Comments: 13
sufferingindigital [2008-11-14 03:26:32 +0000 UTC]
I would comment on the art i just don't quite understand it yet .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sufferingindigital [2008-11-14 03:25:56 +0000 UTC]
I was going to say great poem but obviously it's from lao tzu
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
seekingmysoul [2008-11-14 01:23:35 +0000 UTC]
Time is gold...pricless and for many running out. Beautiful
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ratafluke [2008-11-13 19:58:10 +0000 UTC]
Hey, now this is a manip! You're not seriously telling us you have 3 clocks that are broken in exactly the same way?
Anyway, it's cool how you can see the clock through the broken hole of the other!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NoVacation In reply to Ratafluke [2008-11-13 21:01:31 +0000 UTC]
he could shot it 3 diffrent times than combie the frames S: its still photography I think
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ratafluke In reply to NoVacation [2008-11-13 23:44:26 +0000 UTC]
That's exactly what he did, and that makes it photo manipulation: Combination of elements from several different frames.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
lancekatre In reply to Ratafluke [2008-11-17 14:02:56 +0000 UTC]
Not necessarily. Could just be a really fucking awesome long exposure shot.
Then again, I'm no photography guru.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ratafluke In reply to lancekatre [2008-11-18 22:11:03 +0000 UTC]
Ah, now I see how it'd be possible with an exposure time of several minutes. Only in that case the clouds in the sky would be all blurred.
I spotted other examples in which there were mirrored elements. I guess *ahermin has a penchant for passing off cunning photoshop work as genuine photography.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NoVacation In reply to Ratafluke [2008-11-14 11:13:58 +0000 UTC]
well I guess you are kinda right.
but its not like it changed the whole concept of photography S:
he didn't add things that are not there or not suppose to.
I mean its not like he changed the concept of reallity as most of photo manipulations do..
but you are right in the bottom line.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ratafluke In reply to NoVacation [2008-11-16 00:50:11 +0000 UTC]
He added things. Period. That makes it manipulation. Yes, it still looks like a photo - and that makes it even more dishonest, trying to pass this manipulation off as photography.
I used to admire *ahermin 's photos a lot. But now I'm wondering with every submissions if it's honestly photography.
Nothing against photo manipulation - it still takes creativity and mad skills to come up with realistic looking images. But dishonesty peeves me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NoVacation In reply to Ratafluke [2008-11-16 16:44:52 +0000 UTC]
I understand, even though I still enjoy those images... so I really don't care. but mmm I guess you are right he should change the tittling
👍: 0 ⏩: 0