14 +0000 UTC]
Which one of those three would you recommend the most, based on price and quality?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DimensionSeven In reply to Zanzak [2010-05-24 15:36:37 +0000 UTC]
Depends on what you need: the 10-22 is the widest and the slowest of them. The 11-16 f/2.8 is the fastest (optically), but has small zoom range. The 12-24 f/4 is the most convenient. Both Tokinas are better built than the Canon. Only the 10-22 EFS is good for infrared photography of the 3. For sharpness, chromatic aberration, vignetting and distortion characteristics search for them on the mentioned sites.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zanzak In reply to DimensionSeven [2010-05-24 15:41:02 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! Appreciate the help.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0