Comments: 16
matsurus [2006-07-26 16:14:20 +0000 UTC]
I do
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
stevecook23 [2006-04-22 10:06:44 +0000 UTC]
That's a striking piece of work; I like the contrast of the glowing shadow too, the way it's turned on its head the standard ideas of light and dark.
Too little sleep, sorry, that comment came out poo.
Anyway, nice one!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AaronSmurfMurphy In reply to stevecook23 [2006-04-22 10:07:57 +0000 UTC]
Relax, I got woken up by over excitable family telling me I had a conditional uni place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
teamzoth [2006-04-21 19:37:42 +0000 UTC]
thats pretty damn cool man.
I love the textures.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AaronSmurfMurphy In reply to teamzoth [2006-04-21 20:55:49 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, I was really experimenting with some of the inking.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tiamat9 [2006-04-21 18:38:10 +0000 UTC]
Nicely done. The symbolism is very effective. Fine form and colors.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AaronSmurfMurphy In reply to tiamat9 [2006-04-21 20:53:41 +0000 UTC]
Cheers man. Originally the top background was pure white and grenade only had lineart inking. The image was pretty flat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ktcoope [2006-04-21 09:35:42 +0000 UTC]
The VERY obvious influence from the invisibles. The bit where he leaves the smile granade behind always ammuses me.
I like the colours and reflection and the way you did the BG.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AaronSmurfMurphy In reply to ktcoope [2006-04-21 11:18:30 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, background was supposed to be like the mottled background I did with Kate's Suggestion last year but it messed up so fuck it I though: lets try new inking styles.
Having just read a load of John Wagner comics too may have some influence on the recent themes I've been doing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ktcoope In reply to AaronSmurfMurphy [2006-04-21 11:41:46 +0000 UTC]
It's a nice technique. The one thing I would say (expects smiting for this) but it's a real shame the inks you used weren't more waterproof, as they muddy the colour up a little bit and the image would look better being crisper.
btw, if you want, over summer, I can help show you how to pretty up trad stuff that you scan so they look better on screen a little. You're already pretty sound, but if you want any of my half-knowledge of photoshop, I will share.
*suddenly remebered she promised herself a new graphics tablet when the essays are done, makes note to order that.*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AaronSmurfMurphy In reply to ktcoope [2006-04-21 12:12:41 +0000 UTC]
Actually the inks went on after. They look muddy because the scan messed up - toooooo much contrast. Fixing it today. These days I pencil the ar first, make the final lines heavy, rub them out to eveal mrakings/outlines, colour it THEN add inks.
It really is just a bad scan, honest!
As for the lessons, sure. I'm fine at B/W and have mastered it pretty much. Colour scans still taunt me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ktcoope In reply to AaronSmurfMurphy [2006-04-21 13:35:09 +0000 UTC]
On the contrast thing, if you're not already doing it, avoid the 'brightness and contrast' control and use levels instead.
On the pencil thing though, pencil can muddy up your colours as well, especially when you do as many washes as you do, so make sure you keep it light. A really really waterproof ink to do your basic lines might be better. (Like simple biro inking, then do the propper inks afterwards.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AaronSmurfMurphy In reply to ktcoope [2006-04-21 15:17:51 +0000 UTC]
Usually I do avoid them like the plague. This time I was runing out of options (the original raw scan was pish to start with which my own fault because I rushed it.)
I see what you mean with pencils so I use mechanical pencils to avoid dirt. As for Biro's... I just can't get the results I want and they take so long to dry properly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ktcoope In reply to AaronSmurfMurphy [2006-04-21 16:54:56 +0000 UTC]
Graphite is graphite, using mechanical pencils doesn't change that. (Though using very hard lead might.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0