HOME | DD

amerindub — Crudes

Published: 2011-07-12 11:10:12 +0000 UTC; Views: 535; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description Or maybe taking closeup photos with your iPhone is artistic. What do I know?
Related content

amerindub - Progress? Bar

amerindub - What? No play button?

amerindub - Reality T.V.

amerindub - Mini Solitaire Playable Stamp

amerindub - I can has stamp?

amerindub - WTF FTW... The Stamp

amerindub - I Care

amerindub - The Lamar Says...

amerindub - Error Message Template

RakiParra - Check out my gallery Stamp

Chiminix - Balany stamp

Burningrobotsofdeath - You should try it.

LaRhette0 - Stamp VII

frequired - Reply Stamp

BecSparrow - Stamp: Faves without comments

pinoleny - STAMP: Stop telling me what to

Waffle-Wizard - - STAMP - Knock It

Death-MarkedLOVE - Let's hate - stamp
Comments: 11

leniboi [2024-07-05 22:10:51 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MissBeastie [2011-07-13 05:25:18 +0000 UTC]

It's bad art, but still art in my opinion. Before people complain, they should criticize.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SionnaDehr [2011-07-12 18:36:14 +0000 UTC]

I've liked artistic nude. Hell, I might draw something akin to it when I get better at anatomy, but people who just draw porno are just... they give people who actually like to draw artistic nude a very bad name.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Outer--Science In reply to SionnaDehr [2012-03-29 03:22:14 +0000 UTC]

I LOVE your signiture

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LittleAlienGirl [2011-07-12 17:35:53 +0000 UTC]

I don't see why it's any worse than when people take the same kinds of pictures of their faces.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

crimsonsaphire [2011-07-12 15:53:22 +0000 UTC]

there is a difference though between artistic nude and porn. Showing off your tits and bouncing them or your penis isn't art it's porn and shows that they are a whore.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sotkettu In reply to crimsonsaphire [2011-07-12 20:03:07 +0000 UTC]

A 'whore' wants always money and (s)he puts nude photos to a commercial porn site, not to deviantART. Maybe 'exhibitionist' could be the proper word for the naked people of deviantART.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crimsonsaphire In reply to Sotkettu [2011-07-12 21:09:27 +0000 UTC]

you have a point there, but it is still disgusting and they obviously want attention.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sotkettu In reply to crimsonsaphire [2011-07-13 07:52:15 +0000 UTC]

Of course they want attention if they really are exhibitionists. But the deviantART is not the only page that has too many low quality nude photos. For example Wikimedia Commons created a template 'Nopenis' because people sent too many photos of their genitals to different Wikipedia articles about sexuality.
[link]
'Thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikimedia Commons, a non-profit media repository with the primary scope of providing educational and informative images and media. Submissions that are low quality or do not fall into Commons' scope may be subject to deletion.'

Maybe deviantART also needs a template like that for non-artistic nude photos.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

crimsonsaphire In reply to Sotkettu [2011-07-13 15:44:26 +0000 UTC]

I agree deviantart might need to eventually do something about it, because it is starting to get out of hand.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Saphire1515 [2011-07-12 11:27:54 +0000 UTC]

I'm fine with artistic nudes as long as they're actually artistic and not just some dude's dick

👍: 0 ⏩: 0